http://www.bettybowers.com/isbushgay.html

OH pleeeaaasssee, You thilly thavage, just because he wears pink ties and cuddles with his dog it doesn't mean he likes boys more than girls.

Totally ridiculous post.

Why change his style?

Why indeed?

Please, let's not go off the deep end here calling the President a Homosexual, we all know very well he is not.

It's true.
Cannot divulge my sources.
This explains his obsession with stopping gay marriages. Remember J Edgar Hoover, the big drag queen?

i know no such thing!



u know what they say, the bigger the homophobe, the more dresses and makeup in the closet..

muahahahahaha!!!!!!!

and his texas lisp..it's...gayish......not to be onfused with gaysha, which is another thread alltogether.

and never forget he killed JFK too

He was such a fag, and nobody would dare ask why he had been living with a man for 30 years

oh, he was a queen, not even a king

You'd think it must be a slow news day with the level of intellectual posting about some ridiculous notion that GWB was gay. But no, it is in fact, a very good day for America to expose the continued Liberal deciet & feloneous activity i.e. "Trousergate". Found some nukes in Iraq too.

Lookin' better and better for Dubya every day!

Perhaps GWB is not gay.
However, JESUS, now there was one really gay guy.

This is just a FABULOUS thread!

That picture of him with the dog is so Paris Hilton-esque! That's definitely a keeper.
Although is that really him? I'm not so sure, but good one either way.

Shouldn't this be in the humor form?

KFC proves that he is a waste of life.

Ouch!

I suppose that this also means that a sizable percentage of Spanards are also homosexuals too. After all, thay do speak with that Castilian lisp. Right?

yeah, i would tend to agree.. Spaniards are some queers.

they dont have the culture that those of us from Latin-America have.

all the mixing with the Aztecs and Inkas and Tainos and Africans have breeded out the gay lisp that those queer Spaniards have over in Europe.

This sounds like a classic example of a social class trying to appear higher by attempting to put down another. I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

Tell us true. Where are you from Huey?

Gee...

I can't believe that d2d2 allows this thread to go on since he shut down one that attacked John Kerry in much the same manner, (Kerrys campaign schedule). I hope I don't see a bias here...hmmmm

Go read it for yourself. No part of it had any basis in fact. It does not say anything about what Kerry was, is, could be or will be. Unfortunately Pauly aka the phony Mr. McCain is not upholding the enviable reputation of his real life namesake, and personally demeaning posts could even be damaging the conservative cause.

The President being gay DOES have a basis in fact d2? Please Sir, you know better. Allow that type of thread accusing a christian married man of being gay may very well be damaging your liberal cause.

But I suppose that is your right.

I agree that GWB is probably not homosexual and I think it's all a rather pointless subject for discussion.

yes it does.

i took a psychology course a few semesters ago, and Dubya displays the characteristics of a repressed homosexual with an Oedipus complex, sexual insecurity and penis envy.


this thread is relevent, because it displays evidence of homosexual tendencies, such as Bush referring to other men as "pretty", and referring to himself as a "west Texas GIRL", and provides links to articles which support this claim.


furthermore, it is only fair that if Republicans and Bush supporters are going to raise questions about the nature of John Kerry and John Edward's relationship, then they should be more than willing to endure speculation about their own candidate's sexual orientation.


have a nice day

I was addressing D2 Huey, not you. Now go play with your beret like a good little boy.

Then Sir, using that logic, and applying it to this thread as you did the kerry thread previously mentioned, that would justify now closing this thread as well.

Unless there is some other reason unmentioned to keep it open.

OMG your right, and they always wear tight pants..and funny hats...

Pauly, the primary intent of your post was viscious and slanderous as opposed to a redeemable and debatable issue. In this topic at least, there is something resembling a civilized debate on an issue that is of some concern to the members, judging from the number of posted replies that are not inflamatory.

d2d2:

I find this topic both offensive and disgusting and can see no justifiable reason for a forum moderator to defend it.

You say it is of some concern to the members. It is of concern to me due to it's scurrilous nature only. I had refrained from posting but a little balance needs to be applied here.

You state in an earlier post that you agree GWB is probably not homosexual and that it is pointless to debate it.

My question is...why are we still debating it?

The answer is - we are no longer debating it. So...topic closed.