Or he should suffer the consequences.
If he wants to fight this dirty, he better watch out.
The democrats and friends have LOTS of money.
Bush has no record to run on, so he has resorted to the same old tricks, nasty personal attacks.
We should be discussing the real issues, but NOOOOOO, we are stuck in smearsville.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2004Aug21.html

Yeah, political smearing is something i rather against, so i'm not giving my boy Bush any points for this one.

You're right Thai, medals can't be faked, but then again, it isn't medals that are gonna run our country, is it?

True.
So bush should be a man and try to defend his indefensible record and debate the ISSUES that matter to American lives TODAY.

Medals don't have to DO anything. It's what they say about the man who will be the next president.

It is possible that people change, could be for better or for the worse. And i'll tell you something else that says something about Kerry, his own words and actions. And i quote specifically Kerry saying these things, January 23rd, 2003.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein."
"The threat of Saddam Hussein with WMD is real."

And now he's condeming Bush for the War in Iraq. Maybe we should give Kerry a Flip-Flop medal. What is it that Kerry believes exactly? He sure isn't giving us a definite answer. A man who can't be taken into account for his word isn't somebody i want running the country.

But as long as he has his medals, he's fit to be our leader right?

Medals don't judge who he is now. Medals judged what he did in the past, not what he will do.

You are absolutley right tq. The issue most important to Americans is fighting the war on terror. If this war is not won all other issuses are mute. The radical muslims are ###### bent on imposing their perverted view of society on the rest of the world.

If they win (and you survive) YOU will be wearing a burka.

You know Kerry is in deep doo doo when the folks in San Francisco are turning on him!

Jeh Johnson of the Kerry campaign came out last week with a very sheepish, flip-flopping correction (what else would you expect?) that parses a sentence in a way that would make Clinton green with envy: "I believe he has corrected the record to say it was someplace near Cambodia; he is not certain whether it was in Cambodia, but he is certain there was some point subsequent to that that he was in Cambodia." Come again? Ironically, Kerry used his original comments about his time in Cambodia to talk about government duplicity. He should rename his campaign theme "Hype is on the way."

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file.../23/asparks.DTL

what are u talking about buddy?

it's possible to support action against Saddam Hussein, but not necessarily the WAY George Bush went about taking that action.

agreeing on the use of force against Saddam doesnt necessarily mean u agree with the way Bush did it.

period.

John Kerry's criticisms of the timing and methods of George Bush's actions in Iraq is very legitimate.



what does Cambodia have to do with the 2004 presidential election?

and dont give me that "it shows Kerry is a liar who exaggerates" bull####, because if we're going to judge John Kerry's character by wether he exaggherated how close he was to the Cambodian border, then we need to judge George Bush's character based on how he misled us about Iraq.

PERIOD.

and with 1,000 troops dead and more to come, THAT'S what we should be talking about. not this stupid irrelevent Cambodia garbage that seems to fill every single one of your posts Boon Mee.

And what other way of disarming Saddam would've been taken exactly? Pass a few more resolutions with absolutley no impact?

How exactly did Bush mislead our country about Iraq? I'd like you to elaborate on that one Huey.

Casualties are an inevitablilty of war, if you don't know that, then you shouldn't be debating this.

Houe dont you get tired of beating a dead horse?