http://thenewsoldierbook.com/_wsn/page3.html

Here are just a few 'fun' exerpts:

August, 1971 -- The FBI opens a full investigation of the VVAW to "determine the extent of control over VVAW by subversive groups and/or violence-prone elements in the antiwar movement," noting that "sources had provided information that VVAW was stockpiling weapons, VVAW had been in contact with North Vietnam officials in Paris, France, VVAW was receiving funds from former CPUSA members and VVAW was aiding and financing U.S. military deserters. Additionally, information had been received that some individual chapters throughout the country had been infiltrated by the youth groups of the CPUSA and the SWP [Socialist Workers Party]." Source: FBI Memorandum to Senate Select Committee, 12/2/75, pp. 2-3; Hearings, Vol. 6, Exhibit 72.

November 12 - 15, 1971 -- the VVAW leadership meets in Kansas City. Fearing surveillance by authorities, the group relocates the meeting to another building. They debate, then vote down a plan to assassinate several pro-war U.S. Senators. Despite John Kerry's claim to have left the VVAW before this event, several witnesses, meeting minutes and FBI records eventually place Kerry at the Kansas City meeting.

1978 -- Former VVAW leader Robert Muller founds the Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA). The VVA also describes John Kerry as a "co-founder" of the organization

1981 -- Mueller leads a VVAF delegation to Hanoi, where he praises the communist leadership of Vietnam and lays a wreath on the grave of Ho Chi Minh.

No.
John Kerry is definitely NOT a communist.
Next (ridiculous, absurd, red-baiting, juvenile, idiotic) question, please.

When did you beat your wife?

The correct question is when did you last beat your wife?

He's not a Communist but he's basically just an opportunist...we all know that. The only reason any of y'all on the "left" are supporting him is your irrational hatred for Dubya - right?

Who is defining rational? Would you define the obsessive smearing over Kerry's Nam era history as rational or irrational?
There are two candidates running. Just because bush is president doesn't mean he deserves special consideration. The question is who would do a better job as president going forward from 2004. Kerry, of course, in a heartbeat.

How is the Dems spending 65 million dollars through 527s to tell LIES about Bush giving Bush special consideration? The fact is Thai, conservative 527s have only spent around 20 million on ads against kerry. The reason the 20 mill is overwhelming the 65million from the left is because americans can tell the difference between lies and propaganda the left dishes out versus valid concerns about the varacity of kerry's claims about his own war record.

He lied Thai, he got caught lying, and now Bush is accused of being unfair for the 527 ads that kerry will use against Bush at every turn. When you libs are crucifying a Republican with lies the world is a wonderful place, but when you get caught and the shoe is on the other foot, it's dirty pool and you are being victimized. Grow up you whining babies. I promise you if you will just nominate a decent human being with a shred of honor and some core values, he won't have anything to be afraid of. But nooooooooo in 4 years your going to put up the damned Antichrist, Hillbilly the lesbian Clinton.

And you still think kerry would be a better President. Wake up Thai, your betting on a loser. A communist loser.

George Allen will be president after Bush finishes his next term.

Forgive my ignorance, but who's George Allen ?

George Allen is a Republican US Senator from Virginia. Prior to, he was Governor of VA and has been around in politics since 83.


http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/cgi-bin/...code=&plusfour=

Yes, and only IGNORANT AND UNINFORMED Americans have been fooled by his attempt to hide his communist nature by moving to the "middle"

Scary John Kerry's humilation this November is becoming more and more probable.