The bush cabal is negotiating to CHICKEN OUT of one of the three proposed debates. Interestingly, the one debate he is really afraid of is where UNDECIDED voters will get a chance to pose questions. You see, bush can only handle questions from extremely pro bush crowds.

Why is this a mistake, you ask?
Because this tactic is a good move for an incumbent who has a BIG LEAD.
bush, electorally speaking, is BEHIND.
He is trying to coast on a NONEXISTANT lead.
This move will correctly be percieved by the voters as WEAKNESS and COWARDICE.

This tells a lot. His handlers have a very low valuation of his debating abilities.

Election day -- BRING IT ON!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...6-2004Sep7.html

i hate to say it, but im really liking the fire that's been under Kerry's ### lately.

he's putting it all together in a solid, coherent argument against Bush.

Indeed.
The TIDE and MOMENTUM are now turning away from bush, and towards the next President of the United States: JOHN FORBES KERRY

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/polit...ion/whbriefing/

I'm still voting for Bush even if he doesn't go to one single debate.

Debate = Kerry's there = if I wanted to watch/hear Jerry Springer type Kerry BS I'd watch JS!

The less I have to put up with Kerry's stupidity, the happier I am.

Your candidate is a DADDY'S LITTLE RICH BOY, BRAIN DAMAGED, CLOSET HOMOSEXUAL, DEBATE DODGING, SLEAZE SLINGING, MORON.

Be a man and debate!

bush and Cheney have said this is the most important election EVER.
So put your money where your mouth is and DEBATE THE ISSUES in front of the American people. They lie about sending our boys to die for freedom and democracy in Iraq, yet they refuse to fully participate in our American democracy.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...2-2004Sep7.html

Yeah, well, the difference between listening to John Kerry and listening to George Bush is the difference between reading Elmore Leonard and James Joyce. The language of Kerry's campaign is so lame that he can‘t connect. He has not yet connected with the American voter. You listen to the president of the United States, whether you agree or disagree with Iraq. . . . his language is direct.
The other problem for the Kerry campaign is that Kerry probably thinks it's a good thing when you're compared to James Joyce.

Bet half the voters out there haven't even heard of James Joyce!

Hiter was direct.
Mussolini was direct.
Hussein was direct.

Lets look at the SUBSTANCE, not the style, KAH?

So which one is which ?

I gave up reading Ullyses after about 10 pages. That must be Bush.

Elmore Leanord is a bit lame but still fun with good story lines. I suppose that must be Kerry.

The momentum has now switched to Kerry:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/...38,00.html?=rss

The reports and evidence about bush draft dodging are being listened to, because TURNABOUT IS FAIR PLAY.

Dream on Thai, that's what you do best...