This is simply amazing! The Dems are not going to give up on this turkey! This is only the fourth, fifth, or sixth(?) time they have attempted to beat this dead horse. It is getting to the point where they are turning off the public. So why do they continue attacking Bush's National Guard record?

Insanity, that is what. Insane hatred! And the one good piece of advice that Clinton gives them, they pointedly ignore.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NC TO LAUNCH FRESH ATTACK ON BUSH GUARD DUTY: WILL RAISE QUESTIONS ABOUT 1978 CAMPAIGN LIT

**Exclusive**

Faster than a CBS eye can blink, dogged Dems are set to take to the airwaves anew hoping to keep questions about President Bush's National Guard duty in play, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

Candidate Kerry apparently has rejected former President Clinton's advice not to get further locked in a 2004 Vietnam quagmire.

"George W. Bush's campaign literature claimed that he 'served in the U.S. Air Force.' The only problem? He didn't," slams a new DNC press release set for distribution.

Dems will attempt to increase the heat on Bush ahead of his planned Tuesday address before The National Guard Association gathering in Las Vegas.

In 2000, Bush opened his National Guard Association speech: "General, I am reporting for duty."

MORE

Kerry plans to speak to the group on Thursday, but he personally hold back questioning Bush's service, sources explain.

The coordinated nationwide effort this week by the DNC has been code-named "Operation Fortunate Son."

"George Bush has a clear pattern of lying about his military service," DNC Communications Director Jano Cabrera blasts in the new release. "From 1978 to the present day, George Bush has refused to tell voters the truth about his service. It's time for the President to come clean."

"Flyers distributed to Texas voters during Bush's failed Congressional race say 'he served in the U.S. Air Force and the Texas Air National Guard.' But according to Air Force officials, Air National Guardsmen are not counted as members of the active-duty Air Force."

MORE

This active duty status thing is a fart in a hurricane thing. When I was on active duty, there were NG(National Guard), ER(Enlisted Reserve), ER(draft personnel), and RA(Regular Army). They were all on active duty, and for all intents and purposes, while active, there wasn't a dimes worth of difference between them. Although I was technically in the Active Reserve, I was still active duty Army.

To make an issue out of a nonissue, is amazing in that if this is all there is, why aren't they addressing the issues? Could it be because the issues will also sink JFK, the lesser?

This has simply got to be Clinton's use of 'reverse psychology' here. Tell them to do something, and get your 'boy' Terry McAufull to help torpedo kerry.

I am truly mystified here. So, don't anyone tell me that the Clintons are not actively saboutaging the Kerry campaign. Jeez!

PS: This will further enhance Clinton when Kerry loses. He can shrug his shoulders, and state "I told him so". And all the time the Dems were doing exactly what he really wanted.

That's just Kerry's way of finding out if anyone cares if he said he was in the Navy when he was really in the Navy Reserves. So this brings up a fine thought....does Kerry always accuse Bush of what he himself is or was doing?

They seem to be doing it to distract from some other significant events over the weekend:
1. the 9/11 rememberance( they still can acknowledge the reality of that)
2. the viet vets for truth rally in front of congress http://kerrylied.com/ order the video it was a enlightening event.
3. the fact that Dan Rather is finally hopelessly hosed!

Bob, there could be something to what you are saying here. It very well could be an attempt to shift the interest away from the CBS/60 Minutes fraud connection with the DNC. However, if so, this will come out in a couple of days and hurt them further.

I really relieve that this is the reverse psychology that I mentioned above. I know that I have pushed the Clinton connection with Kerry's demise, but I am convinced that both of them just have too much incentive to do so. They simply cannot allow Kerry to enter office. Otherwise, Hillary would have to stage an in-party revolt somewhere halfway through the Kerry administration.

If you consider the number of Clintonistas who have been pushed on to Kerry, it is beginning to look like a Clinton reelection campaign. Clearly Kerry cannot be happy is he has any intelligence.

Plus, Kerry is painfully aware as to just who still runs the Democratic Party now and in the future. It is not good for his monumental ego.

If you will note, during the entire time(weeks) that I have pushed this on the forum, not one Kerry supporter has even dared to touch this subject with a ten foot pole. I wonder why? Could it be that they are just a wee bit concerned themselves?

If anyone here can show a better reason for this madness that the Dems are engaged in, I am open to suggestions. Clearly, Democratic strategists, who have some sembelence of reason, are rolling their eyes and wringing their hands at this lunacy.

It could be like you say they are attempting suicide. The DNC may be becoming aware what a liabilty Kerry really is and are affraid, as they should be, of thier candidate actually getting in office.

The only thing Kerry is fit to command is his windsurfer!

link to entire flyer

As usual, your robotic response belies the need for some reading classes. If you had again bothered to read your own thread, or the posts above, you would be able to see the I rebutted your post. But since you never, ever bother to read posts, unless they "looK"good, you probably missed it.

I think that I will need to treat you as a subadult, as you are exhibiting all the characteristics: poor attention span, limited cognative skills, poor writing capabilities, and a host of others. You are beginning to remind me of the 'Baby Huey' comic character of the 50s.

Poor fellow. Some simply mature faster than others.