Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Us Making Iraq A Safer Place
Political Topics And Discussion > All Things Political > Asia Political Topics
Pages: 1, 2
Ben-T
You could...call it a revival I suppose.

When Pan-Arab Nationalism fell through, and the Islamic Revolution happened in Iran, Islamism sort of just took over as the cause that united the Arab people.

In reality what is going on currently, is more of an Islamic Reformation than Revival.

It looks nothing like the Christian Reformation did, but that is what it is.
C.Woww
QUOTE (Ben-T @ Apr 28 2005, 01:59 AM)
You could...call it a revival I suppose.

When Pan-Arab Nationalism fell through, and the Islamic Revolution happened in Iran, Islamism sort of just took over as the cause that united the Arab people.

In reality what is going on currently, is more of an Islamic Reformation than Revival.

It looks nothing like the Christian Reformation did, but that is what it is.
*


Yes a reformation. Definitely an evolution. I suppose the big question is the degree of militancy. I'm not sure how to quantify that. Certainly many muslims feel they are under attack by outside forces. I guess the onus is on the outside forces to prove them wrong.
dixon76710
QUOTE (C.Woww @ Apr 27 2005, 07:15 PM)
Yes a reformation. Definitely an evolution. I suppose the big question is the degree of militancy. I'm not sure how to quantify that. Certainly many muslims feel they are under attack by outside forces. I guess the onus is on the outside forces to prove them wrong.
*



"REFORMATION"???!!! They are Islamic FUNDAMENTALISTS. Adhering to the FUNDAMENTALS of Islam. Strict adherence to the text of the Koran and Haddiths. Couldnt be further from the truth. MARK
C.Woww
QUOTE (dixon76710 @ Apr 28 2005, 01:16 PM)
"REFORMATION"???!!! They are Islamic FUNDAMENTALISTS. Adhering to the FUNDAMENTALS of Islam. Strict adherence to the text of the Koran and Haddiths.  Couldnt be further from the truth.      MARK
*


Yes I know but it's hard to make a distinction between a temporary revival and a reformation. As Ben suggests it could just be growing pains. You sound a little fired up yourself if I may say so.
Ben-T
QUOTE (dixon76710 @ Apr 28 2005, 06:16 AM)
"REFORMATION"???!!! They are Islamic FUNDAMENTALISTS. Adhering to the FUNDAMENTALS of Islam. Strict adherence to the text of the Koran and Haddiths.  Couldnt be further from the truth.      MARK
*


I wasn't talking about the Wahabbiists, I was talking about the Middle East/Islam as a whole.

You seem to have trouble talking about two subjects at one time. Is this true? If so, how can I make what I say easier for you to understand?

Oh and on a second note. The reformation I was referring to would entail the fall, not the rise, of Islamism.
dixon76710
QUOTE (Ben-T @ Apr 28 2005, 02:06 PM)
I wasn't talking about the Wahabbiists, I was talking about the Middle East/Islam as a whole.

You seem to have trouble talking about two subjects at one time. Is this true? If so, how can I make what I say easier for you to understand?

Oh and on a second note. The reformation I was referring to would entail the fall, not the rise, of Islamism.
*



This "particular incarnation" of "Islamism" is simply NOT a reformation by any stretch of the imagination or definition of the word. They are traditionalists, conservatives adhering to the ancient text. Quite literally the opposite of a reformation. MARK
dixon76710
QUOTE (C.Woww @ Apr 28 2005, 08:07 AM)
Yes I know but it's hard to make a distinction between a temporary revival and a reformation. As Ben suggests it could just be growing pains. You sound a little fired up yourself if I may say so.
*



"revival" would imply just the opposite of a reformation. MARK
Ben-T
QUOTE (dixon76710 @ Apr 28 2005, 02:51 PM)
This  "particular incarnation" of "Islamism" is simply NOT a reformation by any stretch of the imagination or definition of the word. They are traditionalists, conservatives adhering to the ancient text. Quite literally the opposite of a reformation.        MARK
*


Except that this particular "incarnation" Of Islam is losing.

The Iranian people hate their Islamist government.

The Saudi people hate the House of Saud, which uses Allah to justify their reign

The Wahabbiists are a fringe minority of Muslims that find their main targets in other Muslims.

Those Muslims who are giving us the problems are the traditionalists, yes. However The Muslim World has been in flux since the 1940s, and their long reformation is reaching it's end.

The Traditionalists are losing. Make no mistake, the United States has entered into this war much closer to it's end than it's beginning.
Razin
day by day a safer place indeed ! rolleyes.gif


A Look at U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq

QUOTE
By The Associated Press
Sun May 1, 7:34 PM ET

As of Sunday, May 1, 2005, at least 1,580 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the    Iraq war in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count. At least 1,199 died as a result of hostile action, according to the Defense Department. The figures include four military civilians.

The AP count is six higher than the Defense Department's tally, last updated at 11 a.m. EDT Friday.

The British military has reported 86 deaths; Italy, 21; Ukraine, 18; Poland, 17; Spain, 11; Bulgaria, eight; Slovakia, three; Estonia, Thailand and the Netherlands, two each; and Denmark,    El Salvador, Hungary, Kazakhstan and Latvia one death each.

Since May 1, 2003, when    President Bush declared that major combat operations in Iraq had ended, 1,442 U.S. military members have died, according to AP's count. That includes at least 1,090 deaths resulting from hostile action, according to the military's numbers.


4-Day Death Toll Since Iraq Named Gov't

QUOTE
Sun May 1, 7:28 PM ET

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Here is a breakdown of the four-day death toll since    Iraq named its new government April 28. At least 105 Iraqis and 11 U.S. soldiers have been killed.


Thursday: 5 Iraqis, 5 U.S. soldiers killed

Friday: 47 Iraqis, 5 U.S. soldiers killed

Saturday: 17 Iraqis, 1 U.S. soldier killed

Sunday: 36 Iraqis killed

Total: At least 116 killed



Latest Developments in Iraq

QUOTE
By The Associated Press
Sun May 1, 6:42 PM ET

Developments in    Iraq on Sunday:

A suicide car bomb exploded at the funeral of Kurdish official in the northern Iraqi city of Tal Afar, killing about 25 people and wounding more than 50.

_ Iraqi militants kidnapped an Australian man living in Alamo, Calif. The video obtained by Associated Press Television News, showed a man identifying himself as Douglas Wood, 63, with two militants pointing automatic weapons at him. He appealed for coalition forces to withdraw.

_ Australian Prime Minister John Howard said he will not negotiate with terrorists who reportedly kidnapped an Australian man in Iraq. Howard told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio, "We can't have the foreign policy of this country dictated by terrorists."

_ U.S. and Iraqi forces detained several suspects in the abduction of Margaret Hassan, the director of CARE International in Iraq, who was believed slain last year.

_ Italy's government says its report on the slaying of Italian intelligence agent Nicola Calipari by U.S. troops underscores problems with coordination among authorities in Iraq and with rules of engagement for checkpoints. Calipari had just won the release of an Italian hostage, journalist Giuliana Sgrena, before he was shot dead on March 4.

_ At least six other car bombs — one of them a suicide attack — and five roadside explosions hit Baghdad on Sunday, killing six Iraqis, wounding more than 20 civilians, six Iraqi police officers and five U.S. soldiers.

_ Insurgents in eastern Baghdad jumped out of a pickup truck near a checkpoint and fired machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades. Other insurgents appeared from behind nearby trees and joined the attack. Five policemen were killed and one was wounded.

_ Elsewhere in Baghdad, insurgents in three parked cars opened fire with handguns on a police patrol in the western Jihad neighborhood, wounding four policemen.


Summary: Foreigners Held Hostage in Iraq

By The Associated Press
Sun May 1, 4:58 PM ET

QUOTE
Insurgents in    Iraq have kidnapped more than 200 foreigners ...


(se the article for all details)

seems like it is quite save already ~! blink.gif
Razin
Pentagon: Photos of Soldiers in Iraq Dying in Vain

with link to the source of these photos:

Freedom of Information Act Forces Opening of 360 New Photos

so safe ! blink.gif Return of the Fallen "PENTAGON RELEASES HUNDREDS MORE WAR CASUALTY HOMECOMING IMAGES"

many other interesting stuff there too - like about Saddam - "presentable young man" cool.gif
Ben-T
People are dying in a war?

######, we've lost. Can't fight a war in which people die, it just can't be done.
Razin
safer and safer !

that is the point - not about who's lost ! about - making it safe smile.gif


already very safe ...


A Look at U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq

QUOTE
As of Tuesday, May 17, 2005, at least 1,622 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the     Iraq war in March 2003 ...


on May 1 the figure was - 1,580 ; means - within about 2 weeks - over 40 more soldiers were killed. this is officially.....

casualties of other countries provided there as well
Ben-T
Making it safe?

Operation Matador is ravaging Insurgent strongholds along the Syrian Border

Zarqawi and pals are on the run

the Iraqi government grows stronger and stronger every day

The Iraqi Security forces grow stronger and stronger every day

The Iraqi Insurgency has made an enemy of the Iraqi People

The Iraqi Insurgency has done nothing but chip at the edges of the US military

And all they can do is murder people. They are in there final death throes. The Nazis did the same type of thing at the end of WW2.

What evidence can be brought to bear to show that the Insurgency is at this point anything more than a roving band of serial killers? There prospects of winning are now nill.
Razin
Analysis: Surge in Iraq violence

QUOTE
Over the last two weeks, almost 400 people have been killed in Iraq. Experts are left struggling to explain the escalation of violence.

...

What is striking, more than two years after the war which toppled Saddam Hussein, is how little the Americans appear to know about their enemy.

There are thought to be dozens of insurgent groups, with differing agendas. They sometimes act autonomously, sometimes in loose co-operation.

The stark truth may be that no one can know for sure whether there is a pattern to the insurgency, or why the violence ebbs and flows.



Estimated recent Iraq death toll

very safe ! laugh.gif

Iraq's murky corpse mystery

QUOTE
In a country where things often turn out to be different from the way they at first seem, the retrieval of around 60 corpses from the Tigris River near al-Suwayra, south of Baghdad, is one of the murkiest and most complex stories to hit the headlines in recent months....



Eight killed in battle in Mosul

QUOTE
A Iraqi politician says eight of his bodyguards have been killed during a gun battle with insurgents and helicopter-backed US forces.

The politician, Fawaz al-Jarba, told the BBC seven of his men died at the hands of the US troops.

Mr Jarba, a Sunni Muslim member of Iraq's National Assembly, said insurgents had started firing at his house and that his guards fired back. The clashes then came to the attention of US forces.

"The firing was coming from all directions and the Apaches (US helicopters) were bombing," Mr Jarba said. "The terrorists were firing at me. Why did the Americans start doing this too?"

The US military statement said an investigation had been launched into the incident....



strange indeed, huh? the guy is Sunni muslim which are backed up by US, and more than that - a member of Natioanl Assembly - also supported by US. why to fire at him ? blink.gif

surely - to make Iraq a safer place ! wink.gif
Ben-T
Why the hell would it be safe? There is a war going on there.

Generally warzones are not safe.
Razin
ha! my point exactly !

why indeed ?

perhaps coz US makes it safe ? popcorn.gif

thanks for stating the obvious though - that it is not safe ! rolleyes.gif
dixon76710
QUOTE (Razin @ May 19 2005, 01:54 PM)
[strange indeed, huh? the guy is Sunni muslim which are backed up by US, and more than that - a member of Natioanl Assembly - also supported by US. why to fire at  him ?  blink.gif
surely - to make Iraq a safer place !  wink.gif
*


Well, the Sunnis are probably our least favorite of the 3 groups but we back all three. Sounds like a screw up by the military or BS from a Sunni. MARK
Ben-T
QUOTE (Razin @ May 20 2005, 12:19 AM)
ha! my point exactly !

why indeed ?

perhaps coz US makes it safe popcorn.gif

thanks for stating the obvious though  - that it is not safe !  rolleyes.gif
*


Okay, warzones are not safe places.

Now do you have some kind of point or were you just establishing what everybody already knew?
Razin
why, I thought the point is easy one : that they should make it safe, instead of simply saying some words that they do so ! wink.gif since they've taken upon themselves such a task.

P.S. seems like they make "safe" Afgan as well :

Taliban Still a Viable Force

QUOTE
U.S. commanders say the Taliban is a viable resistance force in    Afghanistan even three years after the Islamic radicals fell, but the U.S. military's fight to undermine their influence and bring stability is showing signs of progress



Afghan president 'shocked' by U.S. abuse report

QUOTE
KABUL, Afghanistan (Reuters) - Afghan President Hamid Karzai said on Saturday he was shocked by a U.S. Army report on abuse of detainees in     Afghanistan, saying his government wanted custody of all Afghan prisoners and control over U.S. military operations.

The abuse described in the report, including details of the deaths of two inmates at an Afghan detention center, happened in 2002 and emerged from a nearly 2,000-page file of U.S. Army investigators, The New York Times reported on Friday.

"It has shocked me thoroughly and we condemn it," Karzai said at a news conference. "We want the U.S. government to take very, very strong action, to take away people like that."

Karzai, a staunch ally in the U.S.-led war against terrorism, was due to leave on a U.S trip on Saturday and meet     President Bush for talks.......
Ben-T
How do you go about making it safe when the Insurgency can simply drive a car into a Shopping Bazaar and blow it up? There is no effective way to combat that kind of violence.

All that can really be done is to keep the relative peace and wait for a course of years until the last vestiges of the Insurgency fizzle out, transferring more and more of the responsibility of fighting this Insurgency to the Iraqi Government over time.

There is no effective way to swiftly fight destroy a guerilla military force. They last for a course of years, and then, if they meet with little success in accomplishing their goals, they eventually fizzle out and die. That is the only real way to stop them.
expat
QUOTE
How do you go about making it safe when the Insurgency can simply drive a car into a Shopping Bazaar and blow it up?


Well, the topic *is* "US making Iraq a safer place" and all.....
QUOTE
And all they can do is murder people. They are in there final death throes. The Nazis did the same type of thing at the end of WW2.


Haven;t the been saying that in Spain, say, for the last few decades? Couldn't you say the same thing about Hezbollah? How long has al Quieda been around?

Please - what evidence do you have that the Iraqi Insurgency will fizzle out and die? last I checked, there were still problems is Isreal - ever since Isreal got created. What makes you think that there isn't a large grop of people that view the US and Isreal similarly? What makes you think that there won't be attacks as long as the US is there?

Just curious.
dixon76710
QUOTE (Razin @ May 21 2005, 12:14 PM)
P.S. seems like they make "safe" Afgan as well :

[url=http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050521/ap_on_re_as/us_afghanistan_outlook
*



Safer and better. MARK

"Nearly two-thirds of Afghans (64%) interviewed said they rarely or never worry about their personal safety, while under the Taliban only 36% felt that way."
http://www.asiafoundation.org/Locations/af...tan_survey.html

And 56% said that things were better now than they were before the war.(IRAQ)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3514504.stm
Ben-T
QUOTE (expat @ May 22 2005, 02:56 AM)
Well,  the topic *is*  "US making Iraq a safer place"  and all..... 
Haven;t the been saying that in Spain,  say,  for the last few decades?  Couldn't you say the same thing about Hezbollah?  How long has al Quieda been around? 

Please - what evidence do you have that the Iraqi Insurgency will fizzle out and die?  last I checked,  there were still problems is Isreal - ever since Isreal got created.  What makes you think that there isn't a large grop of people that view the US and Isreal similarly?  What makes you think that there won't be attacks as long as the US is there? 

Just curious.
*


In there final death throes as a serious organization with a real chance of overthrowing the Iraqi government and taking power on a national scale.

As an organization that exists, yes of course they will be around for a long time.
Ben-T
The post this was originaly a response to has since been deleted.
Razin
QUOTE (expat @ May 22 2005, 09:56 AM)
Well,  the topic *is*  "US making Iraq a safer place"  and all..... 
Haven;t the been saying that in Spain,  say,  for the last few decades?  Couldn't you say the same thing about Hezbollah?  How long has al Quieda been around? 
.....
What makes you think that there isn't a large grop of people that view the US and Isreal similarly?  What makes you think that there won't be attacks as long as the US is there? 

Just curious.
*



exactly my point - that better not to make such a statement that "US makes Iraq safer" - untill and unless it is realy so; otherwise should ACT according to such statement to back it up by real facts, not simply by propagandistic words

so far the real facts say different:

Death Rate for Reservists in Iraq Rises

QUOTE
At least 21 part-time soldiers and Marines have died in May, although the number may be higher since the Pentagon has not yet identified most of the 14 U.S. troops who have died since Sunday.

The 21 deaths account for a little over one-third of the total of 58 U.S. troops who have died so far this month. That is about in line with the ratio of Guard and Reserve troops to regular active-duty troops deployed in Iraq — now about 40 percent Guard/Reserve and 60 percent regular troops.


9 U.S. Soldiers Killed in 2 Days in Iraq

QUOTE
In the last two days, the military announced that 14 American troops have been killed since Sunday. Those reports came as insurgents carried out a string of explosions, suicide attacks and drive-by shootings around the country that also killed 49 Iraqis.

At least 620 people, including 58 U.S. troops, have been killed since April 28, when Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari announced his new Shiite-dominated government


Surge in U.S. Deaths in Iraq Draws Concern

QUOTE
The deaths come at a time when American troops are trying to hand more responsibility to Iraq's fledgling security forces, part of the U.S. strategy to eventually leave Iraq.


perhaps there is kind of reluctance (or even planned actions against) "to hand more responsibility to Iraq's trrops" and "to eventually leave Iraq" , huh ?
dixon76710
Our opinion is of little relevance. MARK

And 56% said that things were better now than they were before the war.(IRAQ)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3514504.stm
dixon76710
QUOTE (Razin @ May 24 2005, 01:17 PM)
perhaps there is kind of reluctance (or even planned actions against) "to hand more responsibility to Iraq's trrops" and "to eventually leave Iraq" , huh ?
*



???? Let me see if I understand this theory of yours. The "Death Rate for Reservists in Iraq Rises", "9 U.S. Soldiers Killed in 2 Days in Iraq" and a "Surge in U.S. Deaths in Iraq" are all part of the US's "planned actions against" giving the Iraqi military more responsibility or the US leaving Iraq????? Amazing what the human mind can convince itself. MARK
Ben-T
Resistance to giving Iraq's their own responsibility?

Right, thats why an Iraqi elected government currently runs the country.

Thats why there are now more Iraqi Soldiers fighting in the Iraq was on the US side than American ones.

Thats why the US has already begun it's troop reduction campaign.
Razin
now it would be much safer very soon :

U.S. Launches Another Major Iraq Offensive

QUOTE
U.S. Marines clashed with and killed at least 10 suspected militants here on Wednesday as more than 1,000 American troops raided yet another city in western    Iraq, launching a major operation against insurgents and foreign fighters thought to be infiltrating from Syria.

The offensive, the second on a road to Damascus in less than a month, came as the Iraqi government demanded that Syria block insurgents from crossing the border. Iraq also asked the U.N. Security Council to renew its mandate for the 160,000 troops in the U.S.-led multinational force, saying it cannot fully defend itself alone.
...

On May 7, American forces launched a weeklong operation in the city of Qaim and other Iraqi towns near the Syrian border. The goal was to root out militants allied to Jordanian-born terrorist mastermind Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and to destroy their smuggling routes into Syria. At least 125 militants and nine U.S. Marines were killed in that operation, the military said.

Syria is under intense pressure from the United States and the Iraqi government to stop foreign fighters entering Iraq across their porous nearly 400-mile border.


would Syria be "pressed" further ? after all - WMDs allegedly were moved there after not being found in Iraq ! popcorn.gif could "kill 2 raqbbits" in one shot : stop the insurgency from Syria and consiquently, in Iraq.

but may be not just yet, coz if insergency stops - then will be no need for 160,000 "multinational" troops to stay any longer although they were requested to stay.

oh, and it is calculated that Peace in Iraq 'will take at least five years to impose' - sounds like a well planned project ! AT LEAST ! implies - it would take longer than 5 years to make Iraq safe, huh ? so, doubtfully MNF will hurry to leave soon and reconstruction hasten .... means - more moneys would be needed for maintainance of it, security etc.

QUOTE
The thinktank report points to US estimates that there are between 12,000 and 20,000 hardcore insurgents in Iraq. It says that Iraqi politicians have been keen to blame the rise in sectarian violence on foreign jihadists. "But they may have overstated their case."

Insurgents demonstrated their ability to hit US forces in the heart of the Iraqi capital yesterday when a military convoy was targeted by a car bomb, killing three US troops.....

Toby Dodge, senior fellow at the IISS and expert on Iraq, estimated yesterday that there were about 1,000 foreign fighters in Iraq "perfecting the use of car bombs" and causing more problems across the region, including Saudi Arabia. There seemed to be no "viable exit strategy" for foreign troops. 




yeah, well - then we only have to wait ! popcorn.gif
Ben-T
I didn't support the War on Iraq on WMD charges so that's an argument for you to take to somebody else.

Moving on.

Insurgencies take a long time to die off, that's a basic rule of warfare. There is rarely if ever such a thing as a short lived guerilla war.
expat
If you didn't support the war on WMD charges, why do you support that line of reasoning?
Ben-T
Because there was a strong case both for and against WMDs. I personally did not believe they would be found, but I am tired of stupid Hippies going "BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED!" There is very little evidence to suggest Bush deliberately lied.
Atruescot
QUOTE
Because there was a strong case both for and against WMDs. I personally did not believe they would be found, but I am tired of stupid Hippies going "BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED!" There is very little evidence to suggest Bush deliberately lied.


Ben-T

You are clearly a well educated, good debater but can you not see how wrong you are over this issue. I have read a few of your postings and you have always backed superiority and military intervention to resolve the Iraq issue. Fine.
People are dying, through this; right now as I write this and you read this peoples lives are being ended.

For what?

World peace?
An end to terrorism?
The spread of democracy?
The start of Utopia?

I could goggle and give links but I prefer my opinion as a "stupid Hippie".
Democracy, world peace, utopia does not come from the barrel of a gun and if you feel it does then I feel sorry for you and all the other pro-war advocates on this forum.
bob
QUOTE (Atruescot)
I feel sorry for you and all the other pro-war advocates on this forum.


Do you feel sorry for the people Saddam dipped in acid? Perhaps you should consider that before you reinstate him as president.
blink.gif

Scotty you simply slay me with your naivety.
Ben-T
Scott is a good guy. He quite simply is naive.

Scotty my personal reasons for supporting the Iraq War were the following.

A.) Make an example out of Saddam Hussein
B.) Give the US a strong tactical position in the Middle East
C.) Further the Bush Doctrine's plan of Strategic Middle East democratization
D.) A percieved threat (at the time I didn't think they were there, but knew it was quite possible that they were.)
bob
And the preemptive strategy on the war on terror does indeed seem to be working. Does it not?
So what if a Koran or two gets pissed on in the process. tongue.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.