What is up with that CRAZY Georgia bee itch who LIED to the FBI about being ABDUCTED and kidnapped from the Atlanta suburbs in a van and driven to New Mexico?

Turns out she is a BIG FAT LIAR.

Think for one second if this priveledged REPUBLICAN was BLACK or GAY or Muslim, or some kind of known leftist ... she would be in JAIL!

Instead, everyone is all sweetness and understanding, and NO CHARGES.

If you doubt what I am saying that this is white, heterosexual, right wing PRIVELEDGE, you are sadly BLIND.

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/metro/gwin...banksfound.html

Calm yourself down TQ. Getting all worked up over this woman, Hell any woman for that matter, is sure to get you some curious looks. She is probably just scared spitless, thinking that she just might be getting a bum deal with her future hubby. Who knows, he may even be checking YOU out and failed to notice that she DID notice.

Let's wait and see how things shake out. Perhaps she was down there actually looking for a REAL man for her future. But patience on your part is advised. And if things fail to work out with them, perhaps you can write him and become a future pen pal.

You don't get it!
This irresponsible CRIMINAL women wasted probably hundreds of thousands of dollars of police time with her HOAX. Then she lied to the FBI and she is off SCOTT FREE.
Any honest person will realize she is getting this baby treatment because she is a WHITE, WEALTHY, REPUBLICAN, and HETEROSEXUAL.
Picture the same scenario yet the criminal is BLACK, POOR, DEMOCRAT, and GAY.
Major jail time. Admit it.

Oh, Foof! Now you are becoming hysterical TQ. I am sure that she does not carry around a Democratic Party Security Card. And as for the homosexual part, most people don't skip around broadcasting there sexual proclivities. Unless they are trolling for new trophies.

Spoken like a true proponent of this sort of unfair bias against minorities.
Happily, some people are seeing the light.
There is the beginning of an outcry in Atlanta to PRESS CHARGES against this criminal, or at the very least, send her a BILL for the police time.
What do you want to bet that this does not happen?
I bet she goes ahead and marries that good old boy cracker just to diffuse the controversy. Divorce is so easy anyway.
Sanctity of marriage!
Yeah right.

Then why is your 'twit' in such a 'twat' over marriage rights for you and your future passing acquaintances? If it is so superficial, you would not be panting and howling so loud to get this "worthless" privilege.

Consider yourself lucky that you are not part of this charade.

Your "logic" as usual is twisted.
Heterosexual marriage in America is a joke. Divorce rate something like 50 percent. Any drunk and a junkie can get married in 5 minutes anywhere in the country, no questions asked, as long as they have different tools between their legs.
Yet radical right wing religious zealots want to deny the CHOICE to a whole class of tax paying citizens saying gays threaten the sanctity of marriage, when straights have already messed it up themselves. To blame the problems on gays is basically hateful SCAPEGOATING.

Why would you wish to have a 'so called' right that would ensure you a 90+% failure rate? That would gain you something to crow about. As for me, I really don't care whether or not you are allowed to make it legal.

But I warn you that you should be careful of just what you are wishing for. Lesbians are not what I am thinking of, but male homosexuals. Since males are by far the more promiscuous of the two sexes, the wonan part of the equation is a "civilizing" factor, and tends to keep the other half from resorting to barbarian behavior.

If you couple two promiscuous males together legally, you are going to be asking for REAL trouble. And don't argue this fact with me, because I am around many male homosexuals, being in the Interior Design field. I will guarantee that the failure rate that you so loudly "tut tut" the normal crowd, will be off the chart if you folks are admitted into the "marriage" club. You may wish to rethink your "rethinking" here.

TQ, I will agree with you first, and then disagree second. There are heterosexuals doing far worse damage to marriage than any homosexual. Hollywood "marriages" are often just to keep someone's name in the spotlight if their career is starting to slide downhill. You are right; there are many more factors to include when talking about the downward slide.

However, you are wrong to justify gay marriage by citing the problems with heterosexuals. You cannot justify one wrong by pointing to another and hope people get distracted. Whether you are trying to distract or not, the argument of "two wrongs" isn't logical.

Marriage is all about religion. Also, marriage isn't just a word. Otherwise, as JohnL and many other conservatives have pointed out, gays would be fine with civil unions. Marriage has a definition. This definition arises out of religious beliefs and organizations. Therefore, changing the definition of marriage through government is unconstitutional.

TQ, if you petition the government for the secular rights that married couples have, it would be constitutional. I would even support you. I realize that civil unions have damaged marriage rates in other countries because heterosexuals also apply for them instead of marriage. However, I say let them have it. Marriage will be more sanctified in my eyes if those who want civil unions instead of marriage are allowed to have it.

Since I'm about letting people make their own choices, I say civil unions are fine. Since I'm against the federal government telling me what my religion is, I'm against gay marriage. Do you have a problem with that stance? If so, why?

Reading ThaiQuilla's posts in this thread are so entertaining. I can't even think of anything to say, it's just too funny.

As far as civil unions versus marriage, in theory, that is fine, as long as the civil unions carry ALL of the state, federal, immigration, and international rights and priveledges of marriage. In reality, that is completely impractical. You would be forcing individual couples to personally litigate to the get the rights they need. I absolutely think you are FULL OF IT to suggest that marriage is RELIGIOUS. YOU CAN GET MARRIED IN CITY HALL! If you want to use a church, you can do that too. The opposition to gay marriage is basically people putting down a minority, and over time, this will be ruled unconstitutional, just as was SLAVERY.

Back to the Georgia BEE ITCH. Did you hear the 911 call? Do you realize she ACCUSED a HISPANIC man of ABDUCTING her? Not a white man, mind you. Does anyone still doubt my assertion that this CRIMINAL is getting a pass because of her skin color and social priveledge? I haven't heard peep one to deny it.

Yes Massur!
How about treating gay men as adults and let them make their own adult decisions just as you are allowed to do?
They will enjoy or suffer the consequences just as you do, just as they are obligated to pay their taxes without being granted their civil rights.
Thank you Massur, you are so wise!
Disgusting that a JEW is so active in voicing suppression of another hated minority.

[quote=Thaiquila,May 1 2005, 04:23 AM]
Then why is your 'twit' in such a 'twat' over marriage rights for you and your future passing acquaintances? If it is so superficial, you would not be panting and howling so loud to get this "worthless" privilege.

Consider yourself lucky that you are not part of this charade.

[/quote]
Yes Massur!
How about treating gay men as adults and let them make their own adult decisions just as you are allowed to do?
They will enjoy or suffer the consequences just as you do, just as they are obligated to pay their taxes without being granted their civil rights.
Thank you Massur, you are so wise!
Disgusting that a JEW is so active in voicing suppression of another hated minority.

[/quote]

Jeeze Dude!! Chill out. Get some help.

Check out the rant and rave section of craiglist Atlanta.
The people there are saying EXACTLY the same things I am saying.
She is getting the WHITE PASS.
Not one person here has offered an argument to deny it.

http://atlanta.craigslist.org/rnr

rofl this ###### is just too funny.

Thaiquila, I think your lust to see whitey get some is clouding your perception.
The expense incurred by the Georgia authorities was in response to a missing person, NOT a false report of a crime. Its not a crime to pick up and take off across the country without tellling your mom, dad and boyfriend.
Sounds like her false report of a crime existed for just a couple hours in New Mexico. She could and may be charged for making a false report of a crime in New Mexico and be responsible for the couple hours of New Mexico police running around looking for a blue van.
I believe the bit about hispanics was to her husband, not to the police. Nobody made reports to the FBI.
It has nothing to do with her being white. College girl Audrey Seiler in Wisconsin was a whitey and they socked it to her good for her false report. But she actually falsely created the appearrance of a crime complete with supplying the rope and duct tape for her imajinary crime. MARK

Nix, nay, nein, Otto. You are new here and are not familiar with TQ. The very last thing anyone, including yourself, would actually want is for him to meet Prince Valium. He is at his best when his emotional condition is at full "tilt".

And note, that TQ is one of the three most active members here on this forum. He is a jewl of the Jordon River, so to speak, although he has probably never been to the land of Abraham.

but life without TQ would be like life without,..without,......without,................well, you get the point.

Keep 'em commin' TQ. We all love ya' here. Honest injun'.

No, I am mereley pointing out the HYPOCRISY of the white, Christian, heterosexual, republican RULING CLASS.

There is evidence now that the loony lady PREMEDITATED this, buying the ticket many days in advance of her fun run.

You are completely wrong about the Hispanic issue. She was recorded on her 911 call claiming the assailant was HISPANIC. We can also presume she told the FBI this.

The crime is clearly in her FALSE REPORT over 911 and to the FBI (a serious federal crime). She cost her Georgia community many thousands of tax dollars, that may or may not be criminal, but it is disgusting, and if you weren't all hypocrites, you would see that your right wing law and order ethic needs to be applied to all kinds of criminals. An example needs to be made of her.

Yes, she needs therapy. She also needs a jail cell.

OH, BTW, I have a new theory about this case. Atlanta, being the US capital of black power, has a delicate situation with race relations. The sentiment I am expressing, that the BEE ITCH is getting a rich white girl pass, is starting to pick up major steam there, and if something isn't done to slap her, there will be hell to pay. So I now think there will be some kind of consequence for her, which there bloody well should be, but still I doubt she will go to jail.

If an adult homosexual goes away from his/her mate and doesn't tell anyone where they are going (because they don't want anyone to know where they are going). Then the rest of the world jumps through their collective A holes about it, spend butt loads of money, involving Federal agencies, trying to find them. And then, to end the fiaso, the offending homosexual reports that everyone is right all along, and that they (the offending party) have, in fact, been abducted as everyone suspected, to help them (the aquaintances) save face. Should the offending homosexual be responsible for the cost of his/her A hole jumping aquaintances?

Why is it differentiated in this thread for homo, hetero, bi, tri, poli, mono, celi, etc. people?

If there is any fault here, it should go to those who raised a false alarm, albeit with reasonable suspicion. It was a false alarm. This Woman didn't raise any alarm. This woman didn't call for help.

The only thing I see here is, possibly, breach of contract for evading a verbal agreement to marry. She did lie to the FBI and Local Authorities but that was the cheap bit.

Just a few thoughts.

I was listening to Jeraldo Rivera and he was stating the the authorities were going to charge her something like perhaps $9,000 plus community service, or something like that. I think she will be forced to get up in front of crowds and acknowledge her utter stupidity with regards to her actions.

Since she is alive and everyone is so mad at here, does this mean that we were hoping to find here practicing her breast stroke in some fish farm?

The blindness continue.
You hypocrites do not see the power of class in America.
Or, more likely, you do see it, and you APPROVE of the double standards.
BTW: Legal people are now saying she committed a FELONY.
My, you conservatives get awfully LIBERAL when the accused is one of your own!
Incredible.

Hey TQ. Took me awhile to get back to your response to me. I apologize.

I made a new topic about marriage here because I figured it was a little off-topic.

Check it out and let me know what you think about my idea.


As to the "BEE ITCH":
If she falsely reported a crime I want her charged and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I support fines, jail, etc.

However, it sounds like there is some discrepancy as to whether or not she faked a crime or just left. If the husband reported her missing, then no crime was committed.

No discrepancy at all.
She is recorded on a call to 911 that she was abducted by two people with GUNS, the man being HISPANIC, all LIES.
Thus, a false report of a crime.

Hate to spoil your party, Thaiquila, but....



Happy now? Read the article here!

Hey, Thaiquila, do you know what a Rorschach test is? You're such a funny little guy! Always wailing and screeching, constantly seeing the world through such subjective eyes.... SO ENTERTAINING!

There is nothing illegal about an adult leaving the people they know without saying where they are going or reporting in at any kind of interval. Even if they believe that the people they know are in distress about where they may be.

If she wouldn't have said HEY!!! here I am..in the particular way that she did. Then there would be absolutely nothing illegal about what she did. But it would have cost a lot more money with no one to blame.

Just think how much it would have cost if she didn't let it end so easy? How much would it have cost if she had just kept quiet and stayed away? How much longer would they have looked?

Agreed. The crime was the false report of an ARMED abduction by a HISPANIC man to the 911 line and the United States FBI.
She is a felon. He fiance is crazier than she is.

Who left the burr under TQ's bonnet today?
Heck maybe it's an everyday thang!

I'm very happy she will be charged. She reported a fake crime. It cost money, and it diverted police resources from helping others that might actually be in trouble. Maximum penalty? I wouldn't be sad if she got it, but if I were the judge, I'd probably give her the maximum fine with an average to low amount of jail time.

First it was because she was a "priveledged REPUBLICAN" and NOT "BLACK or GAY or Muslim, or some kind of known leftist"
Now its a "class" thing??? or do you consider a black, gay, Muslim, leftist Democrat to be void of class? MARK

Of course not.
In America today, the only first class citizens are white Christian republicans, because the country is now ruled by the radical right wing Christians.
If you doubt this, notice how people get off crimes and reduced sentencing by parading their Christianity.
All OTHERS, including blacks, gays, Muslims, leftist democrats (who are often Jews), are not first class citizens in America.
This is wrong.

Its called a plea bargain TQ, and many people who are neither Christian or Republican use this option.