Stupid, stupid American voters.
Now they are really going to pay.
Sandra, the swing justice, has resigned and everyone knows quite well that cretin bush is going to push an ultra radical right wing candidate, someone who is anti legal abortion, anti gay, anti civil liberties, anti stem cell research, you name it.
I now say this in advance.
You right wingers are SHAMELESS HYPOCRITES on this issue.
You railed and whined about ACTIVIST JUDGES but now here is your chance to get the ultimate ACTIVIST JUDGE and ###### if you aren't going to fight for that.
Will crappy president bush win this major victory?
Probably, but not without a very visible BATTLE ROYALE and he is going to pay for it in 06 when the stupid, stupid American voters finally realize the raw deal that they got.
Full Version: Sandra Day O'Conner Resigns
Bush was very clear in both the 2000 and 2004 elections in that he would appoint conservative judges. Thats what the majority of Americans want. MARK
QUOTE (Thaiquila @ Jul 1 2005, 03:00 PM)
Stupid, stupid American voters.
Now they are really going to pay.
Sandra, the swing justice, has resigned and everyone knows quite well that cretin bush is going to push an ultra radical right wing candidate, someone who is anti legal abortion, anti gay, anti civil liberties, anti stem cell research, you name it.
I now say this in advance.
You right wingers are SHAMELESS HYPOCRITES on this issue.
You railed and whined about ACTIVIST JUDGES but now here is your chance to get the ultimate ACTIVIST JUDGE and ###### if you aren't going to fight for that.
Will crappy president bush win this major victory?
Probably, but not without a very visible BATTLE ROYALE and he is going to pay for it in 06 when the stupid, stupid American voters finally realize the raw deal that they got.
Now they are really going to pay.
Sandra, the swing justice, has resigned and everyone knows quite well that cretin bush is going to push an ultra radical right wing candidate, someone who is anti legal abortion, anti gay, anti civil liberties, anti stem cell research, you name it.
I now say this in advance.
You right wingers are SHAMELESS HYPOCRITES on this issue.
You railed and whined about ACTIVIST JUDGES but now here is your chance to get the ultimate ACTIVIST JUDGE and ###### if you aren't going to fight for that.
Will crappy president bush win this major victory?
Probably, but not without a very visible BATTLE ROYALE and he is going to pay for it in 06 when the stupid, stupid American voters finally realize the raw deal that they got.
That comment is a big smelly sack of excrement, and you know it!
Americans DO NOT want Roe vs Wade to be overturned. Not by a long shot.
And that is the key prize the wacko right wing conservative wing wants to win with the new justices.
Americans DO NOT want Roe vs Wade to be overturned. Not by a long shot.
And that is the key prize the wacko right wing conservative wing wants to win with the new justices.
QUOTE (Thaiquila @ Jul 1 2005, 06:43 PM)
That comment is a big smelly sack of excrement, and you know it!
Americans DO NOT want Roe vs Wade to be overturned. Not by a long shot.
And that is the key prize the wacko right wing conservative wing wants to win with the new justices.
Americans DO NOT want Roe vs Wade to be overturned. Not by a long shot.
And that is the key prize the wacko right wing conservative wing wants to win with the new justices.
It would be far better for Roe v Wade to be overturned even for you guys.
First, each state would be able to decide, and at the time of the decision, almost 1/3 of the states either had oked abortion, or were in the process. This was in the time span of only a couple of years. If the states made the decision, at least half would be abortion states, and there would be no real contention.
This is the best option, and it does not curtail the power of the individual states. You folks on the left would be better off without Roe v Wade. I'm serious.
Women would NOT be better off, especially low income women.
QUOTE (Thaiquila @ Jul 1 2005, 07:14 PM)
Women would NOT be better off, especially low income women.
Not so! There would be more than enough people willing to help poor women. And what is so terrible about having a child and assuming responsibility for it?
And since there are so many drugs that are available for "morning after" in the pike, anyone who allows that to happen has more of a problem than a pregnacy. They need a new mind.
You worry too much TQ. The good news is that all the bad news is wrong!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.