This is no surprise to anyone who watched that sorry show of a speech.
The same old same old tired lies and the same old same old invalid ties to 911.
The American people have finally realized what a sham bush is. Even the red staters have turned against him.

I ask again, what took you, stupid, stupid, American voters?

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2005/06/...shs_speech.html

Yeah, they're all stupid and you are all brilliant. Sounds totally elitist to me. Must mean that you are so G-ddamned superior to the rest of America, right.

You're priceless TQ. I think I know where your head resides when you aren't sitting on it.

I am pretty sure based on your politics that you don't serious believe that all people are equal.
I don't either.
I do believe in equal rights to everyone though.

WE are born equal before G-d and the Law. That is what the Constitution is really saying. Of course you Collectivists are all for Egalitarianism instead.

Your problem is that you think that those who do not agree with you are stupid. And don't argue this because I can go back and with little time, pull up some of your little elitist jems. And they are right there within the first two or three weeks of my membership here.

You are merciless with how you slung around the "Idiot" and "stupid" words. That is seriously condescending and holier than thou, and you know it.

Typical TQ

Let me clarify.
I do indeed think that the majority of people who voted for bush are stupid because I have come the logical conclusion that it is irrational to support a cause AGAINST YOUR OWN SELF INTEREST.

It is quite clear who bush really represents (a very small number of elite rich Americans).

On more specific issues, such as is lasagne tastier than spaghetti, I certainly don't think people who disagree with me are stupid.

So ... it depends.

Can someone explain Zogby's logic?
"The Zogby America survey of 905 likely voters, conducted from June 27 through 29, 2005"

Bush spoke at 8pm on the 28th, so likely only 1/3rd of those asked over the 3 days were asked AFTER the President even gave the speech. And on the 3rd day of polling after the speech-

"voter approval of his job performance at 45% in the final day of polling" and yet Zogby concludes "Bush Job Approval Unchanged by War Speech"?????????

Not surprised the stupid stupid Thai queen swallowed every inch with passionate glee. MARK

Not Thai the last time I checked my passport.

Like I said, cant judge the reaction to Bushs speech by interviewing people before he gives the speech. If they had simply waited until after the speech, they probably would have picked up the 4% change that Galup did. MARK


http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq.htm

But them you would have missed the standard old pat knee jerk liberal reaction. It's truly amazing how these imbeciles think they can influence public opinion through this knee jerk prattle. As we saw during the 2004 elections the majority of the people are not fooled by these liberal lemmings flying into their irrational oblivion.
They are so blinded with hatred that they can't see how ignorant their bullshit really is.

TQ wrote:



Logical conclusion, eh? More like twisted thought processes to reach a conclusion you already wanted to reach.

A couple news flashes, TQ. First, there is not a single politician in the WORLD who doesn't represent a small number of elitests. If you deny this, you are as stupid as you claim others to be.

Second, you do not hold a monopoly on logic. With the posts you have been putting up since my short time here, I can see you don't even have a tiny corner of logic.

Now, to slap you with a scientific fact. Logic is NOT infallible. For logic to be entirely correct in it's conclusion you have to have every little bit of important information wieghed correctly for logic to work. The pure and simple truth is that unless you are omniscient (you are not) you will never, ever have infallible logic.

Your arrogance is not surpising, seeing as how you are a leftist.

You are totally wrong.
There are indeed political leaders in the world that represent a wider constituency than bush in their countries.
We certainly have examples in the US as well: FDR comes to mind.
In today's world, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil comes to mind.
You can call me stupid all you want.
I still contend American voters are stupid for voting against their self interest.

If I recall, only 2 other Presidents in the last century recieved a higher percetage of votes than Bush.
And you have a different opinion of what is in our "self interest" than most Americans. Not surprising that a Thai homosexual thinks differently than the average Amercan. MARK

I question your statistics.
Prove it with a source please.
Yes, this is all about opinion.
I am not Thai, not that being Thai is a bad thing.
FDR gave us social security. bush wants to destroy it. The people are still with FDR on that one. Now, that was a president!

TQ wrote:


Thaiquila, I didn't call you stupid. I called you arrogant.

But I know it is the leftist ideology possessing you that drives your attempt to put words in my mouth.

TQ also wrote:


If you actually think he isn't more interested into those who have granted him political power, then go ahead and keep those blinders on.

Besides, what makes other rulers any more sanctioned than Bush? Popular opinion has little do with it. Popular opinion has caused some of the worse atrocities in the world.

OH, I get it now. You think ANY ruler is more sanctioned than Bush, because anybody who doesn't agree with you is stupid and therefore doesn't count. Your constituency only applies to those who share your conclusions. The world is bigger than you, TQ.

I feel sorry for you.

And to add to what you said, so that people won't get blind-sided with your half-truth. FDR did give us social security, yes. But he never intended for it to become an entitlement program costing the tax-payers such a large part of the national budget. It is now a behemoth, and I'll wager the farm that he would be appalled at what the socialist-clothed-in-Democrat/Republican garb have morphed it into.

Sorry, looks like he is from thailand and a senior member of the thailand forum and the gay thailand forum. MARK