Several years ago, Vice President Al Gore went up against one of the biggest morons in American political history - and lost. Frankly, I think it's pretty obvious the treasonous jackal wasn't trying to win.

Five years ago, John Kerry also lost to Bush. Which campaign was worse - Gore's or Kerry's - is hard to say.

Now the corporate media are trumpeting Hillary Clinton as the Great Hope for 2008.

Reality Check: Many of Bush's most disastrous programs are merely continuations of programs that were started under Bilary. Bill Clinton sold us out to the World Trade Organization. Public education was largely privatized under Clinton. And Clinton failed miserably at election reform, leaving the barn doors open for George W. Bush, who in turn left the barn doors open for a mob of terrorists on September 11, 2001.

And have you noticed that Bill Clinton has been awfully chummy with George Bush Sr. lately?

I don"t know if Howard Dean is another corporate operative or not, but he was the obvious choice last time around. The same corporate media that helped dig his grave are now promoting Hillary. I don't buy it.

As far as I'm concerned, the Clinton's, Kerry's and Gore's are all traitors.

We will see.
Dean won't run this time.
If it is Hillary vs McCain, I will listen to what McCain has to say, which means he has a small chance of actually getting my vote.
I can't think of another republican that I can say that about.
I think McCain can beat Hillary, but I don't see any other republican that can.

Yes but by the standards you seem to apply the Founding Fathers would all be traitors.

Your litmus test for treason seems to be whether or not big business in someway benefitted. If it did, it was treason.

But what happens if McCain defects and joins the Democrats? Hillary/McCain 08 or McCain/Hillary 08!