You might find yourself seeing a very good movie, and you might even learn something.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?.../e103217S10.DTL


BTW, bush, a dedicated RANCHER and a movie fan, has not seen this very popular movie which is about RANCHING in the WEST.
Why do you think that is?

Of course, SoLo shouldn't bother seeing it. She is likely to conclude that all gay ranchers are child molesters or something like that, and continue to poisen her gay patients with her insane therapies.

TQ, you are going over the line here. You were banned once before, remember? And it was by popular demand that you were allowed to return. Your treatment of SoloNav here is disgusting, and you should stop it immediately.

If you don't like what she says, then place her on the "Ignore" status, just as she has done with you.

Seriously, your conduct here is deplorable and you are acting as if you want to be shown the door once again.

I would hate to see you leave here. So act civilized for a change. You have been getting more disgusting with your language of late. Are you interested in maintaining such a low reputation that you are carving out for yourself?

Again, Stop It! Ok?

Whodehell popularly demanded that he come back?

Cattle ranchers and sheep herders dont mix. MARK

No way, Jose.
If anyone should be BANNED, it should be SoloNav, for incredibly vile and outrageous
made up, libelous, personal charges against me without any evidence whatsoever of their verity.

So you liked the dick flic?

I laughed out loud when I read this:
"The only people who would have problems with it are people who are very insecure about themselves and their own sexuality and who would be putting up a defense, and that's usually young men who haven't figured things out yet."

I wonder if she would consider no interest a problem. Is it just me or is there implied pressure to see this movie, along with the expectation that you love it? Ahhh! diversity and tolerance what a crock.

I have seen Gays who were just as racist and bigoted as the best of them.

It alright Stealth.
You don't want to see the movie.
Your loss.
Whatever.

Solo, there were a lot of people here who petitioned to have him reinstated. If you go back and read some posts, they are there.


TQ, you have gone over the top, and it is time for you to be put in your place. What I find interesting is how you constantly push the "margin" until you are almost over the edge. It is in your nature. You're a natural born exhibitionist, and it tends to get you into trouble.

Look, you have taken it way too far. I am not kidding you here. I have supported you in the past, but not on this on. You owe Solo an appology for your continued escalation of insults.

I'm serious.

I believe you are serious.
And you too are a serious bigot, if you consider my playful banter about the beauty of young men is more offensive than libelous personal totally imagined and made up charges from the insane, dangerous "therapist" lady.
Really, if you were at all objective, you would seeking that she be banned.

I would strongly suggest that you cut back on your enflamed rheteric here TQ. First, you KNOW that I am not a Bigot, so cut out the Bullsh!t, ok?

And cut out the crap with Solo. If you don't like what she has to say, simply ignore her. I know that this is hard to do, but you had better learn to, or it may be you on the outside looking in.

Where is your request that she apologize to me?
Was I not PROVOKED by her lies?
Basically, she started it, and you want ME to apologize.
Can you see why I think you are biased?
So, you think fags should just bend over take it?
Not this fag.

Alright. You have used up all my good will on your first Amendment rights here TQ. I will not be standing up for you unless you change your mind. I mean it! And I suspect you will need all the friends you can get.

Good luck.

Well, thank you so much.
I would really like to think how YOU would feel, if this twisted lady made up such outrageous, totally unsubstantiated personal charges against you.

No loss, the hetero complex side goes for traditional fair. I have no desire to explore the inner most working of a male gay relationship, especially, when it is written from the mind of a woman. Where is the insight in that? I did see a movie some years ago, "Bound" I think it was called, with Jennifer Tilly. I enjoyed that movie. The lesbian relationship in that love story was about trust and loyalty in the face shared danger. Besides, the sex scene were hot, LOL.

Yes, Thaiquila has a temper, and he can be more than just nasty. However, there is such a thing as provocation, and SoloNav accused Thaiquila of wanting to molest very young male children. The therapist, in effect, says he's the rapist. Therapist, the rapist, get the joke? But of course, there's absolutely nothing funny about it.

Gentlemen, imagine that YOU have just been called a rapist of little tiny preschool boys, or a rapist of little tiny preschool girls. How civil would you be toward the woman who behaves so unladylike?

Yes, if you're going to ban Thaiquila, you should call for equal fairness or 'justice' in dealing with SoloNav.

Surely none of us defends Thaiquila for outrageous behavior, but he clearly was provoked in this case, by SoloNav.

More lies and twisting of truth on your part, Fit. Where was TQ accused of raping little tiny preschool boys, or being a rapist of little tiny preschool girls? How civily should I act towards someone who accuses me of that untruth? Why not deal in facts?

Can neither of you read? What was written?

The provocation comes from his continual drip of lurid comments about young men and their body parts, with the last one I've read being very disgusting. And, MY comments are based upon his past ones, on this forum and on AI-Jane, which again you have not been around to read. These aren't fiction, nor are they lies. The way he is posting now is his USUAL way of posting, with a different target each time. This is nothing new for TQ. What you've been seeing up to now is just his vanilla act that he uses before escalating to his present (normal) level. He is an lurid exhibitionist, and frankly I'm sick of it. I put them together into one post to call him what I think he is. I've heard he was posting male pornography the last time he was banned from this site. All of his posts were removed, I believe. ANd, I believe one involved Christ???? Go over to AI-Jane to see what's there.......

I can see you do not bother to read before accusing. You are speaking from ignorance. Your partiality is showing. Shall I say your bgiotry is showing?

Personally I think you're both behaving like children,
but I wouldn't wish to see either of you banned

Mutual apologies, kiss and make up?!?

TQ - see post #22 and beyond here for my take on the movie and remit.

Thanks, MLT. I've just grown tired of the continual insults and finally responded. I see it more like someone finally popped Gollum in the nose, with the someone being me.

Edited Note: TQ has removed offending wording

Time to kill this thread...it serves no purpose

You're probably right. Humpback Mountain is not a subject that is dear to the minds of the overwhelming majority of members here, with one possible exception. And then it permits one of us to prance around and expose his "backside" to one and all.

Yes, why not close this vile thread, soonest!