Bush slides to new lows

Even fox viewers want him to go !

Transparent trolling by TQ.

That's the guy that was banned after he was libelled. Not me buddy.

lostrl has been a member here since sept 05. Unless you have proof move along. Seems like you're the one tat's doing the trolling

Congressional support is even lower, including the Dems.............government, et al, is held in low opinion. This isn't germain to Bush alone. Your point?

Read the link

"PRESIDENT BUSH – Overall Job Rating"

As to the veracity of this opportunitist’s transparant idelogically motivated post, like the Congressional Democratic delegation’s laughing and gleefully cheering that Social Security has NOT BEEN FIXED, last night, shows that truth and evidence are not necessarily mutually exclusive and are, in fact, beholding to the minds eye of the viewer. Hey!

Factually, George Bush’s popularity, as evidenced by the link especially when NOT viewed from a one time isolationist’s narrow minded ideology, shows over the entire time span, this hypthetical diatribe about Bush, is, in fact, NOT accuarate. As the numbers, in total, show he is no more Seriously Unpopular today than he was back in August 2005.

The evidence in the link shows Truthfully, in continuance and in average of comparability over the entire period, Bush’s “Approval rating” averaged 40.8155%, round to the nearest, equals 41%.

While, likewise, Bush’s “Disapproval rating” has averaged 54.30769, rounded to nearest, equals 54%.

Meantime, not significantly nor inconsquencial, over the same period of time, the UNSURE VOTE has averaged 5.661538%, rounded to the nearest, that equals 6%.

Furthermore, nearly all these polls given their standard disclaimers in their use of small sample size, have a + or – 3% ,on average, error potential.

George Bush is seriously unpopular?

Who says that? As far as I know, he was elected with a huge majority by the American people for a second term.

Not only a slim majority, but a majority unusually strong, enough to win even any election by strict European standard.

Considering the diversity in the USA, such a great election result is not easy.

He is now in his final term, he cannot be removed now. He cannot run another term however, so up to the American voter to decide for the new president in a few years.

Popular or unpopular is no question at this moment. What the US-president decides, has to be respected and his orders have to be carried out.

Good to see you back Yohan.

But seriously, you are using logic here, and logic is in short supply within the Fringe Left Wing Kook crowd. What is so important is that they have been crying and railing for over five years now, along with the MSM, and STILL this is all they have accomplished. This tells more about their strength and popularity than that of Bush, don't you think?


It must be terrible to know that you no longer have majority power. Oh, and it is no fun either. Just a cursory look at the few Kooks here will reveal this quite easily.

They have to wait up to 2008.

After that we will see, IF they are successful, power has to be transferred in 2008 - but again, I am not so sure about it. It is still to early however, now is 2006 and we do not know, who will be the candidates.

For sure, G. W. Bush will be out, as a 3rd term is not permitted.

The rule, which is out of question, says 4 years x 2 times...therefore this US president will remain in power up to 2008 and his orders have to be respected up to that date - If he is 'seriously unpopular' in January 2006 is not relevant and will not change anything.

Should be clear to everybody, or not?

P.S. We have similar talks here in Japan about Premiere Minister Koizumi - everyday...he is extremely unpopular....however he has been elected with an unusual big majority....
He is the strong man here in Japan for the majority of the Japanese people.

The USA and even Europe are not against him either, and what the 2 Koreas, Taiwan, or Communist China are thinking about him is not really that important.
We in Japan are not supposed to receive and execute 'orders' from Communist China.

Despite they hate us so much, every day 1000s of Chinese are lining up the Japanese Consulates in China for a Japanese visa.
The same is true also for the US-Consulates ....despite G. W. Bush is ruining the world, plenty of ordinary people are dreaming about immigration to the United States.

Yeah, it is simply amazing to realize that so many fortunate people are flocking overseas in order to endure tyranny, isn't it?

I'm kind of glad we have a president who isn't necessarily out to win popularity contests; but rather is content to stick on principle for the long-term good of the nation.

If blessed by the gods of the sea, a course laid straight and narrow in calm seas and nice winds may take a vessel on a fast and steady course from port to port.

Yet, a course in rough seas and ill winds, not so well blessed by good fortune, may by tack and tussle, make its way from port to port to the same end and result with the issue of difference being but time and good fortune, not success or failure. Hey mate!

This has got to be the most idiotic thing ever said here. Let's all think like Britney Spears.

Even more idiotic is the tendency of some to reject ideas merely because the progenitors of those ideas have an "R" next to their name.

What are you talking about??? Any President reguardless of what letter is next to his name should have everything they say or any action they take, scrutinized through a microscope. If you don't question anything, why think after you voted. Take your brain out, leave on the shelf until the next election.

Assuming one has a grasp of the system of statutory governance within the United States of America, maybe one should DO ALL THAT BEFORE they vote. Thusly afterwards, maybe they should grasp the fundamental requirement to rightly tolerate the peculiar fact that in the Unites States of America a plurality is the means by which we unquestionably make decisions as to governance and as such to national policies.

It is, after the plurality of voters have clearly spoken in electoral democracy, that one, as a mere voter, should realize it is the legitimate framework stipulated within the constitution that is designated as the appropriate means to equalize the bona fides and accuracy of those designated by election to govern not minority mob rule of loud voices.

As such a voter should reserve their discontent, in fundamentally failing to effectively promote their ideas and visions to the plurality of constituents, by permitting the constitutional framework set aside to deal with the acceptability and relevant reasonableness of the elected administration in designated means and ways.

They may, instead, desire, alternatively, to rally and seek an effective ballot results more to their preference and liking preferably jus pos to incessantly whining about their failures by finding fault in those that could not defeat in the broader fray of ideas and visions when they had an opportune to do so.

We do not use street or mob rule and or minority voices of malcontent nor the capricious nature of news that encourages opinion poll imbalances to determine or arbitrary dictate governance within the United States. To achieve that means of post election thinking, one would eventually need to go south, way south, or east, or way east, to find that means of governance change. hey!

What It's Like To Be George Bush

"On the subject of headlines and buried leads, just imagine that your local newspaper, read by everyone you know, wrote a story saying that you were accused of some horrible act – let’s say rape for the men, child beating for the women. Imagine that the headline and opening dozen paragraphs of the story herald the accusations made against you. Then in the thirteenth paragraph of the story they say that DNA tests have cleared you of the rape (for the men) or that an investigation had found no evidence of child abuse (for the women). Let’s say that your local television news picks up the story, and reports the accusations, but doesn’t bother to report the DNA or investigation results. That is what George Bush must feel like everyday."

Couldn't have said it better myself - GWB is getting hosed!

Link

George W's decisions should be looked at through a microscope...but not a fun-house mirror, or the skewed perceptions of someone who is insanely jealous.

KenBean

are you inferring that anyone in thier right OR wrong mind would be so stupid as to wish that they were George W. Bush at this time?

I just get tired of seeing Haupt's post as the last one, so here it is.

Concerning Bush, his polls are higher than those of the present Congress.

Here here!

Unfortunately some from the same crowd that cries (boo hoo) about those who have more than them will say he is motivated by greed and nothing more than greed. Sad really.

It is good to see a President that campaigns on specific principle and then actually follows through on those principles with total disregard for what the media feeds to the masses.

Heard a program this a.m. on the history channel regarding Lincoln.........situation identical to Bush's. "He was determined to finish the war despite opposition from both the public and the Congress. He was a very unpopular president at the time, and faced extreme opposition."

Hmmmmmmmm.

Some went way too far, after all, to get him out of office. Much as some of the speak about Bush that we have heard lately.

Yes. I was thinking of the same thing. Maybe a lame duck won't be a popular target.

Sicko's full of hatred abound.