FOR ALL PEOPLE WHO STILL SUPPORT THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION!

The facts and allegations contained in this article are not disputed, are easily verified and are documented by the subjects in their own words. I am writing this not to tell you about some secret on to which I have stumbled, rather to explain the well defined and verifiable information that has been kept out of the public discourse by the American corporate news media. Perhaps this will serve as a prime example of how much media deception takes place in our nation. I ask you not to accept what you read in this article as truth, and I ask you not to dismiss it as an untruth, I ask you to research the claims for yourself. The information is out there and nobody is denying the claims made in this article. They are simply refusing to discuss them.

Please, don’t trust me…test me. – Jesse – Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

Snip:

At this very minute, the people who are in charge of the government of the United States of America believe that no rules apply to them. They believe that religion can be used to control society and that human rights do not apply to them. They do not have to follow the laws that all other citizens must respect, and they openly believe that evil is acceptable if deemed necessary to achieve their goals.

Read the entire article here:
http://tvnewslies.org/html/the_truth_about...ge_w__bush.html

Print it out and make sure every single Bush supporter reads this. Maybe they will realize how they are being duped! pdf download linked to article.....

This stuff is hilarious! Do you wear a tin-foil hat?

I'm a Bush supporter. I wasted my time reading a little of it. Still a Bush supporter, and agree with Stealth. Way to go!

If you plug yourself into the nearest wall socket, you will attain far more illuminence than possible with this link.

Praise Allah and Michael Moore.

uh....just exactly what part of the article is not FACTUAL? Did you bother to check out any of it? Do you know who and what PNAC is? Have you been to their website to see what they have posted to corroborate what is in this article?

Or, as a Bushite, do you just blindly believe that everything published to expose the real power brokers is all a bunch of lies?

Wake up..... and check it out for yourself.

Here's the PNAC page......Read Rebuilding America's Defenses and see the plans for attacking Iraq.

Read it and see that these folks who are all in the WH wrote of needing a 'new Pearl Harbor' before sheeple like you would agree to a war.

And you did....

http://newamericancentury.ort

Check out the signatures on their Mission Statement.
Don't just sit there and post silly comments.
This is serious stuff.....

With a plastic propeller whirling around on it?

Well then why don't YOU try to explain it to us instead of posting some dumb @ss link?

Sheeple? Where have I heard that used before?

Pour andir another glass of koolaid.

andir

You’re making one major mistake here, that is your assumption that Bush supporters are smart enough to tell facts from B.S. It’s a paradox. If they were they wouldn’t be Bush supporters.

There’s no point in trying to reason with them. Give these folks your sympathy, they need it. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

Spoken by one who really knows!

How are you TQ? We missed your insipid opinionated vitriolic trolling. welcome back!
JohnL and I are rooting for your reinstatement.

I would concur, it's stoney ground indeed around here

Whatamatta honkytonky? Can't you the flowers growing around here?

The Bush administration are not neocons. They are classical realists. It's a big difference. Neocons want to spread democracy and liberty across the globe in a big wave of joy. Realists want to create or maintain a balance of power favorable to their own nation, in this case the United States.

Other silly assertions made by the article include:

-The speculation that NeoCons cooked up the title to fool conservatives. Neocon was originally a pejoritive term they were labelled with by others.

-The idea that Leo Strauss advocated a dog eat dog world. That is nothing like the philosophy he advocated.



No we haven't. There are a few second tier policy makers who are neocons in the Bush administration, nobody else. If the Bush administration was based on neoconservative principles and a neoconservative agenda, it would behave much differently than it has.



Which neoconservative philosopher said anything to that effect at any time?



It would help if the author was aware of what the underlying philosophy of the neocons was. If he was, it would be quite obvious to him that the Bush Administration is not neoconservative in nature.



Which nefarious neocon goal contradicts with being an American? Advocating the spread of democracy? Supporting putting more cops on the beat as opposed to in patrol cars? Being a fan of charter schools?

The author is a silly man, and does not appear to understand either the motivations of the Bush administration or what a neoconservative is.

LOL, again thank you for the laugh, no, I did not read the whole thing. I would have lost my mind if I had tried. I might even find myself thinking like you, It is amusing that you consider this stuff worthy of attention. Yes, I am familiar with PNAC and no, I won't be getting my panties in a wad because of the opinion put forth.

This author, you are advocating and this position you are blindly, believing in, are guilty of what, he/you accused Bush of. This stuff is garbage, written for Chicken Littles and conspiracy lovers. The fact you don't realize that is hilarious, but ultimately, very sad. Lay off the Kool-Aid.

Hmmmm?







The antipaty of that is:

"Ms." Clinton, here are your supporters!





Media whoring for dummies!!

Hmm?
A paradox contradicts itself; as in, "`He always lies" as it is only a paradox because if it is true it must be false."




Obviously an efficacious situation self realized in and or of some degree of first hand experience and knowledge no doubt!!