John Kerry Wants Taxpayers to Fund Research That Destroys Lives
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
June 13, 2004
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Continuing to violate the pro-life legacy of Ronald Reagan that millions celebrated last week, likely Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry cited the death of the former president in challenging President Bush to lift restrictions on taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.
Saying that it could lead to cures for patients suffering from Alzheimer's as Reagan did, Kerry said researchers can only find a cure "if only they are allowed to look."
Ethical questions regarding the research, which destroys the lives of unborn children to obtain their stem cells, can be resolved with "good will and good sense," Kerry said in a radio address.
Kerry said Nancy Reagan "told the world that Alzheimer's had taken her own husband to a distant place, and then she stood up to help find a breakthrough that someday will spare other husbands, wives, children and parents from the same kind of heartache."
However, two leading researchers on Friday, including a Johns Hopkins University scientist...
http://66.195.16.55/nat575.html
Full Version: Kerry Wants To Destroy Life
QUOTE (Boon Mee @ Jun 15 2004, 03:47 AM)
John Kerry Wants Taxpayers to Fund Research That Destroys Lives
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
June 13, 2004
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Continuing to violate the pro-life legacy of Ronald Reagan that millions celebrated last week, likely Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry cited the death of the former president in challenging President Bush to lift restrictions on taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.
Saying that it could lead to cures for patients suffering from Alzheimer's as Reagan did, Kerry said researchers can only find a cure "if only they are allowed to look."
Ethical questions regarding the research, which destroys the lives of unborn children to obtain their stem cells, can be resolved with "good will and good sense," Kerry said in a radio address.
Kerry said Nancy Reagan "told the world that Alzheimer's had taken her own husband to a distant place, and then she stood up to help find a breakthrough that someday will spare other husbands, wives, children and parents from the same kind of heartache."
However, two leading researchers on Friday, including a Johns Hopkins University scientist...
http://66.195.16.55/nat575.html
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
June 13, 2004
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Continuing to violate the pro-life legacy of Ronald Reagan that millions celebrated last week, likely Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry cited the death of the former president in challenging President Bush to lift restrictions on taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.
Saying that it could lead to cures for patients suffering from Alzheimer's as Reagan did, Kerry said researchers can only find a cure "if only they are allowed to look."
Ethical questions regarding the research, which destroys the lives of unborn children to obtain their stem cells, can be resolved with "good will and good sense," Kerry said in a radio address.
Kerry said Nancy Reagan "told the world that Alzheimer's had taken her own husband to a distant place, and then she stood up to help find a breakthrough that someday will spare other husbands, wives, children and parents from the same kind of heartache."
However, two leading researchers on Friday, including a Johns Hopkins University scientist...
http://66.195.16.55/nat575.html
LOL - more right wing BS
More like Bush is willing to in effect KILL MILLIONS OF AMERICANS with all kinds of diseases, by suppressing cures, to PANDER to his fanatic radical right wing Christian fundamentalist base, just so he can get reelected and consolidate his dangerous power.
Who could expect less from our war criminal president?
Who could expect less from our war criminal president?
Ummmm..hate to say this,but stem cell growth and research is no more murder than what happens at a fertility clinic..and I do not see those being picketed. We are only talking about 3-5 day old tissues,and hundreds can be grown for a an in vitro to choose just a few potentially viable embryo's. It is a standard practice to grow them in groups for in vitro. The remainder not used are frozen or destroyed...so what is the difference? None at a clinical level, except one procedure is stamped controversial so it can be dismissed out of hand....the other given the stamp of aproval, and all because most people do not want to take the time to learn.
QUOTE (thesmith @ Jun 15 2004, 06:23 AM)
QUOTE (Boon Mee @ Jun 15 2004, 03:47 AM)
John Kerry Wants Taxpayers to Fund Research That Destroys Lives
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
June 13, 2004
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Continuing to violate the pro-life legacy of Ronald Reagan that millions celebrated last week, likely Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry cited the death of the former president in challenging President Bush to lift restrictions on taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.
Saying that it could lead to cures for patients suffering from Alzheimer's as Reagan did, Kerry said researchers can only find a cure "if only they are allowed to look."
Ethical questions regarding the research, which destroys the lives of unborn children to obtain their stem cells, can be resolved with "good will and good sense," Kerry said in a radio address.
Kerry said Nancy Reagan "told the world that Alzheimer's had taken her own husband to a distant place, and then she stood up to help find a breakthrough that someday will spare other husbands, wives, children and parents from the same kind of heartache."
However, two leading researchers on Friday, including a Johns Hopkins University scientist...
http://66.195.16.55/nat575.html
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
June 13, 2004
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Continuing to violate the pro-life legacy of Ronald Reagan that millions celebrated last week, likely Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry cited the death of the former president in challenging President Bush to lift restrictions on taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell research.
Saying that it could lead to cures for patients suffering from Alzheimer's as Reagan did, Kerry said researchers can only find a cure "if only they are allowed to look."
Ethical questions regarding the research, which destroys the lives of unborn children to obtain their stem cells, can be resolved with "good will and good sense," Kerry said in a radio address.
Kerry said Nancy Reagan "told the world that Alzheimer's had taken her own husband to a distant place, and then she stood up to help find a breakthrough that someday will spare other husbands, wives, children and parents from the same kind of heartache."
However, two leading researchers on Friday, including a Johns Hopkins University scientist...
http://66.195.16.55/nat575.html
LOL - more right wing BS
Guess what smithy, you're entire essence is B.S.
QUOTE (Thaiquila @ Jun 15 2004, 06:29 AM)
More like Bush is willing to in effect KILL MILLIONS OF AMERICANS with all kinds of diseases, by suppressing cures, to PANDER to his fanatic radical right wing Christian fundamentalist base, just so he can get reelected and consolidate his dangerous power.
Who could expect less from our war criminal president?
Who could expect less from our war criminal president?
*Yawns*
"I hate Bush!"
"Christianity is evil!"
"No wait..... all religion is evil!"
"Oh God my civil rights!"
"Agggggggghhhhhhhh!"
THIS IS WHAT YOU AND SMITHY SOUND LIKE ALL THE TIME.
Sen. John Kerry and his ketchup heiress wife, Teresa Heinz, paid a meager 15.2 percent of their gross income to the IRS last year, new data released Tuesday by the Kerry campaign shows.
So what is the point about Kerry paying 15 percent taxes?
Obviously, he is not a tax cheat or he wouldn't be running for president.
Also obviously, he is a very high income earner.
The conclusion I make, and I am sure he would make, along with WARREN BUFFET and BILL GATES, is that high income earners in America are paying WAY TOO LITTLE LEGALLY due to the low tax rate welfare for the rich only policies of Bush.
Obviously, he is not a tax cheat or he wouldn't be running for president.
Also obviously, he is a very high income earner.
The conclusion I make, and I am sure he would make, along with WARREN BUFFET and BILL GATES, is that high income earners in America are paying WAY TOO LITTLE LEGALLY due to the low tax rate welfare for the rich only policies of Bush.
QUOTE (Thaiquila @ Jun 15 2004, 10:43 PM)
So what is the point about Kerry paying 15 percent taxes?
Obviously, he is not a tax cheat or he wouldn't be running for president.
Also obviously, he is a very high income earner.
The conclusion I make, and I am sure he would make, along with WARREN BUFFET and BILL GATES, is that high income earners in America are paying WAY TOO LITTLE LEGALLY due to the low tax rate welfare for the rich only policies of Bush.
Obviously, he is not a tax cheat or he wouldn't be running for president.
Also obviously, he is a very high income earner.
The conclusion I make, and I am sure he would make, along with WARREN BUFFET and BILL GATES, is that high income earners in America are paying WAY TOO LITTLE LEGALLY due to the low tax rate welfare for the rich only policies of Bush.
The point is, here's a guy who pays a significantly low rate on high income and wants to take what little GWB has given us middle-class earners, away? But, it goes beyond that...he's a tax & spend liberal and as the general population learn more about who he isn't, adios!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.