Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Pentagon Classifies Homosexuality as a Mental Disorder
Political Topics And Discussion > All Things Political > US Political Topics
Pages: 1, 2
Gore_Lost
Hopefully this will lead to those afflicted in receiving benefits and the help they need. Kudos to the pentagon for taking the lead. Mental Health has always been an issue that has been ignored in Western Civilization, with it's stigmas and at times even violent reactions to it- see Frances Farmer.

ARTICLE LINK:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200200,00.html

ARTICLE EXERPT:
QUOTE
Pentagon Document Classifies Homosexuality as Mental Disorder
Tuesday, June 20, 2006

WASHINGTON — A Pentagon document classifies homosexuality as a mental disorder, decades after mental health experts abandoned that position.

The document outlines retirement or other discharge policies for service members with physical disabilities, and in a section on defects lists homosexuality alongside mental retardation and personality disorders.

Critics said the reference underscores the Pentagon's failing policies on gays, and adds to a culture that has created uncertainty and insecurity around the treatment of homosexual service members, leading to anti-gay harassment.

Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Jeremy M. Martin said the
...
{cont}
Haupt
...thank you for proving just how retarded the Pentagon, and this whole administration in General...really is....
Fit2BThaied
As you would expect, FoxNews and Gore (Lost Gore) have misrepresented parts of the article by the opening lines. The article continues,

"The Pentagon has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy that prohibits the military from inquiring about the sex lives of service members but requires discharges of those who openly acknowledge being gay.

The Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military, at the University of California at Santa Barbara, uncovered the document and pointed to it as further proof that the military deserves failing grades for its treatment of gays.

Nathaniel Frank, senior research fellow at the center, said, "The policy reflects the department's continued misunderstanding of homosexuality and makes it more difficult for gays and lesbians to access mental health services."

The document, called a Defense Department Instruction, was condemned by medical professionals, members of Congress and other experts, including the American Psychiatric Association.

"It is disappointing that certain Department of Defense instructions include homosexuality as a 'mental disorder' more than 30 years after the mental health community recognized that such a classification was a mistake," said Rep. Marty Meehan, D-Mass.

Congress members noted that other Pentagon regulations dealing with mental health do not include homosexuality on any lists of psychological disorders. And in a letter to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on Monday, nine lawmakers asked for a full review of all documents and policies to ensure they reflect that same standard.

"Based on scientific and medical evidence the APA declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder in 1973 — a position shared by all other major health and mental health organizations based on their own review of the science," James H. Scully Jr., head of the psychiatric association, said in a letter to the Defense Department's top doctor earlier this month.

There were 726 military members discharged under the "don't ask, don't tell" policy during the budget year that ended last Sept. 30. That marked the first year since 2001 that the total had increased. The number of discharges had declined each year since it peaked at 1,227 in 2001, and had fallen to 653 in 2004."

It's apparently only an internal Pentagon document, not yet promulgated and subject to countless reviews and public pressures and Congressional oversight. However, it unmasks the military's unnecessary homophobia as a sham, especially when it presents homosexuality a possible (false) "mental disorder."

I had a mental disorder while I served in the USAF, which was the mistaken belief that homosexuality was wrong. Six babies later, I realized the Air Force was wrong. smile.gif
Nomad
QUOTE
I had a mental disorder while I served in the USAF, which was the mistaken belief that homosexuality was wrong. Six babies later, I realized the Air Force was wrong.


You sired 6 children and then decided to become gay????????? You got major issues here Fit..

035.gif 035.gif 035.gif
Haupt
you can't DECIDE to become gay....did you DECIDE to be a poor stupid hick?No, probably not but you are anyways....
Nomad
I wasn't talking to you squirt. Now run along child.
Mobster989
Are these the same people who think that ADD and ADHD are actual disorders? I have no faith in any group that claims rowdy kids is due to a freakin' mental disorder.

I really don't care what they classify homosexuality as so long as the gays keep their business to themselves. That goes for straight people too. I really don't want to hear about your personal life. I don't care about you at work, what the hell makes you think I care about what you do on your off time?
Thaiquila
QUOTE (Mobster989 @ Jun 21 2006, 08:08 AM) *
Are these the same people who think that ADD and ADHD are actual disorders? I have no faith in any group that claims rowdy kids is due to a freakin' mental disorder.

I really don't care what they classify homosexuality as so long as the gays keep their business to themselves. That goes for straight people too. I really don't want to hear about your personal life. I don't care about you at work, what the hell makes you think I care about what you do on your off time?

You just don't get it, do you?
Hets FLAUNT it ALL THE TIME in public, endless talk about dates, wives, kids, family pictures, how hot that girl is, and on and on. How did you ever get to be so clueless?
Mobster989
I didn't say they don't do it. I just said I don't want to hear it. I try to avoid those discussions.
Fit2BThaied
QUOTE (Nomad @ Jun 21 2006, 10:40 AM) *
You sired 6 children and then decided to become gay????????? You got major issues here Fit..
Haupt is right: I didn't decide to become gay, and that's not what my post said. After the homophobic world, reinforced by the USAF, convinced me not to begin acting as gay, I waited 20 years and had 6 kids. Then I decided I had been bamboozled into the mental illness of thinking it was a sin to be gay, and I finally straightened myself out and starting acting my natural self.

Haupt is a kid, but he understands it better. Now, Nomad, who acts half Haupt's age, why don't you run off and play with yourself, while we real men (straight or gay or bi or undecided or undeclared) have a mature man's discussion? 'Bye.
Haupt
QUOTE (Nomad @ Jun 20 2006, 11:16 PM) *
I wasn't talking to you squirt. Now run along child.

stop it..... mad.gif
ustrader
QUOTE
Haupt is right: I didn't decide to become gay, and that's not what my post said. After the homophobic world, reinforced by the USAF, convinced me not to begin acting as gay, I waited 20 years and had 6 kids. Then I decided I had been bamboozled into the mental illness of thinking it was a sin to be gay, and I finally straightened myself out and starting acting my natural self.


I knew there was something oddly illusory and deceptive about you FITs.

Not that I give a rat if your gay or not. Yet, I find your continuing deceit self evident in this self-created illusion of blaming, in idyllic portrayal, that the AIR FORCE or others made you somehow be deceitful and dishonest. It is a comment so full of self-deceit and reprehensive unawareness that is deceitfully infidel and completely full of rubbish of the highest mendacious order.

Yet, I ponder what kind of character a man has who could be that deceptive for that many years. I know my view of you has change dramatically. Not in any manner related to your gayness at all, for that is nothing.

Instead in your effrontery of willingness to lay the blame of your pretending NOT to be gay at the foot of someone else. In that self deceit, I see a true disorder far beyond the pale that ignores the truth about the one who created the entire situation to begin with and lays the blame for the dishonesty and deceit at the foot of the Air Force, others and likely sadly your family.

A modus Operandi you frequently use here to deflect your true character and intent that is now clearly explainable.

Even the Child Haupt knows one does not decide to be gay. One who is gay as TQ has said so often, has always been gay. The Air Force did not make you pretend to be NOT gay, you made your self pretend to be NOT gay in you own deceit and in the deceptions that surely came to your family once the evil Air Force let you be gay as you obviously always knew you were.

025.gif TQ has advised us that being gay is not a choice but it is a natural occurrences in one's psychological make up. I ponder what that deception all those years conveys about your character as an honest person of truthful conviction and self awareness.

Oddly, I find it interesting that you, like TQ, "found yourself" in Thailand, an inexpensive target rich environment especially for a teacher.

I though I deciphered you making a comment, oddly to 15 year old boy here not long ago about having a "boy friend 45 years younger than yourself. Yet, I ignored it. Now I ponder your motive?

I do not begrudge your finding your Christian gayness after 20 years of deceit, I do begrudge your blaming it on anyone but yourself which is a true character flaw when one can not own up to their own faults, failures and deceits but instead lays them at the feet others like the Air force,others and sadly their family no doubt.

Bellatoris Mores
Munus semper primus perficiam
Numquam cladem accipiam
Numquam signa deseram
Numquam mortuum commilitonem relinquam

TUM DII DAI DII, TUM CHUA DAI CHUA!



THAT IS ALL!!
Nomad
Well said Trader, as usual. Don't let the aholes discourage your style of venacular verbosity. Those that criticize are either too lazy or too ignorant to understand your style. Hell, you are an easier read than that idiot called Shakespere.

Your assessment of FIT is quite accurate. But there is much more here....... One cannot sire 6 childern and be gay. Unless a turkey baster was involved. And why would anyone, straight or gay, have six childern unless these childern were to be the centerpiece of their lives???? Yet Fit seems to take delight, on more then one post, to tell us his adolescent childern are drug addicts and alcoholics. Fit is a small very insecure little man that has turned to Jesus in the hope of atoning for past transgressions. Yet Fit can not realize that Jesus will not help his addicted offspring. Only Fit can help here yet this will not happen because of a basic flaw in his being that will not allow him to see that he is responsible for everything that has happened or will happen in his pathetic life. He will always find another to blame.
Haupt
QUOTE (Nomad @ Jun 23 2006, 12:41 AM) *
Well said Trader, as usual. Don't let the aholes discourage your style of venacular verbosity. Those that criticize are either too lazy or too ignorant to understand your style. Hell, you are an easier read than that idiot called Shakespere.

Your assessment of FIT is quite accurate. But there is much more here....... One cannot sire 6 childern and be gay. Unless a turkey baster was involved. And why would anyone, straight or gay, have six childern unless these childern were to be the centerpiece of their lives???? Yet Fit seems to take delight, on more then one post, to tell us his adolescent childern are drug addicts and alcoholics. Fit is a small very insecure little man that has turned to Jesus in the hope of atoning for past transgressions. Yet Fit can not realize that Jesus will not help his addicted offspring. Only Fit can help here yet this will not happen because of a basic flaw in his being that will not allow him to see that he is responsible for everything that has happened or will happen in his pathetic life. He will always find another to blame.

being gay isn't a flaw...being stupid and ignorant is a flaw....no, unlike nomad, I'd say FIT is relatively clear of all flaws as I can see....
Fit2BThaied
QUOTE (Nomad @ Jun 23 2006, 12:41 PM) *
Well said Trader, as usual. Don't let the aholes discourage your style of venacular verbosity. Those that criticize are either too lazy or too ignorant to understand your style. Hell, you are an easier read than that idiot called Shakespere.

Your assessment of FIT is quite accurate. But there is much more here....... One cannot sire 6 childern and be gay. Unless a turkey baster was involved. And why would anyone, straight or gay, have six childern unless these childern were to be the centerpiece of their lives???? Yet Fit seems to take delight, on more then one post, to tell us his adolescent childern are drug addicts and alcoholics. Fit is a small very insecure little man that has turned to Jesus in the hope of atoning for past transgressions. Yet Fit can not realize that Jesus will not help his addicted offspring. Only Fit can help here yet this will not happen because of a basic flaw in his being that will not allow him to see that he is responsible for everything that has happened or will happen in his pathetic life. He will always find another to blame.
Your brilliance and knowledge of reproductive anatomy and physiology amazes me, Nomad. Is your other Ph.D. in psychonalysis?

I am gay, and I have six children. In case you're not familiar with how to impregnate a woman without a turkey baster (funny joke, 11 points for that one smile.gif ), you insert a penis, preferably a long, fat one. Actually, counting the nonabortive miscarriages, I made her pregnant 9 times out of about 4,000 or 5,000 penetrations. Not a bad record, considering we used lots of birth control.

I was born gay, raised to be straight, and for decades, I was straight on my turkey baster (when it was straight, which is still frequently biggrin.gif ). Then I realized my wife didn't have one of those baster things, and I went off in search of one. biggrin.gif

I love my children, and if I cared about your opinion, I'd take a fence at your remarks. I loved my children enough to take them away from their incompetent mother (with permission of her and the worthless stepfather), and raise them by myself. Perhaps you don't know any alcoholics; it's an addiction. And marijuana is one sneaky addiction.

I turned to Jesus when I was straight, and wasn't guilty of that many sins (in fact, I was a virgin, if that's relevant to your analysis). Jesus has helped me all these years. If you haven't tried to let Jesus come into your heart, I seriously recommend that you do so.

Jesus will help my children; that's how my older twin got off her addiction, by finding religion.

When did I ever deny responsibility for my own actions? Have you denied yours? Who am I blaming? Do you know what psychological projection is?

My life is surely not pathetic. I have a lover, three pensions, an honorable military discharge, a career award from the Treasury Dept., and I've been quite successful and responsible as a schoolteacher in a traditional culture here. I live in a tropical paradise on a beach, although we're moving.

I think you're jealous. Let me guess: you post on this from the public library, for free, after you finish work at McDonald's, and you're 16 years old, and your mother still cleans your room for you. laugh.gif
Fit2BThaied
QUOTE (Nomad @ Jun 23 2006, 12:41 PM) *
Well said Trader, as usual. Don't let the aholes discourage your style of venacular verbosity. Those that criticize are either too lazy or too ignorant to understand your style. Hell, you are an easier read than that idiot called Shakespere.

Your assessment of FIT is quite accurate. But there is much more here....... One cannot sire 6 childern and be gay. Unless a turkey baster was involved. And why would anyone, straight or gay, have six childern unless these childern were to be the centerpiece of their lives???? Yet Fit seems to take delight, on more then one post, to tell us his adolescent childern are drug addicts and alcoholics. Fit is a small very insecure little man that has turned to Jesus in the hope of atoning for past transgressions. Yet Fit can not realize that Jesus will not help his addicted offspring. Only Fit can help here yet this will not happen because of a basic flaw in his being that will not allow him to see that he is responsible for everything that has happened or will happen in his pathetic life. He will always find another to blame.
Your brilliance and knowledge of reproductive anatomy and physiology amazes me, Nomad. Is your other Ph.D. in psychonalysis?

I am gay, and I have six children. In case you're not familiar with how to impregnate a woman without a turkey baster (funny joke, 11 points for that one smile.gif ), you insert a penis, preferably a long, fat one. Actually, counting the nonabortive miscarriages, I made her pregnant 9 times out of about 4,000 or 5,000 penetrations. Not a bad record, considering we used lots of birth control.

I was born gay, raised to be straight, and for decades, I was straight on my turkey baster (when it was straight, which is still frequently biggrin.gif ). Then I realized my wife didn't have one of those baster things, and I went off in search of one. biggrin.gif

I love my children, and if I cared about your opinion, I'd take a fence at your remarks. I loved my children enough to take them away from their incompetent mother (with permission of her and the worthless stepfather), and raise them by myself. Perhaps you don't know any alcoholics; it's an addiction. And marijuana is one sneaky addiction.

I turned to Jesus when I was straight, and wasn't guilty of that many sins (in fact, I was a virgin, if that's relevant to your analysis). Jesus has helped me all these years. If you haven't tried to let Jesus come into your heart, I seriously recommend that you do so.

Jesus will help my children; that's how my older twin got off her addiction, by finding religion.

When did I ever deny responsibility for my own actions? Have you denied yours? Who am I blaming? Do you know what psychological projection is?

My life is surely not pathetic. I have a lover, three pensions, an honorable military discharge, a career award from the Treasury Dept., and I've been quite successful and responsible as a schoolteacher in a traditional culture here. I live in a tropical paradise on a beach, although we're moving.

I think you're jealous. Let me guess: you post on this from the public library, for free, after you finish work at McDonald's, and you're 16 years old, and your mother still cleans your room for you. laugh.gif
John L
QUOTE (Nomad @ Jun 20 2006, 11:40 PM) *
You sired 6 children and then decided to become gay????????? You got major issues here Fit..

035.gif 035.gif 035.gif


Fit' is what would be correctly categorized as a "bisexual". Not all bisexuals are equally attracted to both sexes either. Some are more inclined to homosexual, others to hetrosexual. There is no defining slot. A true, 100% homosexual, such as TQ, would Never be interested in a woman.

It's all in the genes. And not the ones you wear. wink.gif

QUOTE ("TQ")
You just don't get it, do you?
Hets FLAUNT it ALL THE TIME in public, endless talk about dates, wives, kids, family pictures, how hot that girl is, and on and on. How did you ever get to be so clueless?


The reason why you don't like this is because, being such a small minority, you demand that others conform to your idea of the universe. Unfortunately for you TQ, you are in a minority that is not of your choosing. Yet, expecting the rest of the "normal" humans to act anything BUT normal, is demanding just too much. It is unfortunate, but true. My advice: get used to it. That is life. Life is not going to bow down to your outrage for being less than normal.

And as for the Air Force's decision, that is unfortunate, because it is obviously NOT a mental health issue, other than the fact that homosexuals have the highest percentage of clinical depression, suicide, early death, yada, yada, yada. It is GENETIC! It can't be helped. But what can be helped is stupitidy.
John L
QUOTE (ustrader @ Jun 22 2006, 08:18 PM) *
I knew there was something oddly illusory and deceptive about you FITs.

Yet, I ponder what kind of character a man has who could be that deceptive for that many years. I know my view of you has change dramatically. Not in any manner related to your gayness at all, for that is nothing.

Instead in your effrontery of willingness to lay the blame of your pretending NOT to be gay at the foot of someone else. In that self deceit, I see a true disorder far beyond the pale that ignores the truth about the one who created the entire situation to begin with and lays the blame for the dishonesty and deceit at the foot of the Air Force, others and likely sadly your family.


Oh come on, trader. that is totally disingenuous of you here. First, Fit' is doing what All of us do, in order to protect ourselves. We implicitly OR explicitly deceive others, and sometimes outselves. I have been known to do it, and so do you. So, why are you blaming someone for what you also do?

And as for illusionary and deceptiveness about Fit's propencity, if you accept the "bisexual" concept, then it is not a huge leap to see where one would attempt to be Normal, and cleary with regard to sex hetrosexuality is Normal, while homosexuality is not. I have known of many people who have attempted to maintain normalicy, and perhaps more are able than not. But Fit is, and was, probably caught in the middle of things. But to paint him as being of terrible character for not totally conforming to the norm is a bit too much, in my opinion.


QUOTE (Nomad @ Jun 23 2006, 01:41 AM) *
Well said Trader, as usual. Don't let the aholes discourage your style of venacular verbosity. Those that criticize are either too lazy or too ignorant to understand your style. Hell, you are an easier read than that idiot called Shakespere.

Your assessment of FIT is quite accurate. But there is much more here....... One cannot sire 6 childern and be gay. Unless a turkey baster was involved. And why would anyone, straight or gay, have six childern unless these childern were to be the centerpiece of their lives???? Yet Fit seems to take delight, on more then one post, to tell us his adolescent childern are drug addicts and alcoholics. Fit is a small very insecure little man that has turned to Jesus in the hope of atoning for past transgressions. Yet Fit can not realize that Jesus will not help his addicted offspring. Only Fit can help here yet this will not happen because of a basic flaw in his being that will not allow him to see that he is responsible for everything that has happened or will happen in his pathetic life. He will always find another to blame.


Nomad, spoken again like a good little biggot. I will state this again: Fit' is a Bisexual. I realize that this very concept is difficult to wrap one's finger around, but that is how some things happen. And get used to this. There are far more bisexuals out there than straight homosexuals, such as TQ. Give it a rest, ok?

What is it with you people?
Thaiquila
I ain't no straight homosexual!
Gore_Lost
JohnL is gay or bisexual. It is now confirmed. This explains your peculiar kinship and protectionism for fit. If it so why not admit it?
John L
QUOTE (Gore_Lost @ Jun 23 2006, 08:00 PM) *
JohnL is gay or bisexual. It is now confirmed. This explains your peculiar kinship and protectionism for fit. If it so why not admit it?


Give Me A Break! I simply defend the defendable. I am absolutely convinced that the homosexuality trait is genetic, and not something that someone just desides to do one fine day.

Further, I fully understand where your alien logic origionates, if you believe that defending someone confirms an illogical assumption, even as outrageous as this one. I can also condone gastronomical flatulence, as it is only a function of the body. But intellectual flatulence? I have no cure for your problem there. tongue.gif blink.gif
Gore_Lost
Prove genetics of homosexuality then. Isn't that your ire with the leftists? No facts. There is no proof that it is genetic.
More so, I am focusing on your peculiar desire to defend.

Why defend? Is it that you believe he is incapable of defending himself? Is this also genetic? What I find rather disturbing is your "trigger" at the mention of child molestation, you instantly come to the defense of the accused...This disturbes me. Fit mention a 15 year old boy as a boyfriend. What is your vested interest in that?

You are using the liberal dance in your argument and that is what is perplexing. If you notice US Trader called Fit on exactly what I told you of my suspicions via PM. Think I'm alone here JOHNL?

Quick facts. Study of homosexual twins have established over and over that there is no evidence of genetic design. Homosexuality is an inheritable trait? How does that work...?!?!

The Science against homosexuality being genetic:
1.)Dr. Dean Hamer who failed to find a "gay gene":

"Homosexuality is not purely genetic. Environmental factors play a role. There is not a single master gene that makes people gay. I don't think that we will ever be able to predict who will be gay."

2.) Dr. Dean Hamer was asked by Scientific American if homosexuality was rooted solely in biology. He replied:

"Absolutely not. From twin studies we already know that half or more of the variability in sexual orientation is not inherited. Our studies try to pinpoint the genetic factors, not negate the psychosocial factors."

("New Evidence of a "Gay Gene," by Anastasia Toufexis, Time, November 13, 1995, Vol. 146. Issue 20, p.95)

3.) British researchers generated comparable results in an identical-twin study. Their conclusion? The suprisingly low odds that both twins were homosexual.

The study by them: "confirmed that genetic factors are insufficient explanation for the development of sexual orientation."

(King, M and McDonald, E. Homosexuals Who Are Twins: A Study of 46 Probands. British Journal of Psychiatry. 160: 407-409 (1992).

4a.)Homosexual researcher Simon Levay, who studied the hypothalamic differences between the brains of heterosexuals and homosexuals:

"I didn't show that gay men are born that way the msot common mistake people make in interpreting my work. Nor did I locate a gay center in the brain."

4b.)Dr. Simon Levay: The most widely held opinion [on causation of homosexuality] is that multiple factors play a role.

Levay, Simon (1996). Queer Science, MIT Press.

5.) Dr. J. Satinover:

"Research studies on homosexuality by Dr's Dean Hamer, Michael Bailey, Richard Dillard, Simon Levay. Laura Allen and Roger Gorski have failed to show proof of a gay gene. There is no scientific evidence that shows that homosexuality is genetic. The media has sensationalized and perpetuated the myth of a homosexual gene."

Satinover, J. M.D. (1996) Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth. Grand Rapids. Baker Books

6.) Another of Dr. Jeffery Satinover's conclusions in "The Gay Gene":

"There is no evidence that shows that homosexuality is genetic--and none of the resaerch itself claims there is. Only the press and certain researchers do when speaking in sound bites to the public."

(Jeffery Satinover, M.D. The Journal of Human Sexuality, 1996, p.8)

7.) The American Psychological Association:

"Many scientists share the view that sexual orientation is shaped for many people at an early age through complex interactions of biology, psychological and social factors."

(The American Psychological Association's pamphlet "Answers to Your Questions About Sexual Orientation and Homosexuality."

8.) The American Psychiatric Association (2000):

"no replicated scientific studies showing any specific biological etiology for homosexuality."

9.) Sociologist Steven Goldberg:

"I know of no one in the field who argues that homosexuality can be explained without reference to environmental factors."

(Goldberg, Steven (1994) When Wish Replaces Thought: Why So Much of What You Believe is False. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books.

10a.) Science, 1994:

"Time and time again, scientists have claimed that particular genes or chromosomal regions are associated with behavioral traits only to withdraw their findings when they were not replicated. "Unfortunately," says Yale's [Dr. Joel] Gelernter: "It's hard to come up with many findings linking specific genes to complex human behaviors that have been replicated...all were announced with great fanfare, all were greeted unskeptically in the popular press; all are now in disrepute."

(Mann, C. "Genes and Behavior." Science 264: 1687 (1994), pp. 1686-1689.)

10b.) "The interactions of genes and environment is much more complex than the simple "violence genes" and "intelligence genes" touted in the popular press."

Mann, C. op. cit. pp. 1686-1689

11.) Two genetics researchers, one at Harvard, commented in Technology Review, July 1993 p. 60 concerning twin study's.

"While the authors interpreted their findings as evidence for a genetic basis for homosexuality, we think that the data, in fact, provide strong evidence for the influence of the environment."

(Billings, P. and Beckwith, J. Technology Review, July 1993. p.60)

12.) P. Scott Richards:

"Some environmental and psychological factors that may play a causal role in the development of homosexuality include: (1) cross-gender effiminate behavior in childhood. (2) gender-identity deficits (3) hostile, dteached or absent fathers (which leads to "defensive detachment" from the father and other males) and (4) overly close, controlling or dominating mothers.

(P. Scott Richards, "The Treatment of Homosexuality: Some Historical, Contemporary and Personal Perspectives," AMCAP Journal. Vol 19, No. 1, 1993, pg. 36)

13.) Lesbian biologist Dr. Anne Fausto-Sterling of Brown University, responding to the "born that way" argument:

"It provides a legal argument that is, at the moment actually having some sawy in court. For me, it's a very shaky palce. It's bad science and bad politics. It seems to me that the way we consider homosexuality in our culture is an ethical and a moral one."

14.) Camille Paglia, lesbiam activist: "Homosexuality is 'not normal'. On the contrary it is a challenge to the norm. Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature, procreation is the single, relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction. No one is born gay. The idea is ridiculous. Homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait."

Camille Paglia: " Is the gay identity so fragile that it cannot bear the thought that some people may not wish to be gay? Sexuality is highly fluid, and reversals are theoretically possible. However, habit is highly refractory, and once the sensory pathways have been blazed -- a phenmenon obvious in the struggle with obesity, smoking, alcoholism or drug addiction...helping to learn how to function heterosexually, if they wish, is a perferctly worthy aim."

Camille Paglia: " We should be honest enough to consider whether homosexuality may not indeed be a pausing at the prepubscent stage where children anxiously band together bt gender...current gay cant insists that homosexuality is 'not a choice'; that no one would choose to be gay in a homophobic society. But there is an element of choice in all behavior, sexual or otherwise. It takes an effort to deal with the opposite sex; it is safer to deal with your own kind. The issue is one of challenge versus comfort."

Boys victimized by older men are far more likely to be homosexual as adults, and the cycle often repeats itself. More environmental factors.

15.) Noted child sex-abuse expert David Finkelhor found that "boys victimized by older men were over four times more likley to be currently engaged in homosexual activity than were non-victims. The finding applied to nearly half the boys who had such an experience. Further, the adolescents themselves often linked their homosexuality to their victimization experiences."

(Bill Watkins & Aaron Bentovim, "The Sexual Bause of Male Adolescents: A Review of Current Research, " Journal of Child Psychiatry 33, (1992); in Byren Finkelman, Sexual Abuse(New York: Garland Publishing, 1995), p. 316

16.) The Archives of Sexual Behavior:

"One of the most salient findings of this study is that 46% of homosexual men and 22% of homosexual women reported having been molested by a person of the same gender."

(Marie, E. Tomeo "Comparative Data of Childhood and Adolescent Molestation in Heterosexual and Homosexual Persons." Archives of Sexual Behavior 30 (2001): 539)

17.) A study of 279 homosexual and bisexual men with Aids and control patients reported:

"More than half of both case and control patients reported a sexual act with a male by age 16 years, approximately 20% by age 10 years."

(Harry W. Haverkos, "The Initiation of Male Homosexual Behavior," The Journal of the American Medical Association 262 (July 28, 1989): 501)

18.) A stduy of 229 convicted child molesters found that:

"86% of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual."

(W.D. Erickson, Behavior Patterns of Child Molesters, Archives of Sexual Behavior 17 (1988): 83)

19.) A National Institue of Justice report states that:

"the odds that a childhood sexual abuse victim will be arrested as an adult for any sex crime is 4.7 times higher than for people...who experienced no victimization as children."

(Cathy Spatz Widom, "Victims of Childhood Sexual Abuse - Later Criminal Consequences, Victims of Childhood Sexual Abuse Series: NIJ Research in Brief (March 1995): 6)

20.) A Child Abuse and Neglect study found that 59% of male child sex offenders had beenvictims of contact sexual abuse as a child.

(Michelle Elliott, "Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: What offenders Tell Us" Child Abuse and Neglect 19, (1995): 582)
Thaiquila
Gore Lost is a very sick man. He seems obsessed with digging up very dated "studies" that support his obsessive disgust of homosexuals. Reading that last post makes me want to take a shower (and I just took one). SICK!!!!!
ustrader
TQ, though I have no dog in this fight, I ponder if we are all in the same game here.

Not knowing the merits or lack thereof of the gentlemen’s points, he did, in fact, lay down a considerable body of work to make the point he intended rightly or wrongly. It would be cheaply superficial and intellectually dishonest for anyone who says it is unproven, dated, garbage, not to provide evidence of that measure of opined contention, don’t you think?

QUOTE
What really raises one's indignation against senselessness is not senselessness intrinsically, but the suffering in enduring senselessness.-Trader


All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. -Arthur Schopenhauer

Bellatoris Mores
Munus semper primus perficiam
Numquam cladem accipiam
Numquam signa deseram
Numquam mortuum commilitonem relinquam

TUM DII DAI DII, TUM CHUA DAI CHUA!



THAT IS ALL!!
ustrader
QUOTE
Oh come on, trader. that is totally disingenuous of you here. First, Fit' is doing what All of us do, in order to protect ourselves. We implicitly OR explicitly deceive others, and sometimes outselves. I have been known to do it, and so do you. So, why are you blaming someone for what you also do?

And as for illusionary and deceptiveness about Fit's propencity, if you accept the "bisexual" concept, then it is not a huge leap to see where one would attempt to be Normal, and cleary with regard to sex hetrosexuality is Normal, while homosexuality is not. I have known of many people who have attempted to maintain normalicy, and perhaps more are able than not. But Fit is, and was, probably caught in the middle of things. But to paint him as being of terrible character for not totally conforming to the norm is a bit too much, in my opinion.


John L, though I respect you usual balanced views. I think you have over simplified what I said and over looked completely the main point I made here.

As I said, it is not his reasons for or even his deception and or his bisexuality or homosexuality that is an effrontery, as I said, that is completely unimportant and his burden to bare. likewise, I never said he was a terrible person for being a closet gay as was normal, as you said, in a bygone era.

The point I made that is an effrontery is in his own words not just on this topic and thread but accumulatively in a pattern and practice clearly exampled in his own word usage.

As FITs said on this particular subject and has exhibited in staedfast propensity to about most anything discussed particular in his blame America for all the world's ills menatilty, that is, like his statements in this post #15, examples of projection bias.

His cummlative statements like those exampled in post number 15 are particularly enlightening as to my point about self responsibility and the related consequences of one actions or inactions as the case maybe.

Most particular revealing is what is not said about the faults of others as well as some very ponyent but informatively revealing choices of word usage.

Do you know what psychological projection is? Hmm?

QUOTE
The reality of the other person lies not in what he reveals to you, but what he cannot or Does not reveal to you. Therefore, if you would understand him, listen not to what he says, but rather to what he does not say.” Kahlil Gibran


Odd stories Fits. You proclaim achievement and satisfaction. Yet, at ever corner you confess projection bias, first in blaming society, the Air force and by implication others, for your dishonesty in disavowing your own nature though understand given the era it nevertheless breds a tendency for a propensity to grow rather than diminish once continued in longevity.

You then exclaim fault to an alcoholic drug addicted wife and two drug addicted children, as if it were all their fault and YOU, as the Stewart of the family, were but a mere bystander in that arena and the circumstances that surrounded it. Unsayingly accepting no culpibility or blame but clearly faulting others in doing so. To that I find to be an effrontery.

Lastly, comes this odd embracing of Christianity, which in overwhelming majorities of opinion does not embrace you and even rejects you. Wrongly or rightly, of that I am not well suited to judge. Yet, clearly it does reject you as a homosexual as does most religions especially the Islam that you chant as so repressed by you own country and people. That I find to be an effrontery.

All the while, proudly proclaiming, how you live off pensions from a government, people and a nation that you constantly deride, demean and ridicule, blaming them exclusively for the entire world’s ills.

Meantime giving all others, who are far more culpable to the world ills in these diatribes of blame, a pass, in this constant anti-America dementia and pattern of blaming all but the blameful?

Yet, noticeably leaving out, conveniently, your own culpability in all the personal failures of your family, yourself and especially those that are the real evil in this world. Now that as well I call an effrontery.

If that is not clearly classic Freudian projection bias there never was any.

Like in Christianity, it was and is your cross to bear and thusly needs no measure of explanation nor judgment by any here. For it is to be measured by what ever comes next if anything at all.

The Thai’s have a saying drawn from a mantra embedded in the principles of Buddhism. It goes something like this.

The first part, "tum dii dai dii", literally means, "do good, get good" The second part, "tum chua, dai chua", literally means, do bad, get bad.

The measure of either is of course, subjective, especially in our terrestrial unproven world of Religious judgments and supremacy. Yet, as you religious hypes, who are often running from something, rather than to something, presume, it is to be eventually measured by a higher power in the hereafter.

I find it oddly Freudian your using this most revealing term psychological projection which is more commonly known as (projection bias); the operation of expelling feelings or wishes the individual finds wholly unacceptable—too shameful, too obscene, too dangerous—by attributing them to another or in blame to others." (Freud: A Life for Our Time, page 281)

A learned man once said regarding this deceptive human flaw of projection bias;

He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby becomes a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."
— Beyond Good and Evil

Similarly, the philosopher Ludwig Feuerbach based his theory of religion in large part upon the idea of projection, i.e., the idea that an anthropomorphic deity is the outward projection of man's anxieties and desires.

Oddly, I pondered the real person, if there is one, behind these examples of some level of co-dependent evolutions of dissimilar but well clarified projection bias?

Projection is an especially commonly used defense mechanism in people with certain personality disorders:

· Paranoid personality disorder

(Implies the presence of ongoing, baseless suspiciousness and distrust of people or maybe Of a Country, its people and your government)

· Narcissistic personality disorder-

(Basic sense of inferiority, displaying excessive anger or shame when experiencing rejection, although this is often not noticed by others.

The individual presents a false self to the world. (A long history there)

Has grandiose sense of self-importance. arrogant affect, haughty behaviors or attitudes toward the surrounding world and to that which they object. Under feelings of inferiority, there is a preoccupation with fantasies and an aimless orientation toward superficial interests and obsessive supposition and blame.)

· Antisocial personality disorder

(Internalized morals of our unconscious mind are restricted from surfacing to the ego and consciousness and are thusly repressed and projected outward away from self.)

· Psychopathy

(Narcissistic obsessively focused view with little to no concern for the greater world that is perceived as non obeying with a complete disregard for any sense of social obligation beyond their narrow narcissistic view.)
No clearer or more revealing manner of this entirety of projection bias could be than you last paragraph.

QUOTE
I think you're jealous. Let me guess: you post on this from the public library, for free, after you finish work at McDonald's, and you're 16 years old, and your mother still cleans your room for you


Enough said.

I agree, Haupt, being gay is not a flaw nor terrible or something to be blamed for or ashamed of. Yet blaming others for it and about everything else is a big flaw especially if one is consistently espousing fault to others over a long period of time and over many varying circumstance, individuals and or endeavors.

Something that you will one day come to realize is a big flag of off centeredness especially when one is above the age of 30.

Youthful obviousness and seemingly intellectual supremacy and invincibility is a reality that most survive, but many, like exampled in FITS stories, do not survive unscathed and uninjured in some mental or physical way unless they understand youthfulness is an illusion of time created experiences that soon fade into wisdoms of the real world afar from the illusions of youth fantasies.

That is my opine and 25 staang anyway.

Bellatoris Mores
Munus semper primus perficiam
Numquam cladem accipiam
Numquam signa deseram
Numquam mortuum commilitonem relinquam

TUM DII DAI DII, TUM CHUA DAI CHUA!



THAT IS ALL!!
Fit2BThaied
Let's cut through and get to the heart of this post by ustrader:
QUOTE (ustrader @ Jun 23 2006, 07:18 AM) *
I knew there was something oddly illusory and deceptive about you FITs....

...I thought I deciphered you making a comment, oddly to 15 year old boy here not long ago about having a "boy friend 45 years younger than yourself. Yet, I ignored it. Now I ponder your motive?
You folks can find the post, yourself. Now, you can't begin to imagine how delicately all gay men of any age 18-108 have to behave in public, regarding boys and teenagers. Read my post to Haupt in the context of the conversation that was going on at the time.

Imagine (especially those of you who know hetero men who have migrated to Thailand from developed country) your reaction if a man of more than 63 years, a Brit, Swede, or Canadian, tells you that he's had GIRLfriends who were as young as 18 at the time (or a 71 year old with a 26 year old WIFE). You might congratulate him; you might be jealous. You might even mention it, casually, to your 15 year old daughter, but that doesn't mean you want to do anything wrong to her. Of course.

Haupt is no child, and while he may have been shocked at my mention of it, nobody reported it, to my knowledge. I was not soliciting anybody, especially a minor. By point of reference, I have a 38 year old boyfriend.

And one more thing, ustrader. Did you serve in the military? Did they allow gays then? Of course they didn't. For purposes of this discussion, let's accept John L's evaluation that my life history is bisexual, with a stronger preference for males, but an obvious ability to ACT as straight.

"To act as straight": you guys do it all the time. I'm enough of a behaviorist to agree that ALL BEHAVIOR IS LEARNED. We all learned to behave like straight men, and only a few who are younger than me and far less bisexual toward women, live as gays from an early age.They, perhaps like TQ, decided not to do that behavior. Being homosexual in the USAF gets you a court martial and a dishonorable discharge (at least that's what I understood, then).

Did you guys actually watch Brokeback Mountain? It's a story about two men, very macho cowboys who are able to penetrate vaginas and ride wild bulls, but they both realize in 1963 that they are attracted even more strongly to men than to women. That's my situation in 1963-1965. We thought a gay life would be suicidal.

No, ustrader, I wasn't deceptive. You don't understand, and you've jumped to a conclusion. Care to talk about it some more, here online?
Fit2BThaied
Note that Gore (just call him Albert Gore, Junior) has lost the plot and misstated the facts. First we had ustrader, slightly mistaken but still trying to be a gentleman, criticizing me for telling Haupt (who is 15) that I once had a boyfriend 45 years younger than me. Now our chief homophobe here, Loser Al Gore, Jr., who insists on only the facts, ma'm, claims that I claimed to have had a 15 year old boyfriend. It's there in post #22, where little Al Gore says, which is a lie, "Fit mention a 15 year old boy as a boyfriend." It's a critically important lie, as the law differentiates completely between, say, a 15 year old and an 18 year old. One's a felony; my situation wasn't. Or, how about the two neighbor boys, 19 to 21, straight or bisexual boys, who came on to me and did the gay thing to me? They were adults, and they knocked on the door asking for it, free. Not even a misdemeanor, after the Texas law was finally declared illegal.

As for Gore's list, some citations are indeed outdated, prior to the GAO comprehensive study that showed that almost all such research was always fatally flawed. Considering that source on this forum is our chief resident a homophobe, 'berty Gore Junior, I shall not check his doubtful citations.
sea_of_red
Up until the mid 80's homosexual behavior was a mental illness, using the classical theory of deviance, any human who acts outside of a statistical norm is insane. Back when I took 101, that figure was considered 2%, so Any person who exhibited behavior that 98% of the general population didn't, was considred to have a mental disorder. Homosexuals didn't like being told they were deviants, so they gained control of the Psych board and jiggerred the numbers so that homesexuals were beyond that threshold.
The only problem with that is it changes the name, but not the disorder.
It is NOT a co-in-see-dink that Serial Killers and mass murderes tend to be homosexuals.
If the P-Shrinks would stop buggering each other long enough to do some science, they need to look into why that is.
My theory is that homosexualty is a symptom of more serious disorders, and that homosexualty is just a cry for help. Lets face it, Capturing black children, abusing them , then killing and eating them is NOT normal behavior. If the homosexual that did that had been treated as a homosexual, not only he, but his entre' might still be alive today. IIRC, something like 98% of serial killers started off as just normal, garden varity queers. They weren't looking for sex, but help. Help because they knew inside that something was wrong with them. So instead of getting help they got encouragement to continue of their growth path as monsters.
Georgie-Porgie
QUOTE (John L @ Jun 24 2006, 02:34 AM) *
Give Me A Break! I simply defend the defendable. I am absolutely convinced that the homosexuality trait is genetic, and not something that someone just desides to do one fine day.


I remember kids that I knew were "different" all the way from elementary school and they all grew up to be gay.
Homosexuality is genetic. They LOVE them stiff bananas whether they want to, or not! 036.gif
John L
QUOTE (Gore_Lost @ Jun 23 2006, 11:05 PM) *
Prove genetics of homosexuality then. Isn't that your ire with the leftists? No facts. There is no proof that it is genetic.
More so, I am focusing on your peculiar desire to defend.

Why defend? Is it that you believe he is incapable of defending himself? Is this also genetic? What I find rather disturbing is your "trigger" at the mention of child molestation, you instantly come to the defense of the accused...This disturbes me. Fit mention a 15 year old boy as a boyfriend. What is your vested interest in that?

You are using the liberal dance in your argument and that is what is perplexing. If you notice US Trader called Fit on exactly what I told you of my suspicions via PM. Think I'm alone here JOHNL?


Yada, Yada, Yada. Whatever floats your boat GL. If you are so adamenaly anti homosexual, then is there perhaps a bit of worry on your part that you may indeed be "blessed" with a bit yourself? Since I am a normal hetrosexual, I do not feel threatened by their presence. Yet, because I am "normal" in that respect, I am naturally repelled by displays of homosexual affection in public, with males. I am, by nature turned off, and to be honest...........disgusted. We normal hetrosexuals are wired that way for a reason. Yet, I am not going to make a crusade against them, as you obviously are.

My suggestion; get over it! It's not worth all the aggrevation it can cause you.


And as for you TQ, GL is no more sick than you are at the other extreme. You both deserve each other. When you both pass this plane, I hope you both meet up wherever you go, and get the opportunity to 'be"itch" and moan' about each other for ALL eternity. You are both acting like little adolescents. Besides Haupt, we actually have three little boys, kicking sand into everyone's eyes.

Both of you, GET A LIFE!
John L
QUOTE (sea_of_red @ Jun 24 2006, 07:53 AM) *
My theory is that homosexualty is a symptom of more serious disorders, and that homosexualty is just a cry for help. Lets face it, Capturing black children, abusing them , then killing and eating them is NOT normal behavior. If the homosexual that did that had been treated as a homosexual, not only he, but his entre' might still be alive today. IIRC, something like 98% of serial killers started off as just normal, garden varity queers. They weren't looking for sex, but help. Help because they knew inside that something was wrong with them. So instead of getting help they got encouragement to continue of their growth path as monsters.


Let me state this again. While I am not a geneticist, my area of expertise was skeletal biology, and I studied under the great forensic anthropologist, Dr Bill Bass of Body Farm fame. I have had a great deal of genetic study under my belt. And although my degree is somewhat dated, I attempt to keep up with the science. And one of the things that anyone studying genetics learns early on is that genetic variation sometimes lends rise to further change within the system that tends to be unanticipated and undesired.

For example, we Know that homosexuals, as a group, have the highest IQ, earn the highest incomes as a result of this, have the highest rate of creativity, and tend to be the most educated. On the other hand, they have the highest rates of clinical depression, suicide, and tend to have a shorter lifespan as a whole. But this is dealing in percentages only. Hetrosexuals have more with these same traits, just not the higher percentage, because they are a more diverse group.

Now, we know that natural selection works in that it is the means in which a person who is at a certain select advantage has a better chance of passing these genes on to the next generation. Thus, the smarter, more talanted, imaginative, and exploitave of these advantages, has a select advantage. Unfortunately, to get this advantage, the statistics also necessitate that there be some throwbacks: some without the trait; and some with negative aspects along with these advantages. It's all a matter of statistics. The same thing occurs with balanced polymorphisms. A family in which the father and mother are hetrozygous with the sickling trait will produce offspring with the same trait that prevents the malaria carrying mosquito from infecting the offspring. However, statistically for every two "normal" offspring, in a group of four, one will be totally without the trait, and one that is homozygous, thus having sickle cell anemia, causing it to die out. It's all about statistics and perpetuation of the species.

Homosexuality is more complex, and the several set of genes(not one as with sickling or cystic fibrosis) have not been identified yet, but I have not doubt that they will in the future. And when they are identified, homosexuality's days will be numbered. there will be an opportunity to correct this anomalous condition in the womb, I'm certain.

But all this moaning and groaning about homos is nothing but hot aire. Some of you people, both sides, need to get over all this hullabaloo and grow up.

Enough I say! None of us are completely 'normal', and some of us are more apparantly abnormal. It's just part of the statistics. So I will resort to logic, which is severly lacking here, and say that it makes no logical sense for anyone to be attracted to another member of the same sex. It is to our 'Select Advantage' to be attracted to members of the opposite sex. It makes absolutely NO logical sense otherwise. Nobody just decides to become a homosexual, or even bisexual for that matter. It is absurd to believe otherwise. There are just too many select and social disadvantages. And if this is so, then there HAS to be something else here at work. And I contend that it is genetically induced, even if it is a genetic analomy.

I'm through with this thread: it is a total waste of my time. And It Sucks too, pardon the pun.
ustrader
QUOTE
No, ustrader, I wasn't deceptive. You don't understand, and you've jumped to a conclusion. Care to talk about it some more, here online?


Actually FITS, two points if I may. I do not need to understand and you do not need to explain the issue further, as the corner stone has been laid, the ceremony is over and all have gone home.

You have NO obligation but to be anything but the person you are, for though you presume the merits to judge, I do not posses the merits to judge but pitifully opine as factually and honestly as I can.

I am NOT sure how many times I have to say, your homo-erotica, as it may be, is of absolutely no consequence or meaning to me at all. Nor are your decpetions and life circumstances, beyond confirming their pattern and practices of implications. For that is your burden to bare or pleasure to endure, as the case may be.

I laid out, in my opine for ever it worth if anything, the real issue that I had surmised from this foray into this abyss of cynical naysay is to this comfort zone of an expressive patterns and practices of self evident projection bias that are the very stone that is laid with clarity and explicably.

QUOTE
Life is like, both a box of chocolates and a feather a blowing in the wind, on the one hand, you never can be sure what you are getting, and on the other, you never can know where it will end up.
Now that is all I have to say about that!!
- Trader's version of Forrest Gump's demure to projection bias ohmy.gif


QUOTE
All our murmurings are so many arrows shot at God Himself, and they will return upon our own hearts; they reach not Him, but they will hit us;
they hurt not Him, but they will wound us; therefore it is better to be mute than to murmur; it is dangerous to provoke a consuming fire. - James H. Aughey

Our condition never satisfies us; the present is always the worst. Though Jupiter should grant his request to each, we should continue to importune him. - Jean de la Fontaine

To tell thy mis'ries will no comfort breed;
Men help thee most, that think thou hast no need;
But if the world once thy misfortunes know,
Thou soon shall lose a friend and find a foe.- - Thomas Randolph


TUM DII DAI DII, TUM CHUA DAI CHUA!



THAT IS ALL!!
Mobster989
QUOTE (Fit2BThaied @ Jun 24 2006, 02:35 AM) *
Did you guys actually watch Brokeback Mountain? It's a story about two men, very macho cowboys who are able to penetrate vaginas and ride wild bulls, but they both realize in 1963 that they are attracted even more strongly to men than to women. That's my situation in 1963-1965. We thought a gay life would be suicidal.


I actually saw that movie and I'm glad I didn't actually pay to see it. It was trying to make me feel sad for two gay guys. If anything I felt sorry for their wives and children. I might have been more sympathic if they were born that way but in my honest opinion no one is born one way or another besides physical traits.
Thaiquila
QUOTE (Mobster989 @ Jun 25 2006, 04:19 AM) *
I actually saw that movie and I'm glad I didn't actually pay to see it. It was trying to make me feel sad for two gay guys. If anything I felt sorry for their wives and children. I might have been more sympathic if they were born that way but in my honest opinion no one is born one way or another besides physical traits.

Proves that art is wasted on the clueless.
Go see Poseidon or something, you hick.
Haupt
QUOTE (Thaiquila @ Jun 25 2006, 01:39 AM) *
Proves that art is wasted on the clueless.
Go see Poseidon or something, you hick.

BRAVO.....THANKS TQ!!!!! If that is true, mobster then explain to me George W. Bush?
Mobster989
QUOTE (Thaiquila @ Jun 25 2006, 12:39 AM) *
Proves that art is wasted on the clueless.
Go see Poseidon or something, you hick.


Art? Where's the art in that movie? "We're gay and society hates us." Boo freakin' hoo, maybe you could dub it in Spanish, French, and Italian. You might the European audience more sympathetic to your whining.

Explain G.W.? What is there to explain? The man is not fit for the job. Although the only flaw I can pin on him is his stupidity. The other flaws aren't his, they are the work of his republican puppeteers.
Thaiquila
It is a beautifully made tragic love story. It is not a political movie, it is based on a short story by a wonderful writer. Yes it is not a stupid blockbuster teenboy movie, it is a real film. Like I said, clueless.
Mobster989
Well maybe that's why I'm so "clueless" to its apparent greatness. I've never been a big fan of love stories. And I don't often spend money on movies. The last two movies I went to see in the theatre were Lord of War, which was a cool movie even though it was a little slow at times, and The Exorcism of Emily Rose, not a bad movie. Either way, it was still a waste to see. I didn't take anything away after I finished watching it except for now I sometimes call people brokeback instead of gay.
Thaiquila
Sad. Very sad. I am glad I am not you.
Mobster989
I am glad you're not me as well. You'd probably mess up what I've got going in my life. Maybe you don't think it's great but I do, and that is why you're not me.
Thaiquila
QUOTE (Mobster989 @ Jun 25 2006, 02:30 PM) *
I am glad you're not me as well. You'd probably mess up what I've got going in my life. Maybe you don't think it's great but I do, and that is why you're not me.

You think you are great?
Mobster989
QUOTE (Thaiquila @ Jun 25 2006, 09:47 AM) *
You think you are great?


Of course I am. Maybe not in the sense of leading a victorious army or saving millions from hunger or curing the sick. To the people that matter to me, my family, I am the greatest thing since sliced bread. I don't care what the rest of the world thinks about me.
Haupt
that is great.....
Thaiquila
QUOTE (Mobster989 @ Jun 25 2006, 04:09 PM) *
Of course I am. Maybe not in the sense of leading a victorious army or saving millions from hunger or curing the sick. To the people that matter to me, my family, I am the greatest thing since sliced bread. I don't care what the rest of the world thinks about me.

No doubt. But you sound like a plebian, ignorant, neocon, antigay, yahoo to me.
Haupt
Talk is cheap on the Internet...I have a lot of respect for a man who takes good care of his family...
John L
QUOTE (Thaiquila @ Jun 25 2006, 02:34 PM) *
No doubt. But you sound like a plebian, ignorant, neocon, antigay, yahoo to me.



TQ, while I do not view homosexuality as a mental disorder, in your case I will lift the restriction. You Really should consult a psychopharmacologist. And if you have to pay for it out of your own pocket, it would be well worth the cost.
Thaiquila
QUOTE (John L @ Jun 25 2006, 07:09 PM) *
TQ, while I do not view homosexuality as a mental disorder, in your case I will lift the restriction.

That isn't LOGICAL, JL
Gore_Lost
QUOTE (John L @ Jun 24 2006, 01:39 PM) *
Yada, Yada, Yada. Whatever floats your boat GL. If you are so adamenaly anti homosexual, then is there perhaps a bit of worry on your part that you may indeed be "blessed" with a bit yourself? Since I am a normal hetrosexual, I do not feel threatened by their presence. Yet, because I am "normal" in that respect, I am naturally repelled by displays of homosexual affection in public, with males. I am, by nature turned off, and to be honest...........disgusted. We normal hetrosexuals are wired that way for a reason. Yet, I am not going to make a crusade against them, as you obviously are.

My suggestion; get over it! It's not worth all the aggrevation it can cause you.
And as for you TQ, GL is no more sick than you are at the other extreme. You both deserve each other. When you both pass this plane, I hope you both meet up wherever you go, and get the opportunity to 'be"itch" and moan' about each other for ALL eternity. You are both acting like little adolescents. Besides Haupt, we actually have three little boys, kicking sand into everyone's eyes.

Both of you, GET A LIFE!

It is kind of pathetic John that you are using diversion to avoid prescription. John I wouldn't talk about sickness without clutching your seratonin uptake inhibitors.
I believe truth be known JohnL, there is some territory being revealed here that has you uncomfortable. Mostly it must be of a personal kind. You say homosexuality is genetic but science blows in your face?

Remember, that you claimed it is genetic so therefore you are DEFENDING FIT "because he can't help it". Yet science demonstrates otherwise, are you in fact junk science on this one? The funny thing about you JohnL is when you hit a roadblock you act just like the "collectivist" left you so "despise."

Let's face it John you need TQ to balance out your diatribes. Let's hear your theory or real reason for this aversion to science and push to cover up something about yourself or family? Your courage is sorely lacking... The funny thing is that those folk, in the banner you sport around (as if anyone actually believes you attended there) seem to side with me...
Haupt
its not a theory its COMMON SENSE....Why do you think so many people are gay??? What's your scientific explanation for that?
Gore_Lost
QUOTE (Haupt @ Jun 26 2006, 05:13 AM) *
its not a theory its COMMON SENSE....Why do you think so many people are gay??? What's your scientific explanation for that?
You have the brain power of common white trash and the intellectual prowess of their common above ground idol, the septic tank.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.