Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Court allows Target Website to be sued for inaccesibility
Political Topics And Discussion > All Things Political > US Political Topics
Gore_Lost
This to me stinks of a private company Mindshare Interactive suing in order to push their product. That aside, the ADA was not meant to facilitate such nonsense as this. The web is an inherently visual medium and the ramifications of this would be crippling on web commerce, especially smaller vendors. What this lawsuit is saying is that a blind persons must be facilitated in their exploration of the web site via voice. Which is kind of like saying when they go into the store someone has to walk around with them everywhere they go and describe everything they see. Frivilous exponential!

ARTICLE LINK:
http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/g...409&newsLang=en

ARTICLE:
QUOTE
September 08, 2006 12:04 PM Eastern Time
Federal Court Rules Online Businesses Must Comply with ADA; Mindshare Interactive Campaigns Advises Accessibility Audits
WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 8, 2006--A new federal ruling issued yesterday raises the bar for online businesses, requiring them to meet the terms of the Americans with Disabilities Act just as offline business have been required to do since the law's passage in 1990.

Mindshare Interactive Campaigns, LLC advises all businesses and organizations, which offer goods or provide services through websites or interactive means, to conduct accessibility audits of their online practices to see whether they might be in jeopardy as a result of this week's federal appeals court ruling.

"What this means is that any place of business that provides services, such as the opportunity to buy products on a website, is now, a place of accommodation and therefore falls under the ADA," said Kathy Wahlbin, Mindshare's Director of User Experience and expert on accessibility. "The good news is that being compliant is not difficult nor is it expensive. And it provides the additional benefit of making accessible web sites easier for search engines to find and prioritize."

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled yesterday that a retailer may be sued if its website is inaccessible to the blind. The ruling was issued in a case brought by the National Federation of the Blind against Target Corp. The suit charges that Target's website is inaccessible to the blind and therefore violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the California Disabled Persons Act.

Mindshare's Kathy Wahlbin has more than 10 years experience consulting with clients using technology for business improvement. She has won awards for design and implementation of accessible Web sites from Knowbility's Accessible Internet Rally (AIR). As the Director of User Experience Services, she uses accessibility as a cornerstone to effect change.

Mindshare Interactive Campaigns (www.mindshare.net) helps organizations leverage the communication opportunities created by technology. Since 1997, we have worked around the world with many of the leading corporations, associations, non-profit organizations and governmental entities to accomplish complex objectives. Mindshare's award-winning efforts have set the standard for innovation, creativity, and results.

Mindshare is headquartered in Washington, DC with offices in Austin, Boston, Chicago, and Los Angeles.

If you are interested in discussing accessibility for your news article on this issue, contact Kathy Wahlbin at kwahlbin@mindshare.net or via telephone at 512.652.5613.
Ubu Roi
QUOTE (Gore_Lost @ Sep 10 2006, 05:29 PM) *
This to me stinks of a private company Mindshare Interactive suing in order to push their product.


Why would you think that Mindshare Interactive is involved in the lawsuit in any way, shape, or form? They aren't, the Press Release doesn't say they are, and you are just looking for boogiemen. Granted, they are trying to drum up business with companies that are afraid of the impacts of the lawsuit, but that's just capitalism. I, for one, am a fan of capitalism.

I came across your post because I met Kathleen Wahlbin a few days ago at a conference and I was Googling her name to do some due diligence before going farther with any potential business dealings. She's been doing accessibility for years, and isn't just an ambulance chaser.

QUOTE (Gore_Lost @ Sep 10 2006, 05:29 PM) *
That aside, the ADA was not meant to facilitate such nonsense as this. The web is an inherently visual medium and the ramifications of this would be crippling on web commerce, especially smaller vendors. What this lawsuit is saying is that a blind persons must be facilitated in their exploration of the web site via voice. Which is kind of like saying when they go into the store someone has to walk around with them everywhere they go and describe everything they see. Frivilous exponential!


Anyone who really knows HTML and Web Standards understands that properly marked-up pages are, by definition, accessible. It has absolutely no bearing on how the page displays, and for the most part following standards in development both saves you boatloads of money, and makes your site rate higher in search engines. The facilitation by voice is handled by the screen reading software the blind use -- it's just a matter of making the HTML on the page have semantic meaning, so that the readers (as well as your own browser, Googlebot, or any other client software) can tell the difference between, for example, the headline on a page and any given paragraph on a page.

Any idiot can make a Web page that looks okay, but it takes an idiot that that actually knows what he's doing to make a Web page that looks exactly the same as the first idiot's page, but is much easier to maintain, much easier to find, much easier to redesign, much easier to view on cell phones, and (more or less coincidentally) much more accessible. The root problem is that for years big companies paid people that don't even know there is such a thing as an HTML specification to build them sites that look good to the marketing people. It's a failure of businesses to understand emerging technology over the past ten years, and now they are getting burned by their blindness, not just in accessibility, but in other ways too.

Again, it's just a natural part of the capitalist cycle. The companies that understand and adapt to changing conditions will make it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.