440. October surprise (10/5/06)

Foely sex scandal; the cover up trouble of Hastert; Rice was pre-warned of 911 attack .... All happened years ago but surge in this October. It's a blackmail. Demos have no ability to do so. The master mind is the Inside Group. They control media and intelligence. When CIA come out to prove they have warned Condoleezza Rice about the coming terror attack two months before 911, we saw the result of the Port Goss' resignation 4 months ago. GOP lost the control of CIA. It now becomes a weapon against themselves.

What do they want this time? A law to expand their police power? (warrantless surveillance), control of DOD? (replace Rumsfelt), or bigger, war on Iran.

They need the approval of Capital Hill on all of these. Republicans control the House and the Senate. So the people having trouble this time are all GOP.

Though media says Demo will win in Mid-term election, it is a propaganda. To put more pressure on GOP, to squeeze more concession from them.

So probably there will be an October surprise. Another terror attack in US, (likely a dirty bomb attack) to justify another war. Like what 911 has done. Thus, GOP will still remain in control. Anyhow, the inside group prefers a war-loving Party.

The October surprise will be a big event, a nice distract for a framed case. I received a letter from an inspecting company in the end of September. It says they are authorized by my insurance company to inspect my house (exterior) in next few weeks. That I should examine the photo ID of their representative if I am home. I think it is part of Feds' October plan. I have my fire policy with that insurance company for 20 years. This is the first time they request an inspection. Feds know I am home all the time. They have no problem to have any ID. The inspecting company may belong to an Inspecting Bureau.

Not a coincidence, my wife is arranged for a China tour between 10/10 to 10/18. Her last tour was in later September last year when a big framed case had been arranged on 9/24/05.
Though she cooperated with Feds she had been planned to death in each framed case.

Beware of an October surprise.

Did she have a good time?

Bush and Lieberman, American zionists

He starts war in Mid-east, for the security of Israel. And he wants more (Iran and Syria) Bush doesn't care for the interest of US. He let American fight and die for his master. Says it's for Freedom. He is not a Republican. He is an American Zionist like Joe Lieberman. (Who is not a Demo, too). Both party now start to realize it. The reddest state rises to slam Bush.

Re: Salt Lake City, Utah mayor slams 'dishonest, war-mongering' Bush

David Edwards
Published: Thursday August 31, 2006

During a rally held in Salt Lake City yesterday, thousands cheered Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson as he blasted George Bush as a "dishonest, war-mongering, human-rights-violating president."

Utah is considered to be the "reddest" state, showing that there is growing debate about the Iraq war even in friendly Bush territory.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Video_Sa...leads_0831.html

Re: "Bush breaks rank to boost independent's bid
18 August 2006

WASHINGTON — President George Bush gave a boost to Connecticut senator Joe Lieberman's re-election bid as an independent this week by taking the rare step of refusing to endorse the Republican candidate running for Lieberman's US senate seat.

It is highly unusual for a sitting president not to endorse a senate candidate from his own party and suggests the depth of the political machinations over Lieberman's seat after his defeat in last week's Democratic primary by Ned Lamont, a well-financed challenger running on an antiwar platform.

http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/worl...x?ID=BD4A252493

Quote, "Lieberman leads Lamont 70 percent to 9 percent among likely Republican voters, with 18 percent for Schlesinger, and 58-36 among likely independent voters. Likely Democratic voters back Lamont, 55 percent to 36 percent." (AccessNorthGA)

1. Lieberman is more a Republican than a Demo.
This proves there is no big difference between Demo and GOP. Election is only a game, democracy is a hoax. All the politicians work for one master: the Inside Group.

2. Though media said most Americans are anti- Iraq war, once it fell on their favorite candidate, the opinion won't work. Lieberman voted for Iraq war. He collaborates with Bush pretty good. It proves media works for the Inside group. Poll is only a mind control tool. When they decide to keep Lieberman on the seat, the media push out a poll to convince public that Lieberman's victory is inevitable.

The question is: Do people vote to their opinion, or vote to the poll? How can anti-war people vote for a pro-war candidate?

3. US politicians are controlled by Israel. The mid-east war is for the security of Israel. So those pro-war politicians will stay because there are more war (Iran and Syria) waiting for them to approve. Through Lieberman's case you can see:: Israel rule the world by proxy. They let Americans fight and die for them.

This is how the Inside group rules the US: They pick up politicians by rigged election. (control intelligence) And justify the election by poll. (control media.)

ROFL!

The funny thing is this "dude's" writing style is like he had transcribed a conversation betweens the voices in his head.

intimidation by war

Bush's regime is built over a stage of "terror, war, security". Since he becomes president, there is a continue terror attack, wars, security alarm.

Now his popularity is in lowest poit. To save his regime and his party, there is more "terror attack" coming. And he will say: "You are threatened" and ask for more power and money.

E.T., call home. kathaksung more vague than ustrader. hard to understand. bahtawhatasatang. poit a puthha. Vulcans say Farenghi bad.

Indeed, I believe Kathaksung is a common Farenghi name

new wars ahead

This very interesting and informative article by our Washington friend Jeff Steinberg fits well with our latest transmissions. It appears in the Nov. 17, 2006 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.

Cheney and Neo-Cons Plotting More Wars

by Jeffrey Steinberg


On March 11, 2003, as final preparations were under way for the neo-cons' greatest triumph--the invasion of Iraq--New Yorker magazine investigative reporter Seymour Hersh exposed an extortion scheme by neo-con Richard Perle, to extract tens of millions of dollars out of the Saudi royal family, in league with the infamous Iran-Contra arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi. The scheme involved a Perle company, Trireme Partners LP, which wanted a piece of the billions of dollars in homeland security contracts soon to be issued by the Kingdom. The proposal, according to Prince Bandar bin Sultan, then the Saudi Ambassador in Washington, smacked of a quid pro quo: Perle, a leading critic of the Saudi regime, would drop the propaganda barrage and the calls for regime change, coming out of his Defense Policy Board, and the Saudis would cough up.

Several senior U.S. intelligence officials recently told EIR that some higher-ups in the Saudi royal family, perhaps including Prince Bandar, who is now the national security advisor to King Abdullah, regret that they didn't take the bait and pay off Perle and his partners back in January 2003. A few million dollars might have saved them several years of headaches, as the neo-con propaganda Wurlitzer waged a non-stop regime-change campaign against them. But even more to the point, suddenly, the Saudis, along with several other Sunni Arab regimes, find themselves as strange bedfellows with Washington's neo-cons and with the Ehud Olmert government in Israel--in common cause against Iran.

A Nov. 3, 2006 teaser from Vanity Fair magazine revealed that the neo-cons are going through a major retooling--wiping their hands of the entire Iraq fiasco, and placing the blame for the failure squarely on the shoulders of President George W. Bush and his team of national security incompetents and nincompoops. In a preview of a story to appear in the January 2007 Vanity Fair, author David Rose delivered excerpts from interviews he conducted in October 2006 with some of the cream of the neo-con crap--starting with the ``Prince of Darkness,'' Perle himself, and also including Kenneth Adelman, who gained infamy by proposing that the U.S. Lovers of Iraqi faker Ahmed Chalabi, and Iraq warhawks to a man, these neo-cons are now saying that if they had it to do over again, knowing that the Bush-Cheney-Rice team was the most incompetent national security management group in the post-World War II history of America, they would have opted for an alternative to war.

In a scene worthy of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, these modern-day Brutuses have stabbed President Bush and Condi Rice in the back. As far as the neo-cons are concerned, according to a number of informed Washington sources, both Iraq and George W. Bush are yesterday's news. They are now preparing to survive the fall of the House of Bush, and are already making plans for the next confrontations: against Iran and Russia, to name the top two targets du jour.

While the Bush Presidency is flaming out in the aftermath of what has been dubbed the ``Nov. 7th Massacre,'' the neo-cons are still a formidable force inside the Republican Party, with some leading neo-con superstars, like John Podhoretz, already touting Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) as the elephant they intend to ride back into the Oval Office. Across the aisle, another crew of hardcore neo-cons is preparing to surface within the Democratic Party, should a donkey take the Presidency in 2008. It is reminiscent of the Jimmy Carter era, when scores of life-long ``Scoop Jackson Democrats,'' led by Perle, Stephen Bryen, Ledeen, Gaffney, and Elliott Abrams, slithered over to the GOP as ``Reagan Democrats,'' and, after Ronald Reagan's landslide victory in 1980 over Jimmy Carter, occupied top civilian posts at the Pentagon, and cushy consulting jobs with the Reagan National Security Council.

Whichever party lands in the White House come January 2009, the neo-cons hope to be there to share in the spoils. Either way, they are busily organizing a ``Get Iran'' war alliance with frightened Sunni regimes in the Persian Gulf and Arab world and Israel--to make sure that the Bush-Cheney regime commits one more fatal atrocity--a military strike on Iran's purported secret nuclear weapons sites--before leaving office (see preceding article).

To make sure that this Iran war happens before Team Bush leaves office, the neo-cons are working through their one reliable partner remaining inside the regime--Vice President Dick Cheney. Cheney's office remains Neo-con Central, with David Wurmser and John Hannah still on staff. Elliott Abrams remains the Cheney ``mole'' at the National Security Council.

According to Middle East and Washington sources, this crew was responsible, earlier this year, for trashing all efforts by the Syrian regime of Bashar Assad to reopen direct peace talks with Israel, talks that no Israeli regime prior to that of Ariel Sharon, would have flat-out rejected, no matter how much pressure came down from Washington.

More recently, they are reportedly pushing a covert weapons-smuggling operation into the West Bank, arming Fatah factions to launch what would rapidly become a full-scale civil war against Hamas. The noted retired Israeli general, Shlomo Brom, in a recent paper for the Jaffe Center at Tel Aviv University, warned that such an outbreak of communal violence among the Palestinians would be bad for Israel, provoking a likely split between a Fatah-controlled West Bank and a Hamas-run Gaza Strip. Both sides would be vying to prove that they are more effective in terrorizing Israel, through suicide bombings and rocket attacks, the general warned, and this would make life unbearable in the Jewish state.

Arab sources have added that in his recent trip to Washington, Lebanese Druze leader Walid Jumblatt was given a similar offer of ``covert military aid'' to take on Hezbollah inside that war-ruined nation, which still hasn't recovered from its 15-year civil war (1975-90). Such covert operations, aimed at provoking the neo-cons' beloved perpetual warfare throughout the Eastern Mediterranean region, do not depend on Pentagon muscle, so the departure of Donald Rumsfeld from the scene, and his replacement by former CIA Director Robert Gates, a Brent Scowcroft and James Baker III ally (and presumable a Dick Cheney enemy), does not necessarily interfere with the game.

In fact, as the Democrats prepare to take back control of the U.S. House and Senate in January 2007, they face a world map of hot-spots, all set to blow, with the slightest provocation (see accompanying map).

Several senior Washington intelligence veterans, and one regional vice president of a major U.S. defense firm, say that their greatest fear--between now and the New Year when the Democrats take the keys to Capitol Hill back--is a ``Gulf of Tonkin'' incident, a provocation covertly arranged originating from Washington, that would provide the pretext for war. The most likely target of such a scheme: Iran. The most likely architect of such an operation: Dick Cheney and his remaining coterie of neo-con troublemakers and whatever assets they have recruited from within the Special Forces community and the ``black operations'' side of the intelligence community. One burning question is whether President Bush has already signed a Presidential Intelligence Finding, authorizing these covert tricks.

On Oct. 10, 2006, the web-based magazine World Politics Watch ran a provocative story, echoing the new neo-con scheme, under the headline ``Mideast Realignment: Could Iran Unite Arabs and Israelis?'' Noting the rumors, officially denied by both sides, that Prince Bandar had secretly met in Jordan with a top Israeli government official, Frida Ghitis wrote that ``a handful of Middle East observers were not surprised to hear of possible talks between Israel and the kingdom. That's because they political transformation is fear of Shi'ite Iran by Sunni Arabs. As a result, the traditional enemy of Arabs, Israel, could gradually begin developing a subtle but powerful alliance with Sunni Muslim regimes in the Arab world.... It is this natural convergence of interests that has the potential to recast the political landscape from the traditional one of Arabs versus Israelis, which has dominated the Middle East since the late 1940s, into a Sunni vs. Shi'a alignment, with Israel and Sunni governments on the same side.''

This, Washington sources emphasize, is the latest neo-con wet dream. For years the neo-cons have been preaching their own brand of Leon Trotsky's ``Permanent Revolution,'' masked in the cry for ``democracy.'' From the start of the Bush-Cheney regime up to recent months, the number one target of these latter-day Jacobins had been what Middle Eastern historians referred to as the ``Sunni Stability Belt,'' the ruling combination of hardline monarchies and dictatorships that kept the oil patch safe and stable from the time of Sykes-Picot (1916) on. Now that the neo-con ``Shi'ite Card'' has turned Iraq into Hell-on-Earth, the flexible neo-con fantasists have modified their rhetoric, to suddenly find common cause with the very Sunni Arab monarchs and dictators whom they targetted only months ago, with such schemes as their 1996 ``A Clean Break.''

The neo-cons are shameless sophists, who have no problem distorting the truth beyond recognition--if it suits their goal of perpetual power. Will the Sunni Arab lions and the Israelis be so stupid as to walk into this trap?

Stay tuned.

James Morris <justicequest2000@yahoo.com> wrote:
Bush Doesn't Fear Attack on Iran: Israeli Envoy:

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=63301

I like the improved english, take course eh?

I personally perfer the Harry Potter conspiracies of this Jeffrey Steinberg's wartlock natterings;

The Largest Empire In the History of the World

by Jeffrey Steinberg
Printed in The American Almanac, August 25, 1997.


http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/largest.htm

Likewise this LaRhouche EIR rendition of its a conspiracy ya'll hear!!!

Cheney Plots New Wars To Save His Hide
by Jeffrey Steinberg


http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3241..._plots_war.html

And as well;;

Britain's Invisible Empire Unleashes The Dogs of War, by Jeffrey Steinberg, The Executive Intelligence Review, March, 1997

Again from EIR, the palookavillian rescidences of the Le cocka Rouches gropies of the KKK's favorite son, Lyndon LaRouche's, that once bearer of the 1960's far left socialist standads now turned right wing far to the right of neo-cons conspiracists soemsay is a FAR RIGHT wing, Flag wrapped, facisist populous movement?

Some Le cocka rouhce witisms;

QUOTE

Judaism

"Judaism is the religion of a caste of subjects of Christianity, entirely molded by ingenious rabbis to fit into the ideological and secular life of Christianity. In short, a selfsustaining Judaism never existed and never could exist. As for Jewish culture otherwise, it is merely the residue left to the Jewish home after everything saleable has been marketed to the Goyim."

"The Case of Ludwig Feuerbach", Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., (under pen name L. Marcus), The Campaigner, December 1973

"America must be cleansed for its righteous war by the immediate elimination of the Nazi Jewish Lobby and other British agents from the councils of government, industry, and labor."

"A War-winning Strategy", Editorial, New Solidarity, March 1978

The Beatles

"The Beatles had no genuine musical talent, but were a product shaped according to British Psychological Warfare Division (Tavistock) specifications, and promoted in Britain by agencies which are controlled by British intelligence."

"Why Your Child Became A Drug Addict" Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Campaigner Special Report, Copyright 1978

Adolf Hitler

"The first, and most important fact to be recognized concerning the Hitler regime, is that Adolf Hitler was put into power in Germany on orders from London. The documentation of this matter is abundant and conclusive."

"Humboldt Versus Hitler", Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., The Campaigner, August 1978

Henry A. Kissinger

"Under Henry A. Kissinger's two terms as Acting President of the United States, agencies committed to genocide were made institutions of both the National Security Council and State Department."

"The Frameup of Harrison Williams", Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Executive Intelligence Review, September 22, 1981


AIDS

"So far, the world's leading experts see no way in which the Soviet biological-warfare apparatus could have created AIDS in a test-tube. However, it is in the strategic interests of Moscow to see to it that the West does nothing to stop this pandemic; within a few years, at the present rates, the spread of AIDS in Asia, Africa, Western Europe, and the Americas would permit Moscow to take over the world almost without firing a shot."

"The Lesson of the Merchant of Venice", Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Executive Intelligence Review, November 1, 1985

Warmongers

"Who is pushing the world toward war? is the forces behind the World Wildlife Fund, the Club of Rome, and the heritage of H.G. Wells and the evil Bertrand Russell."

"An Open Letter to President Brezhnev", Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Executive Intelligence Review, June 2, 1981

THA T
IS
A LL!

Hitler bad. Idi Amin bad. Saddam Hussein bad. Wasoxochalians from star system Xkilrtpw very bad.

Bush wants Iraq civil war. Let Arabs fight against Arabs. That's why he refuse to have a diplomatic contact with Syria and Iran. What a cunning tactic.

Quote, "Behind the Cheney Trip to Riyadh
(Reprinted with permission of Executive Intelligence Review)
by Jeffrey Steinberg

Nov. 27, 2006 (EIRNS)—A well-placed and highly reliable source has provided the following account of Vice President Dick Cheney's Nov. 25, 2006 visit to Saudi Arabia.

The essential message delivered to Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah by Vice President Cheney was that there is no basis for dialogue with Iran. The U.S. position in the region has been weakened, and therefore a new security architecture must be established, particularly in the Persian Gulf, to contain and counter Iran's growing influence. Already, NATO has been in dialogue with Qatar and Kuwait, in pursuit of closer, upgraded cooperation. Cheney proposed to establish a new regional balance of power, through a Sunni Arab alliance with Israel, to confront the Iranian threat. Cheney argued that to negotiate with Iran at this time would be tantamount to surrender. A new military organization will be built, involving the Gulf Cooperation Council states, Egypt, and Jordan. NATO and the United States will be closely involved, and Israel will be a de facto participant. These moves led by Cheney obviously aim to pre-empt adoption by the Bush Administration of any recommendations from the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group, to initiate diplomatic talks with Iran.

Cheney took the lead in proposing this new security architecture. There is, at this point, a consensus inside the Bush Administration to pursue this policy. When President Bush arrives later this week in Amman, Jordan, to meet with Iraq's Prime Minister Maliki, he may also hold secret talks with several senior Syrian officials. In that meeting, President Bush will bluntly offer Syria the opportunity to break its ties to Iran and join in the emerging Sunni Arab bloc.

The approach to Syria coincides with a major effort, within Lebanon, to force Michel Aoun to break his alliance with Hezbollah, in the wake of the assassination of Industry Minister Pierre Gemayel. Over the weekend, there was a meeting of leading Maronites, sponsored by Patriarch Sfeir, aimed at tightening the pressure on Aoun to break with Hezbollah, and join a Sunni Arab, Christian, Druze coalition to counter Hezbollah's power. Were the Syrians to accept the Bush offer (highly unlikely), they would be expected to pressure Hezbollah to disarm, as a condition for negotiations to get the Golan Heights back from Israel.

Condi Rice's planned meeting with Mahmoud Abbas and Ehud Olmert is aimed at kick-starting the Israeli-Palestinian talks. But the key to the Israeli policy will be to complete the construction of the wall, and to build similar walls of separation along the border with Lebanon. The argument is that both Hamas and Hezbollah represent extensions of Iran's influence into the areas bordering on Israel, and they must be contained. The "peace" offer being put on the table will center on these walls of separation.

Iran is already aware of these Cheney-led initiatives. While Arab governments will assume that Iran will react and respond to the attempt to create this Sunni Arab-U.S.-Israel security architecture to confront Iran by playing for sectarian conflict in Iraq, Lebanon and elsewhere, sources caution that Iran is taking a more sophisticated view. Recurring statements by President Ahmadinejad are calculated to instigate an Israeli attack on Iran's purported nuclear weapons sites. Iran anticipates some kind of attack on these sites—either by the United States or Israel. Iran would prefer an Israeli attack for several reasons. First, the United States has far more significant military capabilities to strike Iran than Israel does.

Second, any Israeli attack on a Muslim country would trigger a revolt on the Arab streets. Iran carefully studied the response of the population throughout the Persian Gulf and Arab world to the Israeli attacks on Lebanon this summer. They anticipate massive Arab support, across the sectarian Shi'ite-Sunni divide, for Iran, in the event of an Israeli strike.

http://www.larouchepac.com/pages/press_rel...ey_riyadh.shtml

Whoever is calling Richard Perle "the prince of darkness" has probably violated a copyright law. Owners of old British motorcycles know that the owner of Lucas electrics was the prince of darkness.

Well of course. Killing is to Muslims what soccer is to Europeons. A passion and a sport. Brilliant move by Bush to maneuver these rabid pigs into killing each other. Instead of the infidels.

Bush insiders provoked Iraq civil war. They need more troops in Mid-east for new war: War against Iran and Syria.

Quote, "Robert Fisk: Seen through a Syrian lens,

'unknown Americans' are provoking civil war in Iraq

By Robert Fisk

04/29/06 "The Independent" -- - In Syria, the world appears through a glass, darkly. As dark as the smoked windows of the car which takes me to a building on the western side of Damascus where a man I have known for 15 years - we shall call him a "security source", which is the name given by American correspondents to their own powerful intelligence officers - waits with his own ferocious narrative of disaster in Iraq and dangers in the Middle East.

His is a fearful portrait of an America trapped in the bloody sands of Iraq, desperately trying to provoke a civil war around Baghdad in order to reduce its own military casualties. It is a scenario in which Saddam Hussein remains Washington's best friend, in which Syria has struck at the Iraqi insurgents with a ruthlessness that the United States wilfully ignores. And in which Syria's Interior Minister, found shot dead in his office last year, committed suicide because of his own mental instability.

The Americans, my interlocutor suspected, are trying to provoke an Iraqi civil war so that Sunni Muslim insurgents spend their energies killing their Shia co-religionists rather than soldiers of the Western occupation forces. "I swear to you that we have very good information," my source says, finger stabbing the air in front of him. "One young Iraqi man told us that he was trained by the Americans as a policeman in Baghdad and he spent 70 per cent of his time learning to drive and 30 per cent in weapons training. They said to him: 'Come back in a week.' When he went back, they gave him a mobile phone and told him to drive into a crowded area near a mosque and phone them. He waited in the car but couldn't get the right mobile signal. So he got out of the car to where he received a better signal. Then his car blew up."

Impossible, I think to myself. But then I remember how many times Iraqis in Baghdad have told me similar stories. These reports are believed even if they seem unbelievable. And I know where much of the Syrian information is gleaned: from the tens of thousands of Shia Muslim pilgrims who come to pray at the Sayda Zeinab mosque outside Damascus. These men and women come from the slums of Baghdad, Hillah and Iskandariyah as well as the cities of Najaf and Basra. Sunnis from Fallujah and Ramadi also visit Damascus to see friends and relatives and talk freely of American tactics in Iraq.

"There was another man, trained by the Americans for the police. He too was given a mobile and told to drive to an area where there was a crowd - maybe a protest - and to call them and tell them what was happening. Again, his new mobile was not working. So he went to a landline phone and called the Americans and told them: 'Here I am, in the place you sent me and I can tell you what's happening here.' And at that moment there was a big explosion in his car."

Just who these "Americans" might be, my source did not say. In the anarchic and panic-stricken world of Iraq, there are many US groups - including countless outfits supposedly working for the American military and the new Western-backed Iraqi Interior Ministry - who operate outside any laws or rules. No one can account for the murder of 191 university teachers and professors since the 2003 invasion - nor the fact that more than 50 former Iraqi fighter-bomber pilots who attacked Iran in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war have been assassinated in their home towns in Iraq in the past three years.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12885.htm

The so said civil war is done by US controlled Al Qaida and special commandoes.
Quote, "CIA controled Interior Ministry death squads?

Interior Ministry (130,000 are police, and 10,000 special commandoes) murder:

(Neocon) Bayan Jabr is the latest appointment
...the front man, & let the Israelis run it.

The secret commando units are a mix of Iraqis, Kurds, mercenaries, lead by Israelis.

Who Started The Death Squads?

Bush's neocons ...James Steele & Steven Casteel who were assigned to Paul Bremer, & they established the Interior Ministry's police force. CIA/Special Forces/DEA .... Previously, they established 'counter insurgents' (Death Squads) in S. America....

The Death Squads are a small core of the police. ...leaders are mossad, & the structure consists of Israeli control over mercenaries, & ex-Iraqi military.

The Shias will kill Sunnis, and the Sunnis will kill Shias. Marines will be told it's insurgents, & Muslims foreign fighters. When it's time for Iran, the Zionists will hit America w/ a false flag that points at Iran.

http://judicial-inc.biz/iraqi_death_squads.htm

To make it more like an insurgence, they kill US troops too. Nothing strange, in 911, they had killed US citizens to justify the Mid-east war.

Sunday, September 25, 2005

Israel Kills US Troops, AIPAC Spies on Investigators
By Cyte

The federal indictment says that AIPAC heads Steven Rosen (director of foreign policy) and Keith Weissman (senior Middle East analyst) sought and obtained classified information about attacks on US troops in Iraq. They also sought and obtained a classified FBI report on the Khobar Tower bombing.

Why is Israel interested in secret reports about attacks on American troops?

US Army Col. J. Denim says the Khobar attackers picked a building that was visited by Israeli advisors. Army bomb experts found residues from explosives that are only available to the US military and Israel.

Marines also believe that it is not Iraqis, but Israeli infiltrators in command and intel who are behind the ambushes.

http://cytations.blogspot.com/2005/09/isra...c-spies-on.html

The Provocateur State:
Is the CIA Behind the Iraqi "Insurgents"--and Global Terrorism?
by Frank Morales
WORLD WAR 4 REPORT, May 10, 2005 <http://WW4Report.com>
www.globalresearch.ca <http://globalresearch.ca> 12 May 2005 The URL of this article is: <http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MOR505A.html>

According to a classified document prepared for Rumsfeld by his Defense Science Board, the new organization--the "Proactive, Preemptive Operations Group (P2OG)"--would actually carry out secret missions designed to provoke terrorist groups into committing violent acts. The P2OG, a 100-member, so-called "counter-terrorist" organization with a $100-million-a-year budget, would ostensibly target "terrorist leaders," but according to P2OG documents procured by Arkin, would in fact carry out missions designed to "stimulate reactions" among "terrorist groups"--which, according to the Defense Secretary's logic, would subsequently expose them to "counter-attack" by the good guys. In other words, the plan is to execute secret military operations (assassinations, sabotage, "deception") which would intentionally result in terrorist attacks on innocent people, including Americans--essentially, to "combat terrorism" by causing it!

WORLD WAR 4 REPORT, May 10, 2005

http://WW4Report.com

www.globalresearch.ca

http://globalresearch.ca

12 May 2005 The URL of this article is:

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MOR505A.html

Bush needs insurgence

More death is needed to convince people that US has to stay in Mid-East as long as warmonger wish.

Re: "Insurgent" bombs made in USA
Then there was this one.

On May 13, 2005, a 64 years old Iraqi farmer, Haj Haidar Abu Sijjad, took his tomato load in his pickup truck from Hilla to Baghdad, accompanied by Ali, his 11 years old grandson. They were stopped at an American check point and were asked to dismount. An American soldier climbed on the back of the pickup truck, followed by another a few minutes later, and thoroughly inspected the tomato filled plastic containers for about 10 minutes. Haj Haidar and his grandson were then allowed to proceed to Baghdad.

A minute later, his grandson told him that he saw one of the American soldiers putting a grey melon size object in the back among the tomato containers. The Haj immediately slammed on the brakes and stopped the car at the side of the road, at a relatively far distance from the check point. He found a time bomb with the clock ticking tucked among his tomatoes. He immediately recognized it, as he was an ex-army soldier. Panicking, he grabbed his grandson and ran away from the car. Then, realizing that the car was his only means of work, he went back, took the bomb and carried it in fear. He threw it in a deep ditch by the side of the road that was dug by Iraqi soldiers in preparation for the war, two years ago.

Upon returning from Baghdad, he found out that the bomb had indeed exploded, killing three sheep and injuring their shepherd in his head. He thanked God for giving him the courage to go back and remove the bomb, and for the luck in that the American soldiers did not notice his sudden stop at a distance and his getting rid of the bomb.

"They intended it to explode in Baghdad and claim that it is the work of the 'terrorists', or 'insurgents' or who call themselves the 'Resistance'.

I decided to expose them and asked your reporter to take me to Baghdad to tell you the story. They are to be exposed as they now want to sow strife in Iraq and taint the Resistance after failing to defeat it militarily. Do not forget to mention my name. I fear nobody but God, as I am a follower of Muqtada al-Sadir."

The background and admission of guilt for such satanic shenanigans was clearly outlined in Frank Morales' piece on globalresearch.ca: "The Provocateur State: Is the CIA Behind the Iraqi 'Insurgents' - and Global Terrorism," by Frank Morales <<http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MOR505A.html>> clearly demonstrates how Donald Rumsfeld said he was going to do exactly what these three sorry episodes show he actually did.

Little green men!!

From Palestinian Media Watch, a video posted at a Hamas web site shows terrorist leader Yasser Ghalban, killed last week by Palestinians in internal fighting, talking about the wider Palestinian Islamic ideology: to conquer and subjugate the world under Islam.

We will rule the nations, by Allah’s will, the USA will be conquered, Israel will be conquered, Rome and Britain will be conquered...

The Jihad for Allah... is the way of Truth and the way for Salvation and the way which will lead us to crush the Jews and expel them from our country Palestine.

Just as the Jews ran from Gaza, the Americans will run from Iraq and Afghanistan and the Russians will run from Chechnya, and the Indian will run from Kashmir, and our children will be released from Guantanamo.

The prisoners will be released by Allah’s will, not by peaceful means and not by agreements, but they will be released by the sword, they will be released by the gun.

Another kafar false prophet of Islam, gone to paradise and the worms from whense he came....

Any one with common sense know it's not a reality. It can only be viewed as a negative propaganda from Bush's disinformation office or from Mossad's moles. And you are proving you are one of them.

------------

Quote, "The War and the New York Times
By ALEXANDER COCKBURN

The war in Iraq, one of the most disastrous military enterprises in the history of the Republic, has the New York Times' fingerprints all over it. The role the newspaper played in fomenting the 2003 attack is now one of the best known sagas in journalistic history, as embodied in the reports of Judy Miller, working in collusion with Iraqi exiles and US spooks to concoct Saddam's imaginary arsenal of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

But so fixated have many Times critics been on the WMD/ Miller saga, that they have failed to notice that across the past sixth months the Times has been waging an equally disingenuous campaign to escalate American troop levels in this doomed enterprises.

http://counterpunch.org/cockburn01062007.html

quote, "Why is the US press silent on Brzezinski’s warnings of war against Iran?
By Barry Grey in Washington DC
3 February 2007

Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author
The major national newspapers and most broadcast outlets failed even to report Thursday’s stunning testimony by former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Brzezinski, national security adviser to President Jimmy Carter, is among the most prominent figures within the US foreign policy establishment. He delivered a scathing critique of the war in Iraq and warned that the policy of the Bush administration was leading inevitably to a military confrontation with Iran which would have disastrous consequences for US imperialism.

Most significant and disturbing was Brzezinski’s suggestion that the Bush administration might manufacture a pretext to justify a military attack on Iran. Presenting what he called a “plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran,” Brzezinski laid out the following series of events: “Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks, followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure, then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the US blamed on Iran, culminating in, quote/unquote, ‘defensive’ US military action against Iran...”

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/feb2007/brze-f03.shtml

The first thing that most conspiracy theorists fail to realize (because they are being ultrasonically fed the mind control substance XgM32Crp), is that the planet earth is a sub-atomic particle on a molecule of U235 on a guided missile in the star system FoolUAll. And, that the dwarf android called "Adolph Hitler" was the offspring of Eleanor Roosevelt and Eugene V. Debs. Furthermore, the dialectic philosopher was not named Hegel, but in fact was the charismatic troglodyte named Androlinsk Metastavinovasitch, a drunken Russian peddler of rotten durian in Anatolia.....

Who will be that modern "300"? Bush, Cheney, Rumsfelt, Wolfowitze....? Naked, with tanned muscle?

Remember Bush in pilot uniform when he announced that "Mission is accomplished"? That's a similar psychological operation. To show people he is a conquerer. A winner. Either in uniform or naked.

But there is a big flaw with this movie. Persian was invader two thousand years ago, today they are potential victim to an invasion. So the figure is reversed. Bush is in the role of Persian king Xerxes who led an army ready to invade Iran. The US also has its fleet, several striking group gathered at the Gulf.

Though the film try to hint Bush is a hero. He is not. It's an unequal war. Bush has more advanced weapon that can 'bomb Iran to stone ages". He is a coward who only bully at weak and small.

Hollywood became a propaganda tool of the government.

Who wants Iraq war?

On March 13th Representative Pelosi was booed when she addressed the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee when she said she wants to pull the troops out of Iraq ("The Hill"). A few weeks ago we saw that Jewish Hollywood Directors are turning against Hillary. Why? She is against the war. Israel feels that if the US pulls out of Iraq, it will be a threat to its security.

The point is that AIPAC does not represent the vast majority of American Jews who support the Democratic Party and want our troop out of that conflict. However, there organization has tremendous economic and political power and its seems they would like to destroy the hopes of the party to win in 2008.

http://boards.historychannel.com/thread.js...1228�

The problem with having a hollow head, is the echo dancing around in that emptiness between the right and left ears, eh ka thak sung a real bad song?

US and Israel intelligence are carring out a policy to provoke a civil war in Iraq. The purpose is to let Iraqis to kill Iraqis. Well, the terrorist is there, withdraw troops is cut and run. Bush says. So Bush can have US troops stay in Mid-east until the next war - a war on Iran or Syria.

That's why we saw Al Qaida (a special force to act on behalf of US intelligence) launched attack at Shiite shirine to started the conflict between Sunni and Shiite. We already know the 911 attack was in the name of Al Qaida which gave Bush the justification to start the war in Mid-east - war on Afghanistan and Iraq.

The US and Israel intelligence controlled death squad of Iraqis government which is used to kill Sunni people. On the other hand they controlled insurgence and Al Qaida to kill Shiite civilians by car bombing. That is how they created a civil war in Iraq.

Grand Opening! Coming to a neighborhood near you!!!

Where the car bomb came from?

Here is another case that US Army plant it to provoke a civil war in Iraq.

He got suspicious because the Americans call him ask if he is already in the market

Iraqirabita tell a story about an Iraq interpreter working in an American military base was sent to the city by his bosses to by computer hardware, he took the car but he stopped by friends.

He got suspicious because the Americans call him every now and then asking him if he already in the market, he parked the car in the middle of nowhere and answered yes, few minutes after that the car exploded. The guy left the country after that to Turkey.

For more information in English on American black budget special operations money being used to set up so called suicide bombing, below

http://www.thewe.cc/contents/more/archive2...suicide_bombing

When I read the story of how students jumped off the floor to escape from the killer, I think of Iraqi people. The students bear the panic for a couple dozen of minutes. Iraqi people are under constant pressure of being bombed, kidnapped and killed for more than four years. Yet the situation worsens.

Is Iraq a big Virginia Tech? Does Bush play the role of Cho Seung Hui? He intrudes Iraq and shoot people at his own will. What is this war for? How can Bush still be the US president? A killer of massacre.

ANSWER:: We know where and who you are San Jose boy...

The dark side of Federal law enforcement agency

http://hometown.aol.com/kathaksung/myhomepage/profile.html

MY AMERICAN NIGHTMARE...

http://hometown.aol.com/sunkat563/myhomepage/profile.html


http://hometown.aol.com/katsung563/myhomepage/profile.html

The dark side of USA

http://hometown.aol.com/katsung563/myhomepage/profile.html

There were many of This kind of harrasment late. But compare to isotopic money and microwave radiation and fluorescent lamp killing, it's nothing.

http://forums.delphiforums.com/police915/messages/?msg=1.1

1/24/2002, titled Psyco

"I am not kidding at all, I think I have read enough, time to call my friends at my former job at Homeland Security and give them a heads up on this dude, he is readly to implode I fear...
Why do you take that much time and trouble to post to a 'pyscho' repeatedly? Even put a question here? Yes, it's easy to use a gun and made it look like a suicide or robbery. But since so many people know my story, if it happened, whom will be the big suspect?

Kat Hak Sung "

http://forums.delphiforums.com/police915/messages/?msg=1.1

More bizarre here...

http://p067.ezboard.com/fdenverpostnewsfrm...picID=161.topic

More trolling::

http://talk.ocregister.com/search.php?searchid=1259148

more ;



Name: Kat Hak Sung
Age/Sex: 55 Male
City: san jose
State/Province:
Country: usa
Homepage: http://hometown.aol.com/kathaksung/myhomepage/profile.html
ICQ Number:



The ultimate spinmiester of conspiracy. A rambling Internet loser of a poster who is ubiquitous but never answers a question directly.

Dude, get to the point, you're going kathaksung.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=kathaksung

http://forums.shoutwire.com/search.php?searchid=83



http://forums.armageddononline.org/member.php?u=720

Sorry kathaksung, you are banned from using this forum! ... Director of Marketing Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Northern California Posts: 1219 Kathaksung, ...

aah!

You've missed the point, my flightless friend.

Hak Sung is a prolific poster. - He megaposts his missives everywhere, but if you'd like to know mo0re about the real Mr Kat (and perhaps discover why he spends more time masturbating thinking, you could always follow this link:http://jollyroger.com/zz/ylawd/LawEnforcemen thall/cas/48.html

If we are to believe his claims concerning his genitalia, then we should surely be sympathetic. Hak Sun claims to be 'hung like a guinea pig.'

How sad - but is does perhaps explain his predilections for nonsense news stories.

My Grandma told me: " Don't mock the afflicted."

She always gave me good advice and as a result of that advice I ignore Mr 'Guinea-pig-balls' Kat Hak Sung.

Problems like his should not be aired in public - but if they were, nobody would notice.


http://my.expatica.com/c:nl/forum/viewtopi...ae3977d76810341

http://p067.ezboard.com/fdenverpostnewsfrm...tart=61&stop=66


http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/sear...464406d19a11c80

Here is a complete to the word repeat of his rant here on this post;

http://www.totse.com/community/showthread....=1994938&page=3


I think it is time for me to contact my old friends at my former job at Homeland Security, I think this guy needs a good look see by professionals, as he appears to have imploded long ago...

They should be talking to him within just a couple of days like they did to that former owner of this site in Thailand who had his site on servers in HK I believe, when that guy threatened to shot Bush..Two days later, I was told, after my call, they were on him like a fly in shites, Then oddly he sold the site not long afterwards, perhaps a coincidence perhaps...

Recommend banning, if not, we all should put him "on ignore"...

A stage of "hanging on", waiting for the next super 911 for another war.

How can Bush has US troops stay in Iraq? When he has excuse of "maintain security" there. That's why US and Israel intelligence and pentagon manipulate Al Qaida and insurgence and death squad to create a riot over there.

Why Bush wants a surge when "civil war" is created by himself? Remember the time he needs surge was the time when he plans to attack Iran. He needs more troop for the Iran war.

The Capital Hill resolution is only a show to convince American people they are in "democracy". Does it do anything on Bush? No. He still has troops added up in Iraq. They hang on at a "veto". All the players now are waiting for is another super 911 attack. Once that happens, Bush again will be a hero and Americans will lose more money and lives and civil rights to that Inside group.

So many tricks to set up so many bombings. Many bombing aimed at Iraqi police. The heavy casualty of police can irritate a revenge from police to the insurgence (Sunni people). A way to escalate the civil war.

Khadduri's report
<http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KHA505A.html> went like this:

Told him to report to an American military camp

"A few days ago, an American manned check point confiscated the driver license of a driver and told him to report to an American military camp near Baghdad airport for interrogation and in order to retrieve his license.

The next day, the driver did visit the camp and he was allowed in the camp with his car.

He was admitted to a room for an interrogation that lasted half an hour.
At the end of the session, the American interrogator told him:
'OK, there is nothing against you, but you do know that Iraq is now sovereign and is in charge of its own affairs.

Hence, we have forwarded your papers and license to al-Kadhimia police station for processing.

Therefore, go there with this clearance to reclaim your license.
At the police station, ask for Lt. Hussain Mohammed, who is waiting for you now.

Go there now quickly, before he leaves his shift work".

The driver did leave in a hurry, but was soon alarmed with a feeling that his car was driving as if carrying a heavy load, and he also became suspicious of a low flying helicopter that kept hovering overhead, as if trailing him.

He stopped the car and inspected it carefully.

He found nearly 100 kilograms of explosives hidden in the back seat and along the two back doors.

The only feasible explanation for this incident is that the car was indeed booby trapped by the Americans and intended for the al-Khadimiya Shiite district of Baghdad.

The helicopter was monitoring his movement and witnessing the anticipated "hideous attack by foreign elements".

(http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KHA505A.html )

So in the name of "civil war", US and Israel can carry out a holocaust in Iraq. To eliminate the resistence and elite of Iraq.

Quote, "Mossad murdered 530 Iraqi scientists

5/9/2006 1:30:00 PM GMT

Numerous reports for many months have stated that with collaboration from American occupation forces, Israel’s espionage apparatus, Mossad, slaughtered at least 530 Iraqi scientists and academic professors.
Persistent Israeli hit squads against Iraqi scientists had been active in Iraq since April 2003, but the latest chapter was uncovered on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 by the Palestine Information Center which, citing a report compiled by the United States Department of State and intended for the American President, stated that Israeli and foreign agents sent by Mossad, in cooperation with United States, to Iraq, killed at least 350 Iraqi scientists and more than 200 university professors and academic personalities .

According to the report, which was referred to the U.S. president George W. Bush, Mossad agents had been operating in Iraq with the aim of liquidating Iraqi nuclear and biology scientists, among other scientists, and prominent university professors.

That was after the U.S. failed to persuade those scientists to cooperate with or work for it.
"Israeli commandos had been operating on Iraqi territory for more than a year, the focus of their activities being the assassination of Iraqi scientists and intellectuals. The Zionists resorted to the large-scale assassination campaign after the failure of American efforts that started immediately after the American occupation of Iraq, aimed at attracting a number of Iraqi scientists to cooperate and go to work in the United States,” The Palestine Information Center quoted the report as saying.
"Some Iraqi scientists were forced to work in American research centers; however, the majority of them refused to cooperate in certain fields and fled the U.S. to other countries", it further stated.
The Pentagon agreed with the suggestion of Mossad, which believed that the best way to get rid of those scientists was to "physically eliminate them".

The American security service provided Israel with complete biographies on the Iraqi scientists and academics to facilitate killing them, the report said, adding that the Mossad campaign targeting Iraqi scientists is still underway.

http://www.aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=11311

Someone doubts on the man who travel the world with incurable TB. My comment on this issue is:
After six years experience with Bush, you still don't know this is another intimidation of the government?

Anti-bio TB = SARS = Bird Flu = incurable disease = death.

When Bush will start another war in Mid-east, to deal with those who will oppose him there will be a bio-war. Either you are in domestic or a foreigner, they can send a patient (in the name) to where you live to spread the disease (For TB case).(For Bird Flu case, they spread it in the name of migrate birds.) Bird Flu is too old to intrigue your nerve, so they let out a new one: incurable TB.

All the virus, I think, came out from pentagon's bio war laboratory. Once the Iran war started, (or Lebanon or Syria), you prepare for a qarantine from government in the name of some incurable disease.

This case is just a prelude.

Lieberman: U.S. Should Weigh Iran Attack

The Associated Press
June 10, 2007

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Joseph Lieberman said Sunday the United States should consider a military strike against Iran because of Tehran's involvement in Iraq.

"I think we've got to be prepared to take aggressive military action against the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq," Lieberman said. "And to me, that would include a strike over the border into Iran, where we have good evidence that they have a base at which they are training these people coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers."
."

To me Lieberman wants more American soldiers to fight and die for the security of Israel. That's why he could be selected to be senator even his Demo constituents abandoned him.

Israel controls US intelligence through DOJ. They select politicians by rigged election. Thus hijacked the US.

In 2005, so said Al Qaida bombed the Shiite shrine in Samarra which provoked the conflict between Sunni and Shiite. This month, the remnant of the shrine was bombed again. This time Iraqis see more clearly when they start to realize the true face of the US.
Quote, "Iraqis Accuse U.S. Of Bombing Shrine -
thebulletin <http://I.webring.com/profile?y=thebulletin>reply </forum?forum=winwithoutwarweb;submitforummsg;title=Re+%28571%29%3A+Iraqis+Accuse+U%2ES%2E+Of+Bombing+Shrine>
Both Sunni and Shias Iraqis have accused the U.S. of being behind the bombing the al-Askari shrine in Samarra, one of the holiest Shia religious sites, in order to further incite sectarian violence between the two rival Islamic groups and provide a justification for the American surge.

Sunni Muslim leaders belonging to the Association of Muslim Scholars of Iraq have questioned how terrorists could get access to the site which has been heavily guarded by about 60 Federal Protection Service forces and 25 local Iraqi police and closed to the public since it was attacked last year in a bombing which many also believed to be the work of US forces.

Steve Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Full article - http://prisonplanet .com/articles/ june2007/ 130607Shrine. htm
http://s.webring.com/forum?forum=winwithoutwarweb;did=571

Fake democracy

It looks like a system of democracy, it is only a covert totalitarian under the cover of "freedom".

Both parties work for one master: the Inside group. When people get angry with one party then the Inside Group let the other party go to perform on the stage so people thought there is a change and relaxed then.

But when the issue relates to the interest of the Inside group, whichever the party is, they would vote for the interest of the Inside Group not for the people. Iraq war is an unjust war, Demo joined GOP passed the Iraq war Authorization Bill. Now though Demo knew it's against people's will, they still released the funds too for another war - Iran war.

We saw in May, the House suddenly ended a confrontation with Bush administration, released the Iraq military fund. Bush got what he needed for Iran war. The expense for Iraq operation is about 56 billion each year. This time Bush got more than 100 billion, almost double than ordinary expense. What is extra money for? It's for Iran war.

You see, Demo not only released military fund, they also covertly approved for another war. The only person who doesn't know is the public.

Of course, they always have an excuse. This time it is: support our troops.

You can oppose Bush's policy. It is democracy. But you must support our troops. It is patriot. Anyway the troops are under Bush's command. So support our troops is actually support Bush. It is tricky.
Who played as a dummy in this game?

Al Qaida get stronger. The news says.
What has Al Qaida done?

1. So said 911 attack. It was used to justify Bush's war on Afghan and Iraq.

2. Then "run cave to cave". It was used to glorify Bush's victory.

3. Bombing Shiite shrine in Samarra. Bombing innocent Iraqi civilians to provoke civil war between Sunni and Shiite. It was used to justify Bush's surge policy. The increased US troops in Iraq is for what? Iran war.

Now don't you see whom does Al Qaida work for?

When they say Al Qaida is stronger, add to Chertoff's gut feeling of terror attack, plus a double reward on Bin Laden's head. These are all psychological operations. Beware of another super "911" attack. Bush will have another Mid-east war justified by false flag "Al Qaida attack on US".

Psychological Operation

When Bush needed war in Mid-east, he activated 911 attack, in the name of Al Qaida. We saw the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.

When Bush needs more troops for war on Iran, he did it by surge, in the name to fight Al Qaida in Iraq. This is why Al Qaida bombed Shiite shrine in Sammara and bombing Iraqi civilians in the market: to provoke a civil war in Iraq so Bush can have an excuse to surge.

The troop is ready, but he still needs an excuse to start the war. Beware of another super 911. This time it is likely a nuclear bombing, he'll take the advantage of "shock and awe" to start another war.

That's why you have Chertoff's gut feeling, double reward of Bin Laden's head, new Bin Laden's tape, London's bomb case, all are psychological operation for the coming false flag terror attack. It's that simple.

Cheney Determined To Strike In US With WMD This Summer: Only Impeachment, Removal or General Strike Can Stop Him

http://www.911truth.org/article_for_printi...070724182855127

By Webster G. Tarpley
7-21-7

"The greatest threat now is 'a 9/11' occurring with a group of terrorists armed not with airline tickets and box cutters, but with a nuclear weapon in the middle of one of our own cities."
-- Dick Cheney on Face the Nation, CBS, April 15, 2007

A few days ago, a group of lawyers from western Massachusetts met with the local congressman, Democrat John Olver. Their request was that Olver take part in the urgent effort to impeach Bush and Cheney. Olver responded by saying that he had no intention of doing anything to support impeachment. He went further, offering the information that the United States would soon attack Iran, and that these hostilities would be followed by the imposition of a martial law regime here.

According to reports in the British press, the Cheney war party has gained the upper hand in the secret councils of the Bush White House, pushing aside the purported hesitations of Miss Rice, Secretary Gates, and the NATO allies to chart a direct course towards war with Iran:

'The balance in the internal White House debate over Iran has shifted back in favour of military action before President George Bush leaves office in 18 months, the Guardian has learned. The shift follows an internal review involving the White House, the Pentagon and the state department over the last month. Although the Bush administration is in deep trouble over Iraq, it remains focused on Iran. A well-placed source in Washington said: "Bush is not going to leave office with Iran still in limbo." at a meeting of the White House, Pentagon and state department last month, Mr Cheney expressed frustration at the lack of progress and Mr Bush sided with him. "The balance has tilted. There is cause for concern," the source said this week. "Cheney has limited capital left, but if he wanted to use all his capital on this one issue, he could still have an impact," said Patrick Cronin, the director of studies at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.' ("Cheney pushes Bush to act on Iran; Military solution back in favour as Rice loses out; President 'not prepared to leave conflict unresolved'", Guardian, July 16, 2007.)

Deluded supporters of the Democratic Party may soon have to throw away their pathetic countdown clocks, those self-consoling little devices that remind them of how much time remains until noon on January 20, 2009, the moment when it is thought that Bush will finally leave office. These countdown clocks make no provision for the Cheney doctrine, which calls for a new super 9/11 with weapons of mass destruction in the US, to be used as the pretext for a nuclear attack on Iran and for martial law at home. Those who think the Republicans cannot hold the White House in 2008 have forgotten that neocons always prefer a coup d'etat to an election. As Cheney told Bob Schieffer of CBS's Face the Nation on April 15, 2007:

'The greatest threat now is "a 9/11 occurring with a group of terrorists armed not with airline tickets and box cutters, but with a nuclear weapon in the middle of one of our own cities."'

Pelosi and Reid need to toss out their fatuous countdown clocks, and get out their impeachment stopwatches fast.

Much as I have no faith whatsoever in these conspiracy theories regarding coups and secret "terror plots".. I do worry about the administration's disposition with regards to Iran. And even I find myself conflicted over it.

As a responsible American citizen, I have to hope that George Bush does not decide to attack Iran.

But I already predicted that Bush would attack Iran.. and I do hate to be wrong..

Jules, you can do as you wish, but you'll discover that kathaksung is a very neurotic , paranoid person. He seldom responds, just uses this site to posts his internal thoughts.

Haha. Yeah. I noticed that after I followed the rest of his posts yesterday..