Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: bushisacoward is...a...coward.
Political Topics And Discussion > All Things Political > Iraq, Afghanistan & War On Terror
KenBean
I asked the twit where and when he wanted to meet and I have no reply. I had hoped for a private e-mail to discuss like adults...no reply.

Now do you folks understand why I detest the little twit cowards who hide behind their computer and an alias, and spew such filth about guys who are honestly trying to do their jobs...in public under their real names?

Gosh, I hope this little twit has influenced your thinking..... laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
Bean
LooseCannon
Which twit from this board are you referring to? popcorn.gif
KenBean
Well duh! read the topic title. b-u-s-h-i-s-a-c-o-w-a-r-d of course....in this particular instance of course laugh.gif

There are some other twits here, but this particular ignorant twit just pithes me off. Our President is a pilot.
I'm a pilot. Every time I go wheels up and hold my own life in my hands, as well as the lives of my passengers, a lot of thoughts flicker through my mind. Mainly centered around a prayer: (please let me get these folks where they need to be safely.)

Our President flew "Thuds". The nick-name came from their unfortunate habit of quitting flying for no apparent reason...and going "THUD" into the side of a hill.

Cowards don't strap on a high performance jet fighter......for any reason. Our President did...over an extended period of time...until they finally mothballed that man-killer jet.

When some limp-wristed wimp titles himself as this spineless twerp has, it simply makes a mockery of the people who allow such meaningless little twits to exist in a world free enough for their stupidity.

hmmm, maybe that was too complex. Let me be more succinct: The next time you fly to see gramma, would you like this twit at the controls?
Best regards
Bean
MrLeft
Better to have a twit at the controls than an arrogant twit like you.
KenBean
HAH laugh.gif You must not be able to afford to fly...or any reason to do so.

I am 61 and have been piloting all my adult life. There are bold pilots and old pilots...but there are no old-bold pilots. (arrogance won't let one grow old.)
Bean
MrLeft
QUOTE (KenBean @ Feb 1 2007, 01:57 PM) *
HAH laugh.gif You must not be able to afford to fly...or any reason to do so.

I am 61 and have been piloting all my adult life. There are bold pilots and old pilots...but there are no old-bold pilots. (arrogance won't let one grow old.)
Bean


I didn't know old codgers like you are allowed to fly kites. biggrin.gif

Must have hit a nerve, eh, Kennyboy?. Tell you what though. I happen to have two DD214s that both say "Honorable" on them. One of them is from the Air Force that you seem desperately want to brag but never have the cajones to tell us about it.

So please tell us...what type of planes do you fly?? popcorn.gif
ustrader
QUOTE (MrLeft @ Feb 2 2007, 06:24 AM) *
I didn't know old codgers like you are allowed to fly kites. biggrin.gif

Must have hit a nerve, eh, Kennyboy?. Tell you what though. I happen to have two DD214s that both say "Honorable" on them. One of them is from the Air Force that you seem desperately want to brag but never have the cajones to tell us about it.

So please tell us...what type of planes do you fly?? popcorn.gif



The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 (the Act), signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 20, 2006,[1]

The purpose of the Act is to strengthen the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 704 by broadening its scope and strengthening penalties. Specific new provisions in the Act include: granting more authority to Federal law enforcement officers, extending scope beyond the Medal of Honor, broadening the law to cover false claims whereas previously an overt act had to be committed, covering mailing and shipping of medals, and protecting the reputation and meaning of military heroism medals. Now to include both verbal and written claims of entitlement, in addition to the wearing, trading, buying and or selling unearned medals or claims of valor..[3][5]

There are perhaps two maybe three reasons a person would need or be required to have two DD214's, WHAT IS YOURS GOOD SIR?
KenBean
Sir, if you served in uniform...thank you sincerely for your service. I hit the lottery (draft), before my orders to report were cut to report.
...sooo, idiot me went directly into CB (Civilian Builder) work...but at least in management smile.gif

...often we went in before the service guys got there.

I currently drive a Bellanca Super Turbo-Viking.
Bean
MrLeft
QUOTE (ustrader @ Feb 1 2007, 05:54 PM) *
The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 (the Act), signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 20, 2006,[1]

The purpose of the Act is to strengthen the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 704 by broadening its scope and strengthening penalties. Specific new provisions in the Act include: granting more authority to Federal law enforcement officers, extending scope beyond the Medal of Honor, broadening the law to cover false claims whereas previously an overt act had to be committed, covering mailing and shipping of medals, and protecting the reputation and meaning of military heroism medals. Now to include both verbal and written claims of entitlement, in addition to the wearing, trading, buying and or selling unearned medals or claims of valor..[3][5]

There are perhaps two maybe three reasons a person would need or be required to have two DD214's, WHAT IS YOURS GOOD SIR?


Oh, that's simple. One for the Air Force, and one for the Army. I served twice. And that would be "what ARE yours good for", sir. You got a reason for digging up this question, sir?
ustrader
QUOTE (MrLeft @ Feb 3 2007, 04:51 AM) *
Oh, that's simple. One for the Air Force, and one for the Army. I served twice. And that would be "what ARE yours good for", sir. You got a reason for digging up this question, sir?


I see, from far better to far worst but service never the less.

Then, since, perhaps to the VVAW? Or at least away from the America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM, honor, duty and country crowd perhaps? ohmy.gif blink.gif unsure.gif

First off, knowledge is empowerment.

Second, by your response you perhaps have dyslexia. I DID NOT say “what ARE yours good FOR, sir.” I ask instead, “what is yours, Good Sir?

Third, having noted the tenure of discourse in this thread, I reasoned an obvious purpose for digging up this question.

I used the new paradigm technique of Guerrilla Marketing. A premise, in message, that prompts, in this example, all men are indeed born with a nose and ten fingers given to them as senses, to be used is intended.

Thus, in ones other senses is the ability to differentiate disagreement as NOT mutually inclusive in having a demeanor of disagreeability in addition to ones senses of disagreement.

QUOTE
An allegory is not meant to be taken literally. There is a great lack of comprehension on the part of some readers. -Naguib Mahfouz
Bushisacoward
OMG my very own thread, Thanks Bean

Checked my mail nothing there?
ustrader
QUOTE (Bushisacoward @ Feb 5 2007, 02:54 AM) *
OMG my very own thread, Thanks Bean

Checked my mail nothing there?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.