That reads like something John McCain would say. Fortunately, Arizonans know him all too well as a jerk and an arrogant fraud from the Keating Five and Savings & Loan scandals. He will not carry Arizona. You two have a lot in common. He too, is an ignorant sucker for Bush's lies and corruption.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Potential_Mc...Obama_0806.html

Most of what a good executive does is to teach others. But your own knowledge and abilities are so limited that you have to depend on others to do your thinking, an obvious indication of an authoritarian-submissive personality that is easily suckered by self-serving demagogs like the idiot George W. Bush and his gang of gestapo thugs. I wouldn't want a fool like you trying to jump start my car. Red for positive and black for negative is standard operating procedure, and not just for volt/ohm meters.

You're not too familiar with the role of executives are you? "Most of what a good executive does" is to surround himself with the best qualified people he can find, thus not having to worry about teaching others.

Oh, executives don't jump start their own cars, much less the car of someone as menial as yourself.

"It's hard to walk away from your party's nominee, but you have to put your country first."

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Republicans_...h_for_0812.html

http://www.republicansforObama.org/?q=homepage

Are all of you nutz religiously preoccupied?

It seems that each of you doomsayers have biblical quotes as a part of your signatures. You make a mockery of God's Word while using hate-filled links.

What a contradiction.

There very little religion, and none of the crazy, ignorant, new testament fundamentalist religion in the predictions of a Hebrew prophet of the 7th Century BC.

I don't see any gloom and doom. I am more optimistic than ever because Obama is probably going to be the next President. And even in the improbable event Obama is not elected, there is no way McCain could be as bad as the criminal scum, the incompetent, arrogant, lying ba$tards now in the White House.

It's going to take at least forty years to recover from the disasters of the fraudulent Bush administration. You chicken ###### chicken hawks and banana Republicans with your Republican party spin and slime machine will, no doubt, fault Obama if he can't clean up Bush's mess in four years.

What Nahum has to say about Obama is a little unclear.

I am a bible scholar and know that you are out of your tree to assume that Nahum had anything to say about today. The Old Testament was a history of God's people up until the coming of Christ, the rules therein were to be observed by the Jews until Christ's death (Christ himself was an observing Jew), at which time the veil of the temple of rent from top to bottom in the Holy of Holies. This indicated that the need for the temple, laws, etc. were done with. Christ himself said, "It is finished" before he died.

Nahum, in particular, in the scripture you quote was referring to the complete destruction of Ninevah: The Book of Nahum prophesies the imminent demise of the Neo-Assyrian Empire and destruction of Nineveh its capital. Although it is impossible to be precise about the exact date of composition of the book, the terminus a quo may be set at 663 BC, while the terminus ad quem appears to be 612 BC. The fall of Thebes in 663 BC is viewed as a recent past event (3:8-10), while the fall of Nineveh in 612 BC and the final end of the Empire in 609 BC are both depicted as future events. See here.

I can see that you do not know your bible history or bible knowledge any better than you know your politics.

Thankfully, I got away from the bible belt state of Tennessee early in my life. I'll never again have to live in the middle of so much ignorance, bigotry and racism. I have no particular interest in any religion or in the bible.

Strange, considering your signature and this statement: There very little religion, and none of the crazy, ignorant, new testament fundamentalist religion in the predictions of a Hebrew prophet of the 7th Century BC.

Which way are you going to have it?

I'm not a religious person but I have one thing in common with many people of faith. As a practical matter, I believe in the ten commandments, so I have no use for crooks and liars like George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. They are the most reviled and detested public figures in recent world history, they are the lowest of all possible criminal scum and they belong in prison.

"The Bush fascist family does not believe it is subject to the laws of the land. ...apparantly God spoke to George and George considered himself and all his crooked friends above all man made laws. Too bad they forgot God's laws to help the sick, feed the hungry and shelter the poor. Jesus was VERY SPECIFIC in what it would take to get into heaven and this hypocrit administration will not be there..."

http://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=64621

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/8/13/the_...f_the_world_ron

And, the reason for the use of prophecy on your signature in which you do not believe (it's not a part of the 10 commandments )is ..............


(Personally, I consider the Clinton's the most reviled and detested among politicians and the most criminal, which actions they continue to display. Bill narrowly escaped having his impeachment completed, thanks to the Demigod atheist Jew George Soros and his MoveOn.Org who are continuing to mess with our Republic.)

I am not a fan of either of the Clintons, but there is no way that sexual misconduct can be a greater crime than those of Bush and Cheney, who have caused a world of death and misery for thousands of Americans, Iraqis and others by knowingly using a package of lies for the totally self serving purpose of taking this nation into a war for profit.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/

It wasn't the sex act, it was his lying under oath.

Bush and Cheney stopped a madman who was murdering approximately 5,000 of his own people per month. You do the figures.

Didn't answer my question...........why do you use something in your signature that you don't believe in? A logical person such as yourself is can answer that question, can't you?

And, how do you feel about Soros? And, his meddling in our democratic processes?

Saddam was bad, but he was no worse than a half dozen other brutal dictators around the world.

If telling lies, particularly the felony of lying to the US Congress is the more compelling issue, George Bush is the one that should be impeached.

http://www.bushwatch.com/bushlies.htm

http://www.bushflash.com/right.html

The issue was "lying under oath," not someone's opinion against another's opinion. You're having to twist the two issues to make them fit your view.

And, my answer regarding Saddam was related to your statement about Bush and Cheney causing thousands of deaths. I was comparing the deaths (your statement about Bush and Cheney, and Saddam's record...........less deaths were caused by freeing Afghanistan than what Saddam would have caused by staying in power), not Saddam's record with other dictators. You're mixing apples and oranges in order to support your views, again.

And, you've dodged two of my questions.

Bush has already been impeached in the court of public opinion, and his lies are well documented, not a matter of opinion.

More Altered reality Pancake fantasies of HOPE for fallacy, from the NO pancake manboy...

41% Say Bush Worst President Ever; 50% Disagree

Forty-one percent (41%) of Americans say George W. Bush will go down in history as the worst U.S. President ever, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.

But 50% of Americans disagree, despite Bush's record low poll numbers on his job performance.
Given the partisan emotions running high in the Bush years and the ongoing presidential campaign, it’s not surprising to find that the results are heavily weighted by the respondents’ political affiliations. For example, only 9% of Republicans rate Bush the worst president ever compared to 69% of Democrats.

By contrast, 85% of Republicans say Bush is not the worst, but only 21% of Democrats agree.

Over a third (37%) of unaffiliated voters rank him as the worst, but 52% of unaffiliateds do not.

During the month of July, 33% of adults nationwide say they approved of the way that Bush is performing his job -- up one point from the all-time low reached in June.

While 61% of Americans overall say Bush has been bad for the Republican Party, only 28% of Republicans themselves agree. On the other hand, 81% of Democrats – and 68% of unaffiliated voters -- rate the president as bad for the GOP.

Similarly, while 41% rate Bush as very conservative, only 24% of self-designated conservatives feel that way, compared to 64% of liberals and 42% of moderates. In fact, nearly one-quarter of conservatives (24%) rate Bush moderate to very liberal.

Just over half of Americans (51%) say Bush has been bad for the conservative movement, a view shared by 37% of conservatives and 60% of both moderates and liberals.

When asked what Bush will be remembered for most, most Americans (63%) say the war in Iraq, followed by his response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks (23%), his handling of the economy (6%) and his nominations to the Supreme Court (2%).

Again, party affiliation speaks volumes. While 73% of Democrats say Bush will be most remembered for the war in Iraq, only 46% of Republicans agree. Thirty-eight percent (38%) of GOP voters think the president will be best remembered for his response to 9/11, a view shared by only 12% of Democrats. Among unaffiliated voters, 66% say the war in Iraq and 22% say the response to 9/11.

Men are slightly more favorable to the president than women. Fifty-two percent (52%) of men say Bush is not the worst president ever, and 48% of women (+ manboys) agree. But nearly as many women (43%) say he is the worst, a view shared by only 40% of men.

African-Americans are nearly twice as critical as whites. Sixty percent (60%) of blacks rank Bush as the worst president in U.S. history, but only 36% of whites agree. While just 21% of blacks say Bush is not the worst, over half (55%) of whites feel that way.

Marriage is a factor, too. The majority of married Americans (55%) do not believe Bush is the worst president ever, but 51% of unmarried respondents do. ( Obvioulsy we know Roadkill could never be married hey )

How will this all play out in the election? Sixty-nine percent (69%) of likely Obama voters and seven percent of potential McCain voters rank Bush as the worst. But 86% of likely McCain voters and 20% of potential Obama voters say no way.


158 Days, 09 Hours, 46 Minutes, 29 Seconds.




THAT IS ALL!!

No, he hasn't and they are aren't .

And, you are still dodging two of my questions.

Can't you talk without your usual well beaten path of Bush bashing?

Don't tell me that it's useless talking to you.

Come on, Roady. Give us your spin on Soros.

This topic is about Obama v. McCain, not about Soros or the Clintons. The spin is that you righties like to change the subject to avoid a real issue.

Soros hasn't done anything unlawful that I'm aware of and the Clintons are becoming more and more irrelevant.

What's interesting and somewhat revealing is that in all of the irrational, racist Obama bashing, there's little support and no real enthusiasm for McCain. Most of the garbage that's coming from the GOP spin/slime machine and its mindless followers is helping Obama, because it is so loaded with distortions, falsehoods and extremism that no thinking person could believe it.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/081208a.html

Then, you are more ignorant than I thought.

Waste of time.

Of course, you'd have to quit using his and his cronies' links if you admitted what he is doing.

Dupe. How does it feel to have someone else live in your head and do your thinking for you?

(It's not about Bush, either. But, since this thread is about Obama and McCain, I guess you'll stay solely on the topic .........about Obama and McCain? )

The man who broke the Bank of England

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/229012.stm

In 1997, during the Asian financial crisis, then Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir bin Mohamad accused Soros of using the wealth under his control to punish ASEAN for welcoming Myanmar as a member. Later, he called Soros a moron.[14] Thai nationals have called Soros "an economic war criminal[15]" who "sucks the blood from the people".[16]



France's highest court affirms George Soros' conviction for insider trading.

International Law Update, July, 2006

After almost two decades of litigation, the French Cour de Cassation affirmed the conviction of 75-year-old American billionaire, George Soros, [color-red]for insider trading in 95,000 shares of Societe Generale (SG) bank during 1988. The basic charge is that Mr. Soros unlawfully traded in SG shares after learning of a planned corporate raid on the bank.

French authorities, however, have yet to decide what fine Mr. Soros should pay, a matter remanded to the intermediate Court of Appeal.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb64...07/ai_n25789425

Soros-linked group hit with huge fine

By: Kenneth P. Vogel
Aug 29, 2007

The Federal Election Commission has fined one of the last cycle’s biggest liberal political action committees $775,000 for using unregulated soft money to boost John Kerry and other Democratic candidates during the 2004 elections.

America Coming Together (ACT) raised $137 million for its get-out-the-vote effort in 2004, but the FEC found most of that cash came through contributions that violated federal limits.

The group’s big donors included George Soros, Progressive Corp. chairman Peter Lewis and the Service Employees International.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0807/5555.html

Now in 2007, as legally reported Ekection Commission the same shame socialist are the big money claimed to be owed and control Nazi Bush Republicans… HMM! Roadkill another example over many years now, where you have proven time an time again to be letting others indoctrinate your intelligence proving how uninformed that indoctrinated Intelligence is.

527's

Top Individual Contributors to 527 Committees, 2008 Election Cycle



Steven Bing Los Angeles, CA $4,850,000
Shangrila Entertainment -The Fund for America

George Soros New York, NY $4,650,000
Receipent-Soros Fund Management - The Fund for America

Sheldon Adelson Las Vegas, NV $3,597,632
Las Vegas Sands Corp American Solutions Winning the Future

John R Hunting Grand Rapids, MI $1,243,000
Philanthropist League of Conservation Voters

Fred Godley Cornelius, NC $1,100,000
Real Estate Developer American Solutions Winning the Future

Donald Sussman St. Thomas, VI $1,000,000
Trust Asset Management The Fund for America

Lee Fikes Dallas, TX $1,000,000
Bonanza Oil The Fund for America

Alida R Messinger New York, NY $883,000
Alida Messinger Charitable Lead Trust
League of Conservation Voters

Peter B Lewis Mayfield Village, OH $850,000
Progressive Insurance Young Democrats of America

Robert Bingham Del Mar, CA $817,452
Investor Unity 08

Carl H Lindner Cincinnati, OH $660,000
American Financial Group American Solutions Winning the Future

Gerald & Lilo Leeds family Great Neck, NY $623,000
Hartman Management Group League of Education Voters of America

Fred Eychaner Chicago, IL $675,000
Newsweb Corp EMILY's List Non-Federal

Jon Stryker Kalamazoo, MI $604,054
Jon Stryker/Jon Stryker Architecture Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund

Virginia James Lawrenceville, NJ $550,000
Club for Growth.net

Bob Perry Houston, TX $550,000
Perry Homes Club for Growth.net

Francine Goldstein Westport, CT $500,000
Advocate & Marketing Consultant Planned Parenthood Votes

Lynde B Uihlein Milwaukee, WI $500,000
Time Out Enterprises League of Conservation Voters

Gladys G Cofrin Gainesville, FL $495,000
Philanthropist EMILY's List Non-Federal

John Templeton Bryn Mawr, PA $457,900
Templeton Foundation

S Daniel Abraham West Palm Beach, FL $455,000
Slim Fast Foods The Fund for America

David Maltz Cleveland, OH $420,000
Maltz Family Foundation Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund

Jackson T Stephens Jr Little Rock, AR $350,000
Eoe Inc Club for Growth.net

Quinn Delaney & Wayne Jordan Family Oakland, CA $309,000
Akonadi Foundation EMILY's List Non-Federal

Pat Stryker Ft Collins, CO $300,000
Bohemian Companies EMILY's List Non-Federal

Sara Morgan Houston, TX $300,000
Retired EMILY's List Non-Federal

David Woods Montgomery, AL $250,000
Woods Communication David Woods for Congress

Susie Tompkins Buell San Francisco, CA $250,000
Retired EMILY's List Non-Federal

Richard Gilder New York, NY $250,000
Gilder, Gagnon et al Club for Growth.net

Jonathan Allen Soros New York, NY $250,000

Soros Fund Management The Fund for America

http://www.opensecrets.org/527s/527cmtes.php?level=C

B]The Soros Threat To Democracy[/b]

How many people, for instance, know that James Hansen, a man billed as a lonely "NASA whistleblower" standing up to the mighty U.S. government, was really funded by Soros' Open Society Institute , which gave him "legal and media advice"?

That's right, Hansen was packaged for the media by Soros' flagship "philanthropy," by as much as $720,000, most likely under the OSI's "politicization of science" program.

Didn't the mainstream media report that 2006's vast immigration rallies across the country began as a spontaneous uprising of 2 million angry Mexican-flag waving illegal immigrants demanding U.S. citizenship in Los Angeles, egged on only by a local Spanish-language radio announcer?

Turns out that wasn't what happened, either. Soros' OSI had money-muscle there, too, through its $17 million Justice Fund. The fund lists 19 projects in 2006. One was vaguely described involvement in the immigration rallies. Another project funded illegal immigrant activist groups for subsequent court cases

http://www.investors.com/editorial/editori...275526219598836

Soro’s Open Society Institute gave $20,000 in September 2002 to the Defense Committee of Lynne Stewart, the lawyer who has defended alleged terrorists in court and was sentenced to 2⅓ years in prison for "providing material support for a terrorist conspiracy" via a press conference for a client
Soros funded Moveon .org which now also includes the pseudo independent Moveon Media Matters originally to help stop Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Since records indicate he has provide as much as 80 million via is associations and directly.

In April 2008, Soros hosted an event in his apartment that had guests such as David Brock of the self-described progressive watchdog group Media Matters and liberal commentator Paul Begala. Brock described that the plan intends to raise $40 million to run political advertisements against the presumptive Republican nominee, Senator John McCain, through a group called The Fund for America and Progressive Media, whose key backer, according to politico.com, is Soros. [38]

Look at the top 527 donors and you can see most if not all of those who attended this meeting.

That is all!!

What's interesting and somewhat revealing is that in all of the irrational, racist Obama bashing, there's little support and no real enthusiasm for McCain. Most of the garbage that's coming from the GOP spin/slime machine and its mindless followers is helping Obama, because it is so loaded with distortions, falsehoods and extremism that no thinking person could believe it.

http://www.motherjones.com/riff_blog/archi...mccain_eve.html

http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archiv...cain_has_2.html

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/#95122

And, you are quoting motherjones and alternet as your source of info?

How's about going to the conservative websites and do your own research? THAT'S what would be interesting. Not your second-hand (unbiased--hahahahahhaaaaa) info.

Are you a Soros fan as well? Now, that's another unbiased source of information. Yep, sure is. (Hint: this is another example of irony. You have problems identifying such.)

http://www.republicansforobama.org/?q=node/1513

http://www.republicansforobama.org/?q=node/1491

http://www.republicansforhumility.com/#armey

http://www.republicansforhumility.com/milrep.html

http://ivaw.org/faq

Oh Roadster, your such a hypocrite. I beleive when I said Obama was runnnig a poor campaign you brought up Bush to make Barrack look better compared to the 'big bad'.

Pan Bogu swieczke, a diablu ogarek
A candle for God, a stump for the devil.

The perfect candidate, one who makes no mistakes, does not exist. Obama is not perfect and neither is his campaign, but Obama has gained far more respect and admiration worldwide. Obama is smarter, brighter, a better speaker and better educated than McCain. Obama's attitude, the honesty and the direction of his campaign are all light years ahead of McCain who is an arrogant and beligerent jerk with a multitude of medical problems including poor memory and foot-in-mouth disease.

You notice, Foy, that he didn't answer your post.........only put out more propoganda. A waste of time to talk to him, which had been my original thoughts several years ago. This guy is a troll, IMHO, who doesn't engage in any conversation in which he has to admit he's been wrong.

THIS ONE WAS ABOUT SOME CONSERVATIVES REJECTING THE PAST 8 YEARS, ACCORDING TO THE AUTHOR, BUT NO MENTION OF REJECTING MCCAIN. ONLY THAT SOME REPUBLICANS DON'T LIKE SOME OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN THE PAST 8 YEARS (WITH A DEMOCRAT CONGRESS THIS LAST FOUR YEARS).
Hey! This was largely posts from Democrats on this site. Doesn't count as REPUBLICANS FOR OBAMA.

BUZZZTTT! THIS ONE IS ABOUT THE 2006 ELECTION...........NOTHING ABOUT OBAMA OR MCCAIN.


THIS ONE IS ABOUT REJECTING BUSH'S POLICIES AND ABOUT THE 2004 ELECTION. NOTHING ABOUT OBAMA AND MCCAIN. ??

AND, THIS ONE IS ABOUT VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR ON TERROR. NOTHING ABOUT OBAMA OR MCCAIN.

Hes an uncommitted poster fortressed up in his web of biased liberal sites, sheltered from the real world but more importantly, facts. I feel so ignored.




Awesome!
I didn't know someone actually looks at his links! I don't have the time, but this is great.

"In order to win, McCain needs a new cold war. Lucky for him Republicans are good at whipping up false international threats."

http://www.alternet.org/story/96624/john_m...nt_at_any_cost/

"McCain's campaign is an irrational mix of patriotic swagger and blindness to reality that's proving scarily successful with uninformed voters."

http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/9...rped_worldview/