Mr.Mousavi,

You have destroyed your personality forever within twenty four hours of election,
You have tried to turn the proud event of election into a disturbance,
You did not win the election, so that you want to shake the whole table,
You now seem to be an enemy of whole iran and system,
you issued inflammatory statements that pushed innocent people towards violence,
you tried to create doubt about whole system,
you tried to divide iranians,
you tried to weaken iranians,
you used election pretext to humiliate iranians,

Now Iranian ambassadors have been called upon in various capitals of the world to ask questions about election.

Is this your gift to iran and Iranian people.
Is this your total value???
An election???
Only an election???

there are complaints about elections in bharat, usa and even in britain,
but no politician ever behaved like you behaved,

is this your moderation? while you have no vigilance no patience,
your behavior shows that you want presidency at any cost, even at the cost of whole nation,
your behavior confirms your confrontational mind,

you talk about peace talk with west and usa,
while you showed no peace, no patience with your own nation, own system,

elections are not fraud,
but you are fraud,
your intention is fraud,
your policy is fraud,
your talks are fraud,

if, you have no mercy towards your own nation,
how can you be meriful with others?

i know, you will create confrontation, step by step,
but believe that, your all efforts will bear no fruit,
your hands of greed and dishonesty will remain empty,

I am very sad about your actions Mr.Mousavi,
you have humiliated iran,
You were my ideal but not now and never,
You have broken various hearts,
You have broken my trust.



amazing thing is:

mr.mousavi is protesting in tehran and asking question that: "where are my votes",
while mr.mousavi has already won in tehran city,
as figures shown below:

Tehran city:
Mirhossein moussavi 2,166,245
Ahmadinejad 1,809,855

Shemiranat:
Mirhossein Moussavi 200,931
Ahmadinejad 102,433

so, does it make any sense that while he...mr.mousavi, has already won in tehran, is asking "where are my votes"

is it logical???
is it even reasonable???

instead, he should go zanjan province or semnan province or etc, for the protest where he has lost by large margins,

what is he doing in tehran?
fulfilling enemy agendas???

here is the full list of results of votes count in provinces, issued by interior ministry:

Ardabil Province
Total votes: 642,005
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 325,911
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 302,825
Mir-Hossein Moussavi won over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the cities of Ardabil with 140,582 to 137,220, Pilehsavar with 13,186 to 12,310, Pars-Abad with 48,521 to 31,453 and Garmi with 24,192 to 20,020.


Bushehr Province
Total votes: 493,989
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 299,357
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 177,268
Mir-Hossein Moussavi won over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the city of Ganaveh with 24,885 to 23,995.


Chaharmahal Bakhtiari Province
Total votes: 495,446
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 359,578
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 106,099

East-Azerbaijan
Total votes: 2,010,340
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 1,131,111
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 837,858
Mir-Hossein Moussavi won over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the city of Shabestar with 39,182 to 37,099.

Fars Province
Total votes: 2,523,300
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 1,758,026
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 706,764

Gilan Province
Total votes: 1,483,258
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 998,573
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 453,806

Golestan Province
Total votes: 869,453
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 515,211
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 325,806
Mir-Hossein Moussavi won over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the cities of Aqqala with 25,144 to 23,303, Bandar Torkaman with 36,794 to 18,577, Kalaleh with 28,740 to 23,894 and Maraveh Tappeh with 14,865 to 5,943.


Hamadan Province
Total votes: 1,019,169
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 765,723
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 218,481

Hormozgan Province
Total votes: 843,024
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 241,988
Mir-Hossein Moussavi won over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the cities of
Bastak with 21,607 to 8,407, Parsian with 11,882 to 6,752, Khamir with 14,943 to 8,263 and Qeshm with 27,884 to 23,020.


Ilam Province
Total votes: 312,667
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 199,654
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 96,826

Isfahan Province
Total votes: 2,637,482
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 1,799,255
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 746,697

Kerman Province
Total votes: 1,505,814
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 1,160,446
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 318,250

Kermanshah Province
Total votes: 983,422
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 573,568
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 374,188
Mir-Hossein Moussavi won over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the cities of Paveh with 12,114 to 8,841, Javanroud with 11,888 to 10,775, Dalaho with 15,104 to 8,384 and Ravansar with 10,662 to 8,544.


Khorasan Razavi Province
Total votes: 3,181,990
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 2,214,801
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 884,570
In the city of Khaf, Moussavi won over Ahmadinejad with 30,835 votes over 28,493.


Khuzestan Province
Total votes: 2,038,845
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 1,303,129
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 552,636


Kohkilouye & Boyerahmad
Total votes: 368,707
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 253,962
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 98,937


Kurdistan Province
Total votes: 610,757
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 315,689
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 261,772
Mir-Hossein Moussavi won over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the cities of Baneh with 23,745 to 16,552, Saqqez with 49,519 to 24,523 and Marivan with 29,902 to 20,404.


Markazi Province
Total votes: 785,961
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 572,988
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 190,349


Mazandaran Province
Total votes: 1,919838
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 1,289,257
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 585,373


North Khorasan Province
Total votes: 464,001
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 341,104
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 113,218

Qazvin Province
Total votes: 692,355
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 498,061
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 177,542

Qom Province
Total votes: 599,040
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 422,457
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 148,467

Semnan Province
Total votes: 383,308
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 295,177
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 77,754

Sistan-Baluchistan Province
Total votes: 982,920
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 450,269
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 507,946
Mir-Hossein Moussavi won over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the cities of Iranshahr with 50,971 to 33,802, Chabahar with 62,564 to 21,185, Khash with 47,762 to 9,945, Zaboli with 14,869 to 5,897, Zahedan with 140,118 to 120,978, Saravan with 47,620 to 13,258, Sibsouran with 18,314 to 7,456, Konarak with 18,467 to 9,089 and Nikshahr with 47,661 to 25909.


South Khorasan Province
Total votes: 383,157
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 285,983
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 90,363


Tehran Province
Total votes: 7,521,540
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 3,819,945
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 3,371,523

In the cities of Tehran and Shemiranat,

Moussavi beat Ahmadinejad:

Tehran city:
Mirhossein moussavi 2,166,245
Ahmadinejad 1,809,855

Shemiranat:
Mirhossein Moussavi 200,931
Ahmadinejad 102,433


West-Azerbaijan Province
Total votes: 1,334,356
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 623,946
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 656,508
Mir-Hossein Moussavi won over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the cities of Oshnavieh with 12,690 to 8,967, Bukan with 35,833 to 16,481, Piranshahr with 24,486 to 11,270, Sardasht with 18,654 to 16,737, Salmas with 47,276 to 43,652, Showt with 13,872 to 11,130, Mako with 28,451 to 13,884; Mahabad with 38,579 to 19,999, Miandoab with 55,739 to 55,575 and Naghadeh with 32,415 to 26,419.


Yazd Province
Total votes: 609,856
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 337,178
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 255,799
Mir-Hossein Moussavi won over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the cities of
Ardakan with 23,675 to 19,389, Sadooq with 11,399 to 10,755 and Yazd with 148,090 to 133,792.

Zanjan Province
Total votes: 585,721
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 444,480
Mir-Hossein Moussavi: 126,561

Jews community in the Islamic Republic of Iran on Thursday in a statement condemned the recent riots in Iran and announced their hatred against them.

the statement said:

"Such a behavior is far from the Iranian dignity and we condemn it,"

"Considering the recent guidelines by the Leader of the Islamic Revolution for establishment of unity and solidarity and avoiding discord among people, we condemn such riots by opportunist persons who try to destroy the public properties and target the tranquility and unity among Iranian people."

You are full of sh!t. No jew supports the pigs that run Iran. The election was a lie. And most Iranians know it. Khamenei is a pig. If he begins to kill the protesters en mass the emotional farsi blood will boil. I look forward to the specticle to come....

Mousavi’s official complaint (that he has sent to concerned authorities in written) has following points:

-First two points, mousavi has communicated, relate to tv debates,

-Mousavi claims that ahmadinejad has used state owned means of transportation to campaign around country,

-Mousavi also claims in his letter that ahmadinejad has access to media,

-Mousavi also complains of shortages of election forms in some places that caused few hours delay,

-Mousavi complains that in some areas casted votes were higher than registered votes but he did not mention such some areas specifically,

-Mousavi also complains that his few monitors were denied access to monitor the elections,

None of his points mentioned in complaint have documentary evidence for any irregularities, although thousands of his monitors monitored the elections. There is no appendix in his two paged complaint except his own previously written 80 letters that he had sent. But none of these letters have any document of evidence of any irregularity.

So, how and why mr.mousavi may call the election as fraudulent based on above mentioned simple claims???

Khamenei delivered an speech in friday prayers in Tehran on 19th june 2009. following are few points of his speech:


“If the difference was 100,000 or 500,000 or 1 million, well, one may say fraud could have happened. But how can one rig 11 million votes?”


“It must be determined at the ballot box what the people want and what they don’t want, not in the streets,”


“the presidential election’s unprecedented turnout of almost 85 percent hit the enemy like a political earthquake and became a cause for a real celebration for the friends of the country.”

“all the 40 million people who turned out for ballot have actually voted for Imam, the Revolution and its martyrs, the four competing presidential candidates belong to the Islamic establishment and therefore they are going to have to pursue their electoral issues within the existing transparent laws and regulations.”


“it is not in the nature of the Islamic System to betray the vote of people and that the electoral procedures of the Islamic System never allow any fraud.”

“difference of opinion was natural, but behind all those different opinions, there was a collective responsibility for preservation of the country and the system.”


“the 40m vote was a national declaration of loyalty to Imam, the Revolution and the Martyrs, by the large turnout, the Islamic System took a fresh breath and the ill wishers of the system were slapped with the true concept of religious democracy.”


"They seek to question the legitimacy of the system through erosion of participation. If they manage to gain the goal, the incurred loss is larger than any other losses,"


“the Islamic System despite the claims of some Zionist bodies is among the healthiest establishments in the world.”

“in the run-up to the elections, the western authorities and media tried to trigger a voter apathy nevertheless they were shocked by a 40m turnout which made them to realize that a new chapter has opened in the issues related to the Islamic Republic of Iran which must be inevitably accepted by them.”


"They then tried to ride the wave of protests following the elections and gradually pushed aside covers from their true face. Some of them showed their enmity with the Islamic System and the British Government proved more wicked than others in this regard,"


"Simultaneously foreign elements triggered a line of destruction, arson, pillage of public wealth and unrest; they have no link to people or supporters of candidates rather they are related to ill wishers of the Iranian nation and mercenaries of western and Zionist spy services,"


“the situation made the enemies to feel greedy so that they thought they could spark a velvet revolution in Iran as they did in some small countries with a few million dollars paid by a Zionist capitalist. The main problem is that the ignorant enemies have yet to know the Iranian nation,"

"The ugliest issue was the expression of sympathy by American authorities for human rights and their claim of tightening of situation against Iranian people. How those who committed such and such crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq and support the bully Zionist regime allow themselves to profess to cherish human rights?"


Ayatollah Khamenei in the same regard reminded the conduct of the Democrat administration of Clinton in the massacre of more than 80 people of the Davidian sect.

"You burned more than 80 women, men and children alive. So how could you understand human rights?"


“the Islamic Republic has hoisted the flag of human rights and defense of the oppressed and that it has no need to take advice from the West in this regard.”

i have been watching bbc, cnn, presstv, and other news networks during last week,
all networks are showing 'exclusive videos' from tehran alongwith 'high definition analysis' by inviting various experts,

amazing thing is:

not any news network has invited any single political expert from any university or else to discuss facts and figures about 'election fraud' labeled by mousavi, why???

why they do not discuss that???
if, there is fraud, why they dont show it through 'exclusive videos' and 'exclusive reports' ???
why???

why christina amanpur of cnn does not show specific documents and other details of fraud in election on her exclusive reports direct from Tehran ???
what actually fraud is ???
what are facts and figures and details of fraud ???

ms. christian amapur! where is your 'detailed analysis' on fraud specifically with facts and figures???
ms.amanpur! you were free to go and visit any polling station through out iran on election day, did you record or notice any piece of fraud then???

why dont you produce it and show it on cnn ???
if, you dont have and you didn’t even notice, then,
isn't it dishonesty to chant 'fraud' 'fraud' like a sixteen year inexperienced school girl, if you dont have any proof ???

isn't it against the basic principles of justice, human rights and journalism ???

ms.amanpur! why didn’t you produce ‘exclusive report’ on Egyptian presidential election direct from cairo ???

ms. Christiana Amanpur! Do you believe that you will face Jesus one day with your all ‘exclusive reports ???

ms. Christiana Amanpur! Do you believe that jesus will also produce another exclusive report about your treatment with truth ???

do you really believe on that or you just play with the name of God and Jesus just like king abdollah or ben laden or Hitler ???

where is your standing ms.christiana amanpur ???
would you like to smile in front of jesus, the same way as you smile on cnn screen ???

please stop a moment and think about it.

Dialogue with a supporter of mousavi:

What are you doing on the street?
-i am protesting,

For what?
-I do not see my vote,

How do you want to see your vote?
-I voted for mousavi and mousavi didn’t win,

Yes! Not only you but millions of Iranians voted for mousavi,
-and mousavi didn’t win, that’s why I call it fraud,

But, how can you call it fraud?
-because, mousavi didn’t win,

My Dear supporter of Mr. Mousavi, there are also people who voted for ahmadinejad, so how can you reject their votes?
-I don’t know, mousavi has won the election,

How mousavi has won the election?
-mousavi has told us,

Have you ever analyzed that how mousavi has claimed such a victory without proof?
-mousavi has proof,

What proof?
-people have voted him in majority,

Is this a proof?
-some reliable sources have told mousavi that he has won the election,

Do you know such reliable sources?
-No,

Why such reliable sources want to keep themselves behind the curtain?
-I don’t know,

Is it good to believe on rumors?
-No,

Have such reliable sources provided Mr.Mousavi with some proofs about their claims of victory?
-No,


Without having any proof, do you believe on any claims?
-Yes…No…but,

My Dear Supporter of Mr.Mousavi, suppose, if Mr.Mousavi got the chair of presidency through threatening and blackmailing tactics, and then ahmadinejad’s supporters go on the street to protest in the same your style, then?
-I don’t know,

Who will suffer in that case? You or mousavi or ahmadinejad or the whole Iranian nation?
-whole Iranian nation,

Do you know this?
-Yes, its quit clear,

Should you keep continue your violent protests?
-absolutely not…but…,

My dear supporter of Mr.Mousavi, mr.mousavi has been ruling the country during 1980 to 1988, so why now the administration will rig the election to keep him out of power?
-because, he talks about change,

My dear, Mr.Mousavi has ruled for 8 years, then Mr.Khatami also has been ruling for 8 years, why then they brought change?
-I don’t know, but this time mr.mousavi says he will bring change,

What is change in your view?
-we need freedom,

What is freedom in your view?
-we are denied certain websites…

So, you have burned down that public bus to the ground costing half a million dollars, just because you do not have access to certain websites?
-Yes…No, but, we have other issues,

What issues?
-we need change. We need our rights,

What are your rights?
-we need the same rights as westerners have,

Do you know that there are some basic differences between westerners and Iranians?
-No, there is no difference,

Yes, there are. For example: 80% westerners drink wine, while 80% Iranians do not. For example: 80% westerners are not religious, while 80% Iranians are. Etc…?
-Yes, that’s true,

So, how and why this kind of freedom can you install in iran?
-we will do our best under the leadership of mousavi,

Suppose, even if, you successfully removed the whole current system and installed a western type govt, then how long can you sustain with such system??? People are not so simple now. The revolution has contributed a high level of awareness in people. Now, more than 85% people are literate. They can read and analyze things, so how long can you sustain that newly installed system?
-really, I don’t know,

By doing such thing, aren’t you inviting another revolution just at the end of current decade …and this time…the most toughest one???
-oh, I don’t know,

You should know this Mr. Supporter of Mousavi. You are clear-cut at the path of destruction of the whole iran. How many percentage of Iranians live in western countries and usa?
-a very large quantity,

No, you are wrong, only less than 2% Iranians live in western countries and usa, so how these people can change more than 98% of Iranians? How can they?
-Mousavi has plans,

You also have some brain. Why don’t you think about it? Do you want to repeat same old game. The king tried to enforce western style in iran, so he faced a fatal opposition and ultimately destroyed himself along with his kingdom. Do you want Mr.Mousavi repeat those actions this time under the slogan of democracy and freedom? Is it even possible?
-I really don’t know…

My dear, the simple thing is: you can never change more than 80% people of iran, then why you insist a western style minority rule over majority of Iranians? Why you don’t respect the majority of people of iran? Isn’t it very simple for you to understand that if you tried to impose your minority thoughts over majority, then there will definitely be a reaction and that will lead the whole country into bloodshed and chaos as you see in Pakistan, Afghanistan, iraq, Mogadishu and etc… do you like such ugly situation for your own motherland Iran?
-No…Never,

My dear, today iran is the most peaceful country in the whole middle east and Africa, isn’t it a fact?
-Yes, there is no doubt about it,

So, where your protests may lead the whole iran?
-Yes, I understand you now. It seems very dangerous path,

Isn’t it better to keep patience, peace and vigilance and follow the law, atleast, until iran is surrounded by foreign forces. Nations never die. You can re-start your protests for change when iran is safe from all borders. You can do it later. Isn’t highly dangerous to destabilize the whole country. You know? Destabilization is the first condition of slavery and invasion as we witnessed in Afghanistan and iraq, didn’t we?
-you are right. I see sincerity in your advise,

Oh supporter of mousavi, please go and try to convince mousavi and beg him to not endanger the future and dignity of peaceful land of iran and peaceful nation of iran.

Islamic Republic has blooded the flag of human rights and oppressed the oppressed in the name of Dajjal False prophets who slither from beneath the foot of Honest and faithful Muslims.

Oh supporter of Mousavi, we fear you much, so please convince Mousavi and beg him, please to not endanger the future and dignity of our Dajjal Republic of Iran and spare us our ignorance in following such butchering false Prophets who defile Islam and the Human race in that land that Allah has forsaken as a godless nation of Dajall’s Mullahs now seen as by all Islam and the world as Godless Iran.



FREEDOM’S Baṣīrah (بصيرة)
●│▒│▒│
●│▒│▒│
●│▒│▒│(BOOT)
●│▒│▒|▒│▒│▒│▒││▒│
●│▒ ▒││▒│DAJJAL AYATOLLA ALI KHAMENEI & FOLLOWERS

We know who/where you are my brother, keep an eye out for BIG Brother, he knows of you now that you have come out, as we hope you all do from the darkness of Allah's rath and scorn upon your defiling acts in his name in land of the Dajjal's Iran...


That is all!

thanks for the compliment,
your harsh criticism is a certificate of authenticity for me,

you do not show yourself,
but your words and posters express yourself very well,
more than...even you cant imagine,

every humanbeing has an equipment of judgement inside,
and, i trust that equipment much,

i know...you are a trader,
you only trade,
you only praise your product...
thats why you praise mousavi.

NEDA’S FREEDOM Baṣīrah (بصيرة)
●│▒│▒│
●│▒│▒│
●│▒│▒│(BOOT)
●│▒│▒|▒│▒│▒│▒││▒│
●│▒ ▒││▒│DAJJAL AYATOLLA ALI KHAMENEI & FOLLOWERS

In Iran, One Woman's Death May Have Many Consequences



Iran's revolution has now run through a full cycle. A gruesomely captivating video of a young woman - laid out on a Tehran street after apparently being shot, blood pouring from her mouth and then across her face - swept Twitter, Facebook and other websites this weekend. The woman rapidly became a symbol of Iran's escalating crisis, from a political confrontation to far more ominous physical clashes. Some sites refer to her as "Neda," Farsi for the voice or the call. Tributes that incorporate startlingly upclose footage of her dying have started to spring up on YouTube.


Although it is not yet clear who shot "Neda" (a soldier? pro-government militant? an accidental misfiring?), her death may have changed everything. For the cycles of mourning in Shiite Islam actually provide a schedule for political combat - a way to generate or revive momentum. Shiite Muslims mourn their dead on the third, seventh and 40th days after a death, and these commemorations are a pivotal part of Iran's rich history. During the revolution, the pattern of confrontations between the shah's security forces and the revolutionaries often played out in 40-day cycles. (See pictures of terror in the streets of Tehran.)


The first clashes in January 1978 produced two deaths that were then commemorated on the 40th day in mass gatherings, which in turn produced new confrontations with security forces - and new deaths. Those deaths then generated another 40-day period of mourning, new clashes, and further deaths. The cycle continued throughout most of the year until the shah's ouster in January 1979.


The same cycle has already become an undercurrent in Iran's current crisis. The largest demonstration, on Thursday of last week, was called by opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi to commemorate the deaths of protesters three days after they were killed.


Shiite mourning is not simply a time to react with sadness. Particularly in times of conflict, it is also an opportunity for renewal. The commemorations for "Neda" and the others killed this weekend are still to come. And the 40th day events are usually the largest and most important.


"Neda" is already being hailed as a martyr, a second important concept in Shiism. With the reported deaths of 19 people Saturday, martyrdom also provides a potent force that could further deepen public anger at Iran's regime. (See the Top Ten Players in Iran's Power Struggle.)


The belief in martyrdom is central to modern politics as well as Shiite tradition dating back centuries in Iran. It too helped propel the 1979 revolution. It sustained Iran during the eight-year war with Iraq, when over 120,000 Iranians died in the bloodiest modern Middle East conflict. Most major Iranian cities have a Martyrs' Museum or a Martyrs' cemetery.


The first Shiite martyr was Hussein, the prophet Mohammed's grandson. He believed it was better to die fighting injustice than to live with injustice under what he believed was illegitimate rule.


In the seventh century, Hussein and a band of fewer than 100 people, including women and children, took on the mighty Umayyad dynasty in Karbala, an ancient city in Mesopotamia now in modern-day Iraq. They knew they would be massacred.


Fourteen centuries later, Hussein's tomb in Karbala is one of the two holiest Shiite shrines - and millions of Iranians still make pilgrimages there every year. Just as Christians reenact Jesus' procession bearing the cross past the fourteen stops to Calvary before his crucifixion, so too do Shiites every year reenact Hussein's martyrdom in an Islamic passion play during the holy period of Ashura.


Because of Hussein, revolt against tyranny became part of Shiite tradition. Indeed, protest and martyrdom are widely considered duties to God. And nowhere is the practice more honored than in Iran, the world's largest Shiite country.


The revolutionaries exploited the deep passion about martyrdom as well as the timetable of Shiite mourning in whipping up greater opposition to Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi. With the deaths of "Neda" and others, they may now find the same phenomena used against them.




The Murder of Neda in this Video brings destruction closer to these Dajjal supporters & Apoatate Imams of Persia and within the Immah.



The End, for these False Prophets and Dajjal followers’ reign of terror and murder in Iran, Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan, is at hand and Allah’s will, will be done onto these Demon Dajjals whose false Islam defile’s the true faith of Islam as Allah extends his final Judgment onto their evil apostates and followers in his true meaning and value of Islam within the Immah.


THE END IS NEAR DAJALL APOSTATES!!

O enemies!

You have misjudged shias once again,

Shias are very very social people,
They have hundreds of calibrations and social events every year,
Karbala is the landmark in all events,

Shias gather on that occasions and discuss things,
Shias know each other very well,
Shias value their identity and prestige,

Gatherings every second or third day kill rumors that are spread by enemies,
Because, during gatherings they exchange views and discuss experiences,
Through continued interaction and exchange of views rumors are automatically removed,

Yes, you can spread rumors through your agents,
But, how many agents you can purchase and produce?
Rumor at the beginning runs very fast like tiger, but how many miles tiger can run?
One mile? Two miles? Three miles? And then rumor dies,
If, tiger fails to catch the prey within limitation, then?

But, this is not tiger game,
Once, the rumor proved wrong, the agent who spreads that rumor also loses credibility,
So, how many agents will you replace??? How many ???
You have destroyed billions of dollars of your taxpayer public money during last 30 years,
And, you gained nothing,

Interactions, debates, discussions, gatherings are considered pillars in shias,
And, when there are continued interactions, debates, discussions and gatherings, no rumor can prevail,

When, there are continued interactions, debates, discussions and gatherings, there is no room for strangers and strange ideas,

This is the basic reason that’s why there is no wall between people and govt in Iran,
Neither you can create such wall,

Yes! I know O enemy,
You are seen when this wall exists,

But, O enemy,
You are mistaken again,
The wall that inspires you very much at the moment, was always there,
Worshippers of kingdom never removed that wall during last 30 years,
The wall that you trust much today, is a wall between worshippers of kingdom separating them from people and govt of iran,

People and govt of iran were united yesterday,
People and govt of iran are united today, and,
People and govt of iran will remain united in future,

throwing your bad wishes in the dustbin of time.

Millions of family members and relatives of those, who martyred during 1979 revolution by the western bullets, are alive today and watching all that very closely,

Millions of family members and relatives of those, who martyred during 1980-1988 saddam imposed war, are alive today and very closely monitoring events,

Millions of family members and relatives of those, who martyred and suffered heavy casualties from the terrorist activities of mko, jundullah and etc, are alive today and observing the situation very patiently,

Millions of family members and relatives of those, who martyred or disabled for life due to chemical attacks planned by saddam plus western govts, are alive and looking events with great concern,

Millions and millions of families, who were brutally oppressed during shah’s western installed kingdom, and now are enjoying the fruit of freedom and benefitting from the current open and free system, are alive and vigilantly watching all events,

They all belong to middle class of the society,
They all meet on family occasions and national calibrations,
They all discuss things very frankly with each other,
They all exchange views on politics and western attitude that west showed during last 30 years,
They all are very well aware that how western sanctions killed millions of Iraqis imposed by champions of human rights of the world,

They all very well remember events that how western govts were cheerful at the destruction of oil refineries, factories and other infrastructure during saddam’s bombing,

They all keep events in mind when saddam’s army men were brutally killing innocent civilians in khoramshahr after invasion and cnn, bbc and other human right tools were silent then,

Now, abruptly, all western govts have become lover of mousavi, why???

People are not fools, especially Iranians,
Because Iranians have suffered much from western covert actions and decisions,
And they are very well aware that why west has become lover of Iranians within twenty four hours of elections,

While 30 years of record of love shows otherwise,

Imagine! If these millions and millions of people decided to show their political power,
then ????

where mousavi and his few hundred thousands rich and sub-rich supporters will sit then ???

Imagine! If these millions and millions of people decided to show their political power, this is what we Dajjal followers of our evil vile false prophets who defile the Immah and Allah himself, praise be onto his name, FEAR THE MOST as they grow to increasingly rejects your false Islam of murder and hate.

Precisley what your Jinn Prophets FEAR THE MOST, the people DECIDING and not the tyrants of your murderous dreams.

Folklore, mystical, Persian mythology and this 6th century mindsets in your land of Jinnistan, now that’s the ticket to the real world reality of these murdering defilers of Islam these followers of the Jinn Dajall Omar and Laden and ALI KHAMENEI and followers.

These defiling apostate Jinn Jihadist false Mullah Supremacist, their likeness the Taliban Thugs of false islam and AIQ, Islams apostate mass murders are being defeated and rejected EVERYWHERE even in Pakistan and Afghanistan and now in Jinn Land created by theocracy of Persia. They all stand weakened and facing their end, as Allah will be is being done upon those who apostate and defile his words and their meansings.. (1 Kings 6:7 and Qur'an 15:27)

[15:15] they will say, "Our eyes have been deceived. We have been bewitched."
[15:48] Never will they suffer any fatigue therein; never will they be evicted therefrom.
[15:49] Inform My servants that I am the Forgiver, Most Merciful.
[15:50] And that My retribution is the most painful retribution.
15:79] Consequently, we avenged from them, and both communities are fully documented.
[15:80] The people of Al-Hijr disbelieved the messengers.
[15:81] We gave them our revelations, but they disregarded them.
[15:82] They used to carve secure homes out of the mountains.
[15:83] The disaster hit them in the morning.
[15:84] What they hoarded did not help them.


The end is near for your Dajjal followers who defile Islam and murder Muslims far more than those they pretend are the enemies of Islam as foretold in The word "Dhikr".

Obviously Muhammad was wrong about (גַּבְרִיאֵל,; Latin: Gabrielus; Greek: Γαβριήλ, Gabriēl; Arabic: جبريل, Jibrīl or جبرائيل Jibrail; as he gave a reluctant disbelieving Mohammad the
Quran..Proving your so called good Muslims are not good atoll, but Dajjal followers that defile Islam and Allah, whose will being upon them as they die by the thousands as Allah is cognizant of all things particular evil among those who pretend to act in his name but only act in self power to control and destroy his Immah..


Beware of the consequences of "deep packet screening" my Dajjal Jinn, as it will be your undoing...


That is all!!

you criticise harshly on supreme leader of iran, dont you?
just to safegaurd your own supreme leadership chair in the world, dont you?

please correct me if i am wrong.

Iranian Elections: The ‘Stolen Elections Hoax'
James Petras - Information Clearing House
June 19, 2009

few pieces of article:

Iran’s presidential election drew a record turnout of more than 80% of the electorate,
including an unprecedented overseas vote of 234,812, in which HM won 111,792 to MA’s 78,300.

The opposition led by HM (Hussein Moussavi) did not accept their defeat and organized a series of mass demonstrations that turned violent, resulting in the burning and destruction of automobiles, banks, public building and armed confrontations with the police and other authorities.

Almost the entire spectrum of Western opinion makers, including all the major electronic and print media, the major liberal, radical, libertarian and conservative web-sites, echoed the opposition’s claim of rampant election fraud.

Neo-conservatives, libertarian conservatives and Trotskyites joined the Zionists in hailing the opposition protestors as the advance guard of a democratic revolution.

Democrats and Republicans condemned the incumbent regime, refused to recognize the result of the vote and praised the demonstrators’ efforts to overturn the electoral outcome.

The New York Times, CNN, Washington Post, the Israeli Foreign Office and the entire leadership of the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations called for harsher sanctions against Iran and announced Obama’s proposed dialogue with Iran as ‘dead in the water’.


Western leaders rejected the results because they ‘knew’ that their reformist candidate could not lose…

For months they published daily interviews, editorials and reports from the field ‘detailing’ the failures of Ahmadinejad’s administration;

they cited the support from clerics, former officials, merchants in the bazaar and above all women and young urbanites fluent in English, to prove that Mousavi was headed for a landslide victory.

A victory for Mousavi was described as a victory for the ‘voices of moderation’, at least the White House’s version of that vacuous cliché. Prominent liberal academics deduced the vote count was fraudulent because the opposition candidate, Mousavi, lost in his own ethnic enclave among the Azeris.

Other academics claimed that the ‘youth vote’ – based on their interviews with upper and middle-class university students from the neighborhoods of Northern Tehran were overwhelmingly for the ‘reformist’ candidate.

What is astonishing about the West’s universal condemnation of the electoral outcome as fraudulent is that not a single shred of evidence in either written or observational form has been presented either before or a week after the vote count.

During the entire electoral campaign, no credible (or even dubious) charge of voter tampering was raised.

As long as the Western media believed their own propaganda of an immanent victory for their candidate, the electoral process was described as highly competitive, with heated public debates and unprecedented levels of public activity and unhindered by public proselytizing. The belief in a free and open election was so strong that the Western leaders and mass media believed that their favored candidate would win.

The Western media relied on its reporters covering the mass demonstrations of opposition supporters, ignoring and downplaying the huge turnout for Ahmadinejad.

Worse still, the Western media ignored the class composition of the competing demonstrations – the fact that the incumbent candidate was drawing his support from the far more numerous poor working class, peasant, artisan and public employee sectors while the bulk of the opposition demonstrators was drawn from the upper and middle class students, business and professional class.

Moreover, most Western opinion leaders and reporters based in Tehran extrapolated their projections from their observations in the capital – few venture into the provinces, small and medium size cities and villages where Ahmadinejad has his mass base of support.

Moreover the opposition’s supporters were an activist minority of students easily mobilized for street activities, while Ahmadinejad’s support drew on the majority of working youth and household women workers who would express their views at the ballot box and had little time or inclination to engage in street politics.

A number of newspaper pundits, including Gideon Rachman of the Financial Times, claim as evidence of electoral fraud the fact that Ahmadinejad won 63% of the vote in an Azeri-speaking province against his opponent, Mousavi, an ethnic Azeri.

The simplistic assumption is that ethnic identity or belonging to a linguistic group is the only possible explanation of voting behavior rather than other social or class interests. A closer look at the voting pattern in the East-Azerbaijan region of Iran reveals that Mousavi won only in the city of Shabestar among the upper and the middle classes (and only by a small margin), whereas he was soundly defeated in the larger rural areas, where the re-distributive policies of the Ahmadinejad government had helped the ethnic Azeris write off debt, obtain cheap credits and easy loans for the farmers.

Mousavi did win in the West-Azerbaijan region, using his ethnic ties to win over the urban voters. In the highly populated Tehran province, Mousavi beat Ahmadinejad in the urban centers of Tehran and Shemiranat by gaining the vote of the middle and upper class districts, whereas he lost badly in the adjoining working class suburbs, small towns and rural areas.

The careless and distorted emphasis on ‘ethnic voting’ cited by writers from the Financial Times and New York Times to justify calling Ahmadinejad ‘s victory a ‘stolen vote’ is matched by the media’s willful and deliberate refusal to acknowledge a rigorous nationwide public opinion poll conducted by two US experts just three weeks before the vote, which showed Ahmadinejad leading by a more than 2 to 1 margin – even larger than his electoral victory on June 12.

This poll revealed that among ethnic Azeris, Ahmadinejad was favored by a 2 to 1 margin over Mousavi, demonstrating how class interests represented by one candidate can overcome the ethnic identity of the other candidate (Washington Post June 15, 2009).

The poll also demonstrated how class issues, within age groups, were more influential in shaping political preferences than ‘generational life style’.

According to this poll, the 18-24 year olds “comprised the strongest voting bloc for Ahmadinejad of all groups” (Washington Porst June 15, 2009).

The only group, which consistently favored Mousavi, was the university students and graduates, business owners and the upper middle class.

The ‘youth vote’, which the Western media praised as ‘pro-reformist’, was a clear minority of less than 30% but came from a highly privileged, vocal and largely English speaking group with a monopoly on the Western media.

Their overwhelming presence in the Western news reports created what has been referred to as the ‘North Tehran Syndrome’, for the comfortable upper class enclave from which many of these students come. While they may be articulate, well dressed and fluent in English, they were soundly out-voted in the secrecy of the ballot box.

In general, Ahmadinejad did very well in the oil and chemical producing provinces.

This may have be a reflection of the oil workers’ opposition to the ‘reformist’ program, which included proposals to ‘privatize’ public enterprises.

Likewise, the incumbent did very well along the border provinces because of his emphasis on strengthening national security from US and Israeli threats in light of an escalation of US-sponsored cross-border terrorist attacks from Pakistan and Israeli-backed incursions from Iraqi Kurdistan, which have killed scores of Iranian citizens.

Sponsorship and massive funding of the groups behind these attacks is an official policy of the US from the Bush Administration, which has not been repudiated by President Obama; in fact it has escalated in the lead-up to the elections.

What Western commentators and their Iranian protégés have ignored is the powerful impact which the devastating US wars and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan had on Iranian public opinion,

The open attacks by opposition economists of the government welfare spending, easy credit and heavy subsidies of basic food staples did little to ingratiate them with the majority of Iranians benefiting from those programs.

The state was seen as the protector and benefactor of the poor workers against the ‘market’, which represented wealth, power, privilege and corruption.

The Opposition’s attack on the regime’s ‘intransigent’ foreign policy and positions ‘alienating’ the West only resonated with the liberal university students and import-export business groups. To many Iranians, the regime’s military buildup was seen as having prevented a US or Israeli attack.

The scale of the opposition’s electoral deficit should tell us is how out of touch it is with its own people’s vital concerns.

It should remind them that by moving closer to Western opinion, they removed themselves from the everyday interests of security, housing, jobs and subsidized food prices that make life tolerable for those living below the middle class and outside the privileged gates of Tehran University.

Amhadinejad’s electoral success, seen in historical comparative perspective should not be a surprise.

In similar electoral contests between nationalist-populists against pro-Western liberals, the populists have won.

Past examples include Peron in Argentina and,
most recently, Chavez of Venezuela,
Evo Morales in Bolivia
and even Lula da Silva in Brazil,

all of whom have demonstrated an ability to secure close to or even greater than 60% of the vote in free elections. The voting majorities in these countries prefer social welfare over unrestrained markets, national security over alignments with military empires.

Recent events suggest that political leaders in Europe, and even some in Washington, do not accept the Zionist-mass media line of ‘stolen elections’.

The White House has not suspended its offer of negotiations with the newly re-elected government but has focused rather on the repression of the opposition protesters (and not the vote count). Likewise, the 27 nation European Union expressed ‘serious concern about violence’ and called for the “aspirations of the Iranian people to be achieved through peaceful means and that freedom of expression be respected” (Financial Times June 16, 2009 p.4). Except for Sarkozy of France, no EU leader has questioned the outcome of the voting.

The consequences of the electoral victory of Ahmadinejad are open to debate.

The US may conclude that continuing to back a vocal, but badly defeated, minority has few prospects for securing concessions on nuclear enrichment and an abandonment of Iran’s support for Hezbollah and Hamas.

A realistic approach would be to open a wide-ranging discussion with Iran, and acknowledging, as Senator Kerry recently pointed out, that enriching uranium is not an existential threat to anyone. This approach would sharply differ from the approach of American Zionists, embedded in the Obama regime, who follow Israel’s lead of pushing for a preemptive war with Iran and use the specious argument that no negotiations are possible with an ‘illegitimate’ government in Tehran which ‘stole an election’.

[15:15] they will say, "Our eyes have been deceived. We have been bewitched."



[15:50] (Tyrants of Jinn al Persia know ye that Allah's retribution is the most painful retribution.



The masks of False Prophets has now been shown to the world as to what they were, but masked Jinn Dajjal Apostates of murderous Tryanny forced onto the faithful, now shown in TRUTHS light, for what they really were, evil, thugs and 6th century barbarians, who are NOW FOREVER MORE, proven FALSE and UNTRUE to Islam and the Immah...



FOR NEDA, THE VOICE!!

Have they even found out who killed NEda yet?

have you found out who were behind the murder of jfk yet ???

so, would you like to start violent riots to regime+system change as you advice iranians???

during sarkozy's elections, france faced riots. dozens killed more than 700 vehiles torched. but france is a peaceful country. during election periods it happens every where. during that period people's sentiments are high. but it all cools down with the passage of time. you can see it this way or other, its up to you.

"In my Ummah, there shall be born Thirty Grand Liars (Dajjals), each of whom will claim to be a prophet, But I am the Last Prophet; there is no Prophet after Me." Furthermore, the Quran declares:

"Who is guilty of more wrong than he who forgeth a lie against Allah (God), or saith: I am inspired, when he is not inspired in aught; and who saith: I will reveal the like of that which Allah hath revealed? If thou couldst see, when the wrong-doers reach the pangs of death and the angels stretch their hands out (saying): Deliver up your souls. This day ye are awarded doom of degradation for that ye spake concerning Allah other than the truth, and used to scorn His portents. (Qur'an 6:93)"

The Bukhari mentions the Antichrist, saying: "Shall I not tell you about the Dajjal a story of which no prophet told his nation? The Dajjall (Antichrist) is one-eyed and will bring with him what will resemble Hell and Paradise, and what he will call Paradise will be actually Hell; so I warn you (against him) as Noah warned his nation against him."[1]
Therefore, Islam denounces the misunderstanding that a man with perfect features will be the Antichrist. On the other hand it supports the Judaistic theology that satanic forces would be sent in the form of Antichrist to test the whole mankind.

The Iranian Grand lairs, may Allah bring them by 10 times what is on this Video

you have finished thousands of jobs up to now,
'job finished' is your slogan,

but actually, none of your job was finished completely,
every finished job has created thousands of new jobs,

and you are bussy in creating and finishing jobs,
of course, you have trillions of taxpayer money,
so enjoy with it by finishing and creating new jobs every now and then.

Sale…..sale….sale,

Freedom for 5 dollars,
Change for 10 dollars,
One bottle of best American wine is free for change,

So, run…run…run for freedom and change,

If, you want to kiss on the street openly and freely in front of all,
Then…run…run…run for freedom,

If, you want to lock the scarf in your basement inside the strongest metal cupboard,
Then come…come…come to freedom for five dollars only,

If, you want to sell the motherland in exchange of one bottle of imported wine,
Then stride…stride…stride…and catch the change,

If, you feel a surge of enjoyment after every sunset,
Then, run…run…run for prostitutes in freedom for 5 dollars only,

If, you want to kiss your woman on the street to show your authority that she is your personal property and she allows your hands every where on her body in public places,
Then, this is freedom, so that run…run…run for it,

If, you want to oust your parent from your home and put them in the cage of old houses, so that parent can not object and restrict your activity,
Then, run…run…run for change. This is available for sale on 10 dollars only,

If, you believe that the body of women is a public garden,
Then, move quickly for it. This is available in change for 10 dollars only,

If, you believe that labors are just spare parts of a machine owned by corporatism,
Then, go for shield of change. This is available for 10 dollars only,

If, you believe that human beings are the consumption materials of businessmen,
Then, go for cash for honor for change. This is available for 10 dollars only.

If, you consider privacy as restriction, and,
You want to kiss your women on the street instead,
Then, run…run…run for freedom. This is available in public for sale for 5 dollars only,

This is all new imported material just for your amusement and enjoyment on cheap price,
So, run for it,

Run for freedom,
Run for cash,
Run for change,

Not God, but obama bless you,
Not God, but brown bless you,

Run…run.

Iran's Turmoil Opens Rift Among Shiites Across Mideast

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124597231749357065.html

In the 14 centuries since the Dajjal defiling Shia split the Ummah, never before 1980 was there a religious basis from the words of Mohammad, peace be unto him, that supported or evidence the existence of the evil Jinn NEW Dajjal theology of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s “wilayat al-faqih,” literally "guardianship by a jurist" -- holds that, in an Islamic state, a divinely anointed scholar of Islamic law must exercise unquestioned authority over elected officials and the rest of the government.

Nor is there anywhere in Shia Islam outside of Iran that holds to this False Dictatorial Prophets idea of one person Religious authority over all things and all beings, that deviant idea that came from the Jinn Khomeini mindless lust for absolute power in the name of the false Islam, he, Khomeini, and his murderous followers created for their personal power of theological dictatorship by tyranny.

The theology of wilayat al-faqih was first formulated by the Iranian revolution's leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, in a 1970 book that he wrote as an exile in the Iraqi city of Najaf, the traditional center of Shiite learning. Ayatollah Khomeini's ideas were hotly disputed at the time by other Shiite luminaries in Najaf, such as the late Grand Ayatollah Abu al Qassim Khoei, who feared that placing supreme authority in the hands of one cleric would dangerously taint faith with politics, eventually undermining religion itself.

We now see, in these Persian Theological Dictators, how such concentrated evil and dajjal-ism can use such power to defile, in Balsamic tyranny, the word of Allah as passed on by Mohammad, for their own gain and lust of a false Prophecy.

Recent events in this Dajjal Persia are the biggest proof yet that wilayat al-faqih is not part of the religious beliefs of Islam, but it is a power and political ideology," Syed Ali Amine, the Shiite mufti -- or chief religious authority said. "Those who protested in the streets of Tehran did not offend religion or the Shiite sect."

Likewise the Shiite religious leader with the biggest influence, Najaf-based Grand Ayatollah Ali al Sistani -- who rivals Ayatollah Khamenei as a marjaa for Shiites around the world -- has kept quiet on the Iranian crisis. But a person familiar with the matter said this week he privately has found them non-Islamic. Also noted was that Ayatollah Sistani declined Mr. Ahmadinejad's request for a meeting during the Iranian president's visit to Iraq last year. At the time, Mr. Ahmadinejad said he had canceled a trip to Najaf because of a tight schedule.

McMood your subspecies are near your end, may Allah not be anymore merciful to your 6th century sub-species as your kind has been to the rest of the Ummah and humanity as a whole.




Your False Islam's days are "numbered" by Allah himself, McMood!

rift is invention,
you may use difference of opinion instead,

of course, shias are alive,
they discuss, debate and believe strongly in dialogues,
this is shia's speciality,

since thousand of years, shias are very creative and peace loving people,
i haven't heard any war initiated by shias ever in history,
shias are one of pillers of mankind,
pillers always need repair,
and debate, discussions and interactions are the repair work for pillers,
but, few individuals like ustrader, from thousands of miles away, see things differently.

As is a long held custom and Sharia principle among the Ummah, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED JINN-IST, YOUR DAJJAL AND THEIR DREAMS, IF NOT CHANGED, ARE NEAR THEIR END!



That is all!!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529780...test=latestnews

Only a mindless troll with absolute unconscious awareness of the world they live in would post this in silent requisite.

Then again, one delusional progressive turd did, hey!

Having seen more up close and personal “lung shots” than I care to remember among both friends and foes, the shot does not cause the death, per se, the person, as I saw on the Neda real time video, merely drowns, as their heart pumps blood into their lungs until they fill up and the blood back flows from “both” their nose and mouth having no other place to go but up and out the esophagus as the heart beats and pumps more and more blood into the ruptured lung or lungs. It is when the heart stops beating, usual some few minites later, as we saw on this video of Neda, that the flow of blood rushing out of the nose and mouth stops, again, as I saw on the video…


A heart shot is rather quick, before most hit the ground, from a standing position, the heart has stopped pumping and any blood pumped bleeds into the chest and abdomin rarely if ever out of the mouth and nose at the same time and especially on a flat surface with no downard slope at the head, as we saw here.

Of this I am absolutely certain...


[15:15] they will say, "Our eyes have been deceived. We have been bewitched."

[[15:50] And that my retribution is the most painful retribution.





That is all!!

Why must the liberal trolls swallow whatever drivel they can drag up, without any searching of the facts and running only with rumors? Because they'll do anything to support anyone who the conservatives on this forum are for? What do you call that?...........kneejerk?

Yes, this is a lung shot which caused her to drown in her own blood. Another forum which I visit has been discussing this among three+ different military men who agree this is a true lung shot, which they, as well as you, have witnessed first hand. However, the criminals of the present Iran regime and the looney tune liberals on this forum know far more than any military person. Just ask them.

And, looks like Mr. Hussemenieman here is getting some flack thrown at his views as well. Clerical Leaders Defy Ayatollah on Iran Election

Article Tools Sponsored By
By MICHAEL SLACKMAN and NAZILA FATHI
Published: July 4, 2009

CAIRO — An important group of religious leaders in Iran called the disputed presidential election and the new government illegitimate on Saturday, an act of defiance against the country’s supreme leader and the most public sign of a major split in the country’s clerical establishment....

A statement by the group, the Association of Researchers and Teachers of Qum, represents a significant, if so far symbolic, setback for the government and especially the authority of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, whose word is supposed to be final. The government has tried to paint the opposition and its top presidential candidate, Mir Hussein Moussavi, as criminals and traitors, a strategy that now becomes more difficult....

So sad. So bad. The criminal Ackmendidajob ( sympathizers, including the ones on this forum) are considered..............wrooooooonnnnnng by the clerics in Iran. However, of course, our liberal loons on this site are far more knowledgeable (on everything!), now aren't they?

In a message issued on Saturday on 4th of july 2009, the Qom Seminary Teachers Society felicitated Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on his reelection as president. The society also thanked the nation for their massive turnout in the June 12 election, calling it an “epic”. Of the 46.2 million eligible voters about 40 million participated in the election.

In their message the seminary teachers also insisted that now that the competition is over it is a time for friendship and cooperation. The society also stated that country’s potentials should be employed to serve the nation.

Iranian diplomats, who were abducted by the U.S. troops in Iraq in 2007, are still in us prison,
Those diplomats have family, children, parents and relatives,
But they are under American prison without any charge for two years,
No bbc, no cnn, no fox or else show even a little interest on that matter,
No freedom, no democracy, no human rights look the matter,

While mr.obama, custodian of Iranian prisoners on one hand, sings the song of human rights for Iranian nation on the other hand???

How strange, isn’t it???

The selective song of human rights can not create just effects,
The custodian of innocent prisoners without charge for years can not cry for human rights,

Those, who create divisions intentionally and deliberately in universal laws of human rights to discriminate one branch of people and cry for another branch, are nothing but jokers and showpiece actors.

Four Iranian nationals were abducted while traveling southern Lebanon in 1982,
Its 27th year now, and all human rights activists and freedom actors and democracy actresses are silent and never raise their voice on those abducted Iranians,

It means, they side criminals on one hand to weaken Iranians, but failed,
So, now they have come up from another angle in the shape of human rights champions with the same purpose to weaken Iranian,

Enemies of Iranian nation do not believe in human rights but only change direction with same purpose and goal to weaken Iranians,

In the pretext of peaceful protests, enemies want to create a group in Iran that solely depends on enemies, and then enemies will call them:

“hey, take this gun, and kill people”
“hey, take this bomb and fix in the crowd”
“hey, the govt is against you”
“hey, destroy the govt”

This is the game of enemy. They want to create havoc and chaos in Iran to topple the ‘disobedient govt of Iran’.

أسطورة من 6th القرن دائما نسمع الجن الملوثين. يقول الله تعالى في "أمتي" ، وسيكون المولود في الثلاثين العظمى الكذابون (Dajjals) ، كل واحد منهم يدعي أنه نبي ، ولكن أنا نبي آخر ، وليس هناك نبي بعدي. "
بالجن أتباع الإسلام Dajjal كاذبة عن مقتل أكثر المؤمنين. انهم اعداء الاسلام..

If, western societies are positive,
What does it mean ???

Does it mean that that Islamic society in iran is less positive ???
Why ???

Why is this that with all negative changes that western societies have made on all human societies, yet, there is an impression that western societies are better ???

Why there is such impression in people minds ???
Why ???

This is a very serious question,

Why people think that way ???
This should be properly investigated that why is this,

Suppose,

If, I am thirsty, (or any one)
I do not need obama’s statement or bbc or cnn special reports or a fatwa from a religious personality or a unsc resolution to know that that I am thirsty, do I ???

I just feel it,
Even if, the whole world says that I am not thirsty, I won’t accept it,
Because I know that I am thirsty,

This is the decision that my body has taken automatically as per natural requirement of my body,

No propaganda, no obama, no sarkozy, no milliband, no fatwa, no unsc resolution, no bbc, no cnn can change the decision of my body,

Even if, I myself can not resist the decision taken by my body,
Until I am fresh, healthy, aware and alive,

As same, there are some decisions that human bodies automatically take after natural analysis inside hearts and minds when human beings encounter some thing new or different,

For example, people encounter narcotics but more than 90% people of the world automatically decide that they should not take it,

Why ????

Because, people know that this is narcotic and this bad for health,
Isn’t it ???

So, what is the main reason of such decision that people take ???
Knowledge, clear-cut understanding, zero confusion,

But, there are people who decide otherwise,
There are people, who decide that narcotic is positive for them,
Why they decide that ???

Although they are aware of narcotic’s destruction,
Yet, they decide in favor of narcotics ???
Why ???

They know that there is no benefit in use of narcotics,
They know that the use of narcotics is illegal and bad,
They know that narcotics will definitely harm their health,
They know that narcotics will shorten their lives,

Yet, they decide in favor of narcotics,
Why ?????

Is it wise, because people like to use narcotics,
So that govt should allow it not only allow it but freely distribute it in public,
Do you agree with this ???

Of course, there are people, who like narcotics,
Of course, there are some immediate and temporary benefits in use of narcotics,

So, because a group of people like narcotics, should govt make the use of narcotics lawful ???
Would you agree to this proposal ???

Of course, you would never agree to this proposal,

If, I ask why???
If, I object on your disagreement to this proposal, then,
If, I call your objection as ‘death to dictator’ then,
If, I name your objection as a forceful imposition of your wish, then,
If, I dislike and reject your laws and regulations in respect of narcotics, then,

I have reasons to disagree with you,
My first reason is, I like narcotics,
My second reason is, I feel comfortable in narcotics,
My third reason is, my whole friends use narcotics,
My fourth reason is, I want to give my friends a good company,
Etc…etc…etc,


So, because I have reasons, would you like to allow me use of narcotics ????

Of course not,
You will never allow me,
Not only you will disallow me but you will handover me to law enforcement agencies, if I insist regularly ???

Now you understand that how common decisions are made automatically in our hearts and minds ???

There is no doubt that western societies have various positive points,
But, it does not mean that the Islamic system is useless,

What is the difference between Islamic society and western society ???

For example, there are prostitutes in both western and Islamic societies. Both majority of westerners and non-westerners don’t like prostitutes.

The only difference is in treatment.

In western societies, prostitutes are disliked; however, they are not questioned. They can continue their lives as a prostitute as long as they want. No problem. They have no social problem. They are free and respectable.

In Islamic society, however, prostitutes are not only disliked but disrespected. Prostitutes can not continue their profession as a prostitute in Islamic society openly and freely and in a respectable manner. People will never want to be seen ever with them in day lights, no matter even if they spend the whole night with them. If, prostitutes are caught by law enforcement agencies, they are punished according to law.

Let’s compare both attitudes:

Western laws and regulations fully protect the respect and right of prostitute,
Islamic laws and regulations fully discourage and deny the right of prostitute,

Do you call Islamic laws as inhumane, insulting, hypocrisy and old-fashioned???
Do you call western laws as human, dignified, true and proper???

By protecting few individual’s rights and dignity, western laws deny the respect and dignity of majority, because majority of people do not like prostitution. There are millions and millions of people in usa and west who never touched a prostitute in their whole life,

By rejecting few individual’s rights and dignity, Islamic laws protect the respect and dignity of majority, majority of people do not like prostitution. There are only one percent or less who either themselves are prostitutes or in need of prostitutes,

The behavior of giving full respect, dignity and honor to prostitutes by western society actually provided an opportunity to prostitutes to mix up in society freely, boldly and openly. This has caused an over whelming spread of prostitution in western society. You could not have imagined the honorable status of prostitutes as they have today in western society, just fifty years ago. Today prostitutes in western society have display centers, training centers, massage centers, websites, posters, porn advertisements, porn movies, promotional programs and calibrations, quick fishing trips, etc. they are free to recruit new, young, fresh and healthy individuals by offering them impressive ransoms. So, every day, there is an addition of hundreds of new and young prostitutes in western society. An eighteen years old adult starts career as prostitute openly, honorably and confidently and will remain in this profession for at least 30 years. The rolling of money and opportunity towards new adult by adopting prostitution as an honorable profession will inspire many others.

Just calculate on your fingers yourself,
even if you have a little goat brain, that what is the natural end of this whole situation???
How long can you go along with this???
May be another fifty years??? Then???

Do you think that its just ok???

The whole break up and destruction of family system and values,
is it in your own favor ???

honorable mothers and fathers and parental balance, where secure kids and their mommy papa enjoy life, are becoming less day by day, moth by month and year by year and the numbers of those who grow up with prostitute mothers are growing in society gradually but definitely,

is it ok???
If I say this, am I an enemy of western society ???

The behavior of paying zero respect to prostitutes in Islamic society has denied the opportunity to prostitutes to mix up in society. Prostitutes in Islamic society may continue their profession but underground with the help and support of corrupt characters of society. Prostitutes in Islamic society are not facilitated and recognized by law and behavior of society. The discouraging behavior of Islamic society towards prostitutes produces no inspiration in prostitution. That’s why prostitution is limited between 8.00pm to 8.00am for those corrupts who cant sleep without them. They are in thousands or above but still they are less than one or two percent. It safeguarded family system and identity and background of individuals. Kids normally enjoy their parents. Mothers and fathers enjoy with their children. There is no concept of ‘old homes’ in Islamic system because children take care their parents like they care their own skin.

In western society prostitutes are wealthy and prosperous,
In Islamic society prostitutes have no guarantee,

In western society prostitutes have equal rights, it seems very good when you read it but it has long-term consequences. For example, if my daughter wants to have friendship with a prostitute, I can’t stop her. I can only try to convince my eighteen years old daughter that ‘be careful’. If, my eighteen years old daughter decides to spend evening with a prostitute, I can’t stop her. However, I can only explain to my young confident eighteen years old daughter to ‘please take care’. More than fifty percent young adults loose their innocence that way. It’s a reality. Sexual pleasure becomes their sole ideal for the rest of their lives. As they become older, they experiment ‘new ideas’. How many pass that way without losing their innocence??? Very few.

In Islamic society a prostitute by the name of prostitute have no right to enter into education centers or mix up with people openly, freely and confidently. I can complain to law if a prostitute wants to mix up with my son, daughter, brother or sister or else. I have protection. It means majority have protection. It means protection of majority rules over protection of corrupt minority. Of course, you can see it differently. So, if I have no objection on prostitution I can go for it but underground without enjoying protection of law.

This is not hypocrisy of Islamic system but this is hypocrisy of few corrupt muslims.


So, the question remains that why there is a concept that western system is better than Islamic system ???

Is western system completely corrupt???
No, western system has numerous positive things,

For example, if a prostitute is free in western society, then at the same time, science, literature, research, thoughts, music and theatre are also free to progress and develop in western societies,

This freedom on both corners of good and bad creates a balance for the path of progress,
But this balance is vanishing with the passage of time in favor of corruption.

There is no doubt that with the passage of time this imbalance will become more and more visible,

Every one can count on fingers that western society can not continue longer with such a system,

The clutch of vehicle of freedom of western society has been pressed and there is no breaks and no direction,

This western system with all positive things will definitely face a hard clash not with Islamic civilization but with itself sooner or later. You can count it,

While with all deficiencies in Islamic society, there is no fear of any clash of any kind in any future. If there is any clash in Islamic society, this is a clash between Islamic system versus ‘western narcotized’ muslims, in which Islamic system will defeat them because Islamic system is not based on enjoyments and emotions but it has solid reasons and mathematics,

With the passage of time Islamic system will grow and its deficiencies will lessen, because the deficiency in society is not due to Islamic system but it is due to corrupt individuals,

And the positive thing is:

Islam does not protect the freedom of corruption,
Islam does not ensure rights of corrupt,
Islam does not guarantee immodesty,

thats why riots in Islamic Iran to westernize it failed and will fail again in future if occerred.

The Sunday morning coup in Honduras shocked President Manuel Zelaya, who was still in his pajamas while giving a news conference in Costa Rica.

Zelaya was arrested in his pajamas Sunday morning by soldiers who stormed his residence and flew him into exile.
A day later, he sat beside Chavez and other allies at a Nicaragua meeting of the nine-nation ALBA alliance, which agreed to pull its ambassadors from Honduras and reject the replacement government's envoys.
Recalling his detention, he said his daughter hid under her bed for 35 minutes while masked soldiers burst in to the residence and searched for him. He was on the phone with a media outlet when the soldiers ordered him to drop the cell phone, he said.

He said the soldiers were shaking as they pointed their guns because they were "facing the president of the republic, and they knew it."

"I said, I'm not going to drop it. If you have been ordered to shoot, then shoot," Zelaya said.

He said the soldiers simply yanked the phone from his hand.

Zelaya retains the loyalty of many of Honduras' poor, for having raised the minimum wage and blaming the country's problems on the rich.

Farmworker Jesus Almendares, 30, said he was skipping work to protest the coup.
Workers Uniting, the international union, has condemned the military coup that has resulted in the illegal ousting of democratically-elected President Manuel Zelaya.


Zelaya is not a traditional character. He pushed back against the exploitation of his country by foreign "investors," thereby making enemies of corporate interests in the US and the wealthy conservatives of Honduras.

"Mr Zelaya's ally, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, blamed "the Yankee empire".
Venezuela's Chavez told the gathered leaders that "it's the moment to act" to restore Zelaya. "I'll do everything possible to overthrow this gorilla government of Honduras. It must be overthrown," the socialist leader said.

(Above mentioned words were taken from various websites just for information)

So, what is reaction of human rights champions of the world on the removal of democratically elected govt of Honduras? Actually the reaction is not different at all in any sense from the reaction they showcased after overthrowing democratically elected govt of mosaddiq in iran in 1953 copying same coup.

Lets see how they reacted on Honduras coup:

EUROPEAN UNION STATEMENT said: “This is [an] unacceptable violation of constitutional order in Honduras. The EU calls for the urgent release of President Zelaya and a swift return to constitutional normality.”
----------------------------------------------------

President Barack Obama of the United States said, "We believe that the coup ‘was’ not legal and that President Zelaya ‘remains’ the President of Honduras."

Note:
EU says: this ‘is’ while obama of usa says coup ‘was’ ???
What is this ???
If effects of an action continue, then its not an action but it’s a situation,
Coup does not exist now ???
What is the reason by using ‘was’ in the statement ???
So, coup now is legal ????
Is that what you mean ???

But, coup is still there and ‘is’ still a coup, it ‘is’ still illegal but not ‘was not legal’,

And what do you mean by ‘remains’ ???
Roman remains ???
-------------------------------------------------

French foreign ministry said: "France firmly condemns the coup that has ‘just’ taken place in Honduras. France calls on all parties to act with respect for the principles and values of democracy.”

Note:
It was just there???
It is not there now ???

What do you mean by all parties ????
Do you consider coup a party ???
Is this your western democracy ???
In your western democracy coup is a party ???
-----------------------------------------------------------
German foreign minister said: “it is ‘an act which violates the constitutional order’ of the Republic of Honduras. I call upon the ‘conflict parties’ to resume dialogue…”

Note:
On one hand you say ‘an act of violation of constitution, on the other hand in the same statement and in the same line you say ‘conflict parties’, what is this ???
What do you mean by conflict parties ???
There is only one party that violated law and removed democratically elected govt ???
So, if both are ‘conflict parties’ then why are you condemning it ???
So, if both are at conflict, it means you consider both equally in same status, then why are you issuing statement ??? just a showpiece for public consumption ???

And even, what do you mean by conflict here ???
Conflict is not a crime, but coup is crime, so why you use the word ‘conflict’ here ???
------------------------------------------------------------

Britain’s Chris Bryant, the British Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, said: "The UK condemns the ‘expulsion’ of President Zelaya and calls for the restoration of democratic, constitutional government in Honduras.”

Note:
What do you mean by expulsion ???
Do you consider military coup equal to expulsion???
Why you never used the word ‘coup’ here ???
Why didn’t you condemn military head by name here ???

What you mean by restoration of democratic govt ???
Do you mean restoration of zelaya’s democratically elected govt ???
But you didn’t mention it here ???
--------------------------------------------------------------

While in case of Iran, every official of britain, germany, france, and usa never missed an opportunity to condemn the govt of iran by naming it,

In case of Honduras, they never condemned the military head by naming his name, why???

While in iran, they never missed to condemn all officials from ahmadinejad to the peon in the president house. They tried to condemn each and every official of iran by name,

Just compare the statements above about Honduras with those, they issued against iran,

Why so difference ???
Why such enmity against Iran???

Although, there was no proof against election in Iran,
But, thanks to the Iranian election that it gave the world an opportunity to clearly witness the enmity of western govts against iran,

This is the hypocrisy of western democracy.

If, you demand Neda’s murderer (as inquiry is already underway) executed,

Then, why don’t you demand execution of those, who shot down an Iranian passenger plane??? As there is no inquiry underway but you all are silent, why????

Then, why don’t you demand execution of those, who toppled mossadiq’s democratically elected govt in iran in 1953????

Then, why you don’t demand execution of bush, who killed millions of people worldwide on false claims by forging the facts, why????

Then, why you don’t demand execution of those who kidnapped and detained Iranian diplomats for years without charge, illegally, in iraq, why????

Then, why don’t you demand execution of those, who created and strengthened al-qaeda, that resulted thousands of innocent killings later on 911, why????

Then, why don’t you demand execution of rumsfeld, who visited iraq and pushed saddam to attack iran, in a result millions of innocent people killed, why????

Then, why don’t you demand execution of those, who blown up whole Iranian parliament that killed dozens of high level Iranian parliamentarians, why????

Etc…

Why you choose and pick cases????
Why you select things????
Why you play with human rights instead implementing it completely every where????

When Britain executes those police officers who misused powers during g20 protests,
Then you praise british system,

When iran tries those police officers, who misused powers during election protests,
Then you call it ‘showpiece’ why????

When you hear guantanamobay prison situation,
Then you never call ‘removal of faulty us system of govt’

When you hear complaints about iran prisons,
Then you immediately…without delay, call ‘removal of system’ in iran, why????

When a 12 year old kid is arrested in usa with hands cuffed,
Then you call it democracy and freedom,

When saboteurs are arrested and detained in iran,
Then you call it ‘democracy at risk’ why????

Mr.Mousavi, you have demanded persecution of those, who have killed Neda, while inquiry is underway and as a civilized person you should not play with people’s sentiments during inquiry because the purpose of inquiry already is to punish criminals,

Mr.Mousavi, would you like to send a letter to us govt requesting punishment for those who had gunned down Iranian passenger plane killing more than two hundred iranians, as you issued various statements and wrote letters in case of Neda????

Mr.Mousavi, you never miss an opportunity to jump and condemn Iranian govt,
At the same time, you always ignore those, who try to sabotage iran and Iranians, why???

You condition your face to face with guardian council with annulment of election,
Why you do not condition good relations of iran with usa with execution of all criminals who played role to destroy iran and Iranians during last 30 years and more????

Mr.Mousavi, why you don’t demand apology from united states for supporting shah’s kingdom ????

Mr.mousavi, why are you so compromising with enemy, and uncompromising with friends???

Mr.Mousavi, Do you call your such actions as “achievements” ????

Mr.Mousavi,
This is not iranian’s achievement, but achievement of enemy,

Mr.Mousavi,
If, you want to mourn, mourn on your actions.


Why united states wants ‘change’ in Iran????

Because, united states has finished playing ‘shia-sunni’ card in the region,

Now, people have become aware of the fact that this ‘shia-sunni’ computerized ‘made in america’ game is not beneficial either for sunnis or shias,

Now, shias and sunnis both have become aware that this is nothing but wahabi+usa game,

On one hand, obama visits house of saud and kisses the dirty hand of wahabi king,
The same king that sponsors terrorism worldwide,
On the other hand, obama claims to fight against terrorism,

Now, united states wants to showpiece friendship with iran in the pretext of change to isolate iran from its sunni neighbors and to throw iran at the level of house of saud,

As the friendship of usa has discredited wahabi house of saud in all over the world,
The same way usa wants to discredit iran in the world specially in the eyes of muslims,

The friendship of united states is a poison for iran,
As the friendship of usa has poised shah of iran and house of saud,

Few temporary benefits from the friendship of usa may add few things temporarily,
But, in the long term such friendship will isolate and discredit iran permanently,

Iran will definitely lose its ideology and its strength of revolution and its respect in the eyes of Iranians and in the eyes of people of the world,

Only fools like mousavi will start running hurriedly to pick up the dry dirty stone of friendship of usa at such heavy cost,

Once cost is paid, can never be returned back,
But, mousavi does not understand this,

What change???
Change is not like changing the dress three times a day,

Iran has achieved such a trust in the heart of people of the world, because of its independent and wise policies, after years of hard work, can not be gifted to usa in return of such friendship that once saddam enjoyed,

But, mousavi, shah of iran, house of saud and saddam type of leaders do not understand this.

Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner of france told the Le Parisien/Aujourd'hui en France newspapers on Monday, August 10, 2009 that:

“If (iranian) protestors, who were being chased had sought refuge in the French Embassy, the instruction was to open the door,"

"This is a European order. This is in our humanitarian and democratic tradition,"

In early morning on Tuesday, Sept 22, 2009, Hundreds of French riot police armed with flamethrowers, stun guns and tear gas moved in to asylum seeker’s camp in northern france, detaining nearly 300 asylum-seekers.

Witnesses say there was one police officer for each migrant at the site. Human rights activists rushed to the scene in an attempt to stop the raid. "I think it's inhumane. They dragged people out of their tents. It isn't fair", an aid worker said.

The detained refugees, half of them minors were bussed to police stations to be processed. They will later be sent back to the countries where they entered the European Union.

Bulldozers have encircled the camp to raze it to the ground.

Mr.Kouch!

Do bulldozers also come under ‘european order’ ???
Do Dragging asylum seekers out of their tents also come under ‘french humanitarian tradition’ ???
Do the equation of one police officer on one refugee also come under ‘french democratic tradition’ ???

First you ‘open the door’ for refugees and then you beat them, entertain them with flamethrowers, stun guns and tear gas, drag them on the floor, arrest them and send them to police stations for the ‘process’ ????

Do all that come under ‘french democratic values’ in your view ????

Le..La…Lela,
De..Da..DeDa,
Hoo…Hoo.